The Impact of Telehealth on Cost and Time Efficiency for Patients With Disabilities During Nonemergency Encounters: A Scoping Review.

Q2 Social Sciences
Kaushalya Mendis, Veda Priya Puligundla, Myles Rosenzweig, Melissa Coffel, John Geracitano, Saif Khairat
{"title":"The Impact of Telehealth on Cost and Time Efficiency for Patients With Disabilities During Nonemergency Encounters: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kaushalya Mendis, Veda Priya Puligundla, Myles Rosenzweig, Melissa Coffel, John Geracitano, Saif Khairat","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth services have expanded in recent years, showing promising potential to improve health care access. This review examined the impact of telehealth on individuals of all ages living with chronic disabilities with a focus on cost, as well as other key outcomes such as time efficiency, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRISMA guidelines were followed to examine US-based studies between 2018 and 2024 across 4 databases using keywords related to cost, telehealth, and disability. Studies were screened using Covidence software. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion. Data was extracted using a standardized form and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 230 preliminary studies, 8 met the inclusion criteria. Telehealth interventions were found to be time and cost effective with comparable clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction for individuals of all ages with disabilities. However, some challenges of integrating processes in emergency departments resulting in longer stays and implementation issues were noted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although cost benefits were evident for patients, programs, and health systems, successful implementation depends on resolving challenges related to digital infrastructure, equitable access, and patient-practitioner rapport.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telehealth represents a promising approach to improving health care access for individuals with disabilities, if implementation challenges are strategically addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth services have expanded in recent years, showing promising potential to improve health care access. This review examined the impact of telehealth on individuals of all ages living with chronic disabilities with a focus on cost, as well as other key outcomes such as time efficiency, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Methods: PRISMA guidelines were followed to examine US-based studies between 2018 and 2024 across 4 databases using keywords related to cost, telehealth, and disability. Studies were screened using Covidence software. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion. Data was extracted using a standardized form and thematically analyzed.

Results: Out of 230 preliminary studies, 8 met the inclusion criteria. Telehealth interventions were found to be time and cost effective with comparable clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction for individuals of all ages with disabilities. However, some challenges of integrating processes in emergency departments resulting in longer stays and implementation issues were noted.

Discussion: Although cost benefits were evident for patients, programs, and health systems, successful implementation depends on resolving challenges related to digital infrastructure, equitable access, and patient-practitioner rapport.

Conclusion: Telehealth represents a promising approach to improving health care access for individuals with disabilities, if implementation challenges are strategically addressed.

远程医疗对非紧急情况下残疾患者成本和时间效率的影响:范围审查。
背景:近年来,远程保健服务不断扩大,显示出改善保健服务获取的巨大潜力。本综述研究了远程医疗对所有年龄的慢性残疾患者的影响,重点是成本,以及其他关键结果,如时间效率、临床结果和患者满意度。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,使用与成本、远程医疗和残疾相关的关键词,对2018年至2024年间美国4个数据库中的研究进行了检查。使用covid软件筛选研究。两名评论者独立评估了纳入的研究。使用标准化表格提取数据并对其进行主题分析。结果:230项初步研究中,8项符合纳入标准。发现远程保健干预具有时间效益和成本效益,对所有年龄的残疾人具有相当的临床结果和较高的患者满意度。然而,有人指出,在急诊科整合流程方面存在一些挑战,导致住院时间延长和执行问题。讨论:尽管成本效益对患者、项目和卫生系统都是显而易见的,但成功实施取决于解决与数字基础设施、公平获取和医患关系相关的挑战。结论:如果能够战略性地解决实施方面的挑战,远程保健是改善残疾人获得保健服务的一种有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信