Implementation of Established Conditions and Use of Quality by Design Principles during Drug Development: Status in the US, EU, and Japan. Data from a Survey Conducted by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Yoshio Nakayama, Sonoko Yamauchi, Kozue Shimizume, Akinobu Nakanishi, Maki Masuyama, Yasuyo Ozaki, Koji Nakamura, Makoto Fujikawa, Masatsugu Kobayashi, Yuji Kashitani
{"title":"Implementation of Established Conditions and Use of Quality by Design Principles during Drug Development: Status in the US, EU, and Japan. Data from a Survey Conducted by the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA).","authors":"Yoshio Nakayama, Sonoko Yamauchi, Kozue Shimizume, Akinobu Nakanishi, Maki Masuyama, Yasuyo Ozaki, Koji Nakamura, Makoto Fujikawa, Masatsugu Kobayashi, Yuji Kashitani","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00856-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The JPMA conducted a survey among its member companies regarding the use of Established Conditions (ECs) under ICH Q12. ECs can be set by companies that develop new drugs using the Quality by Design (QbD) approach defined in ICH Q8 and have an effective Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) as per ICH Q10. The survey revealed that while the use of QbD has increased, surpassing 70% in Japan since 2021, the adoption of ECs in New Drug Application (NDA) submissions remains low due to a lack of legal framework and internal understanding. More companies were using ECs in post-approval changes (PACs) compared to NDA submissions. The survey also found that companies prefer the existing systems in each region when determining the change category during change initiation. While Europe and the US believe that risk assessment of changes and ECs are consistent with an effective PQS, Japan perceives a mismatch between change assessment and predetermined change categories at the time of approval. This results in Japan willing to have an option applying the risk assessment at change control to reporting category evaluation. Considering these circumstances, it is anticipated that the use of ECs will gradually expand, primarily in PACs. The discrepancies in change procedures among countries may hinder a stable supply, so Japan should consider introducing change guidelines similar to those in Europe and the US to facilitate a hybrid approach to approvals that can accommodate the expanded use of ECs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00856-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The JPMA conducted a survey among its member companies regarding the use of Established Conditions (ECs) under ICH Q12. ECs can be set by companies that develop new drugs using the Quality by Design (QbD) approach defined in ICH Q8 and have an effective Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) as per ICH Q10. The survey revealed that while the use of QbD has increased, surpassing 70% in Japan since 2021, the adoption of ECs in New Drug Application (NDA) submissions remains low due to a lack of legal framework and internal understanding. More companies were using ECs in post-approval changes (PACs) compared to NDA submissions. The survey also found that companies prefer the existing systems in each region when determining the change category during change initiation. While Europe and the US believe that risk assessment of changes and ECs are consistent with an effective PQS, Japan perceives a mismatch between change assessment and predetermined change categories at the time of approval. This results in Japan willing to have an option applying the risk assessment at change control to reporting category evaluation. Considering these circumstances, it is anticipated that the use of ECs will gradually expand, primarily in PACs. The discrepancies in change procedures among countries may hinder a stable supply, so Japan should consider introducing change guidelines similar to those in Europe and the US to facilitate a hybrid approach to approvals that can accommodate the expanded use of ECs.

药物开发过程中既定条件的实施和质量设计原则的使用:美国、欧盟和日本的现状。数据来自日本药品制造商协会(JPMA)的一项调查。
JPMA对其成员公司进行了一项关于ICH Q12下既定条件(ec)使用的调查。ec可以由使用ICH Q8中定义的质量设计(QbD)方法开发新药并具有ICH Q10中有效的药品质量体系(PQS)的公司设定。调查显示,虽然QbD的使用有所增加,自2021年以来在日本超过70%,但由于缺乏法律框架和内部理解,ECs在新药申请(NDA)提交中的采用仍然很低。与NDA提交相比,更多的公司在批准后变更(pac)中使用ec。调查还发现,在变更启动过程中确定变更类别时,公司更倾向于每个地区的现有系统。虽然欧洲和美国认为变更和ec的风险评估与有效的PQS是一致的,但日本认为在批准时变更评估与预定变更类别之间存在不匹配。这导致日本愿意选择将变更控制中的风险评估应用于报告类别评估。考虑到这些情况,预期共同体的使用将逐渐扩大,主要是在pac。各国之间变更程序的差异可能会阻碍稳定的供应,因此日本应考虑引入类似于欧洲和美国的变更指南,以促进混合审批方式,以适应ec的扩大使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信