Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction in Uniportal Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Liang Chen, Ting Yu, Yanqing Pan, Guodong Ma
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction in Uniportal Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.","authors":"Liang Chen, Ting Yu, Yanqing Pan, Guodong Ma","doi":"10.1177/15533506251374834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesGiven the complexity of vascular and bronchial variations during segmental resection, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction has been proposed as an effective tool to address anatomical challenges in segmentectomy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of 3D reconstruction in enhancing anatomical comprehension, optimizing surgical planning, and improving perioperative outcomes.MethodsFrom December 2022 to March 2024, clinical data of 141 patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy were gathered. Based on preoperative examinations, the patients were categorized into the 3D group (51 patients) and the non - 3D group (90 patients). Primary endpoints were resection margin (distance from staple line to tumor) and operative time; secondary endpoints included intraoperative blood loss, conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Propensity score matching was carried out to mitigate selection bias between the two groups.ResultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching, 51 patients were included in each group. The operation time in the 3D group was shorter than that in the non-3D group (<i>P</i> = 0.004). The 3D group had significantly less blood loss compared to the non-3D group (<i>P</i> = 0.004). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding resection margins, harvested lymph nodes, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.Conclusions3D reconstruction enhances anatomical understanding, shortens operative time, reduces blood loss, and facilitates surgical plan adjustments, while ensuring adequate resection margins in uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251374834"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesGiven the complexity of vascular and bronchial variations during segmental resection, three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction has been proposed as an effective tool to address anatomical challenges in segmentectomy. This study aims to evaluate the utility of 3D reconstruction in enhancing anatomical comprehension, optimizing surgical planning, and improving perioperative outcomes.MethodsFrom December 2022 to March 2024, clinical data of 141 patients who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy were gathered. Based on preoperative examinations, the patients were categorized into the 3D group (51 patients) and the non - 3D group (90 patients). Primary endpoints were resection margin (distance from staple line to tumor) and operative time; secondary endpoints included intraoperative blood loss, conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Propensity score matching was carried out to mitigate selection bias between the two groups.ResultsAfter 1:1 propensity score matching, 51 patients were included in each group. The operation time in the 3D group was shorter than that in the non-3D group (P = 0.004). The 3D group had significantly less blood loss compared to the non-3D group (P = 0.004). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding resection margins, harvested lymph nodes, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.Conclusions3D reconstruction enhances anatomical understanding, shortens operative time, reduces blood loss, and facilitates surgical plan adjustments, while ensuring adequate resection margins in uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

单门胸腔镜节段切除术的三维计算机断层重建:倾向评分匹配分析。
考虑到节段切除术中血管和支气管变化的复杂性,三维(3D)重建被认为是解决节段切除术中解剖学挑战的有效工具。本研究旨在评估三维重建在增强解剖理解、优化手术计划和改善围手术期预后方面的应用。方法收集2022年12月至2024年3月行单门胸腔镜肺段切除术的141例患者的临床资料。根据术前检查将患者分为3D组(51例)和非3D组(90例)。主要终点是切除边缘(钉线到肿瘤的距离)和手术时间;次要终点包括术中出血量、转开胸术、术后并发症和住院时间。进行倾向评分匹配以减轻两组之间的选择偏差。结果经1:1倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入51例患者。3D组手术时间短于非3D组(P = 0.004)。3D组出血量明显少于非3D组(P = 0.004)。在切除边缘、淋巴结切除、术后引流、住院时间和术后并发症方面,组间无显著差异。结论三维重建增强了对解剖的认识,缩短了手术时间,减少了出血量,便于手术方案的调整,同时保证了单门胸腔镜节段切除术有足够的切除边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信