Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years.

IF 3.5 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Scientometrics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x
Anna-Lena Rüland, Lise H Andersen, Alan Kai Hassen, Carringtone Kinyanjui, Annika Ralfs, Bruno Iochins Grisci
{"title":"Science diplomacy: A global research field? Findings from a bibliometric analysis of the science diplomacy scholarship of the past twenty years.","authors":"Anna-Lena Rüland, Lise H Andersen, Alan Kai Hassen, Carringtone Kinyanjui, Annika Ralfs, Bruno Iochins Grisci","doi":"10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Science diplomacy is a unique research field that is driven and shaped by scholars and practitioners alike. This study examines whether and how recent trends in the broader science diplomacy discourse have impacted scholarship on the topic. First, it examines whether the pertinent scholarship is as international in outlook as practitioners have made science diplomacy out to be. Second, the study investigates whether recent calls to diversify the science diplomacy scholarship have gained traction. It does so by examining how diverse the science diplomacy scholarship is in terms of: (i) The geographical distribution of authors, (ii) the geographical distribution of funding sources as well as (iii) the geographical area that is being studied in science diplomacy publications. Using a network analysis and a large language model-enhanced bibliometric analysis, the study shows that the internationalization of the field-both in terms of author affiliations and geographical area being studied in publications-is only slowly advancing and is currently restricted to a few regions, with the United States and Europe clearly dominating the production of knowledge on science diplomacy. Overall, the study's findings thus corroborate past claims that the science diplomacy scholarship exhibits North-South dynamics similar to those in other research fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":"130 8","pages":"4697-4722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientometrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05396-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science diplomacy is a unique research field that is driven and shaped by scholars and practitioners alike. This study examines whether and how recent trends in the broader science diplomacy discourse have impacted scholarship on the topic. First, it examines whether the pertinent scholarship is as international in outlook as practitioners have made science diplomacy out to be. Second, the study investigates whether recent calls to diversify the science diplomacy scholarship have gained traction. It does so by examining how diverse the science diplomacy scholarship is in terms of: (i) The geographical distribution of authors, (ii) the geographical distribution of funding sources as well as (iii) the geographical area that is being studied in science diplomacy publications. Using a network analysis and a large language model-enhanced bibliometric analysis, the study shows that the internationalization of the field-both in terms of author affiliations and geographical area being studied in publications-is only slowly advancing and is currently restricted to a few regions, with the United States and Europe clearly dominating the production of knowledge on science diplomacy. Overall, the study's findings thus corroborate past claims that the science diplomacy scholarship exhibits North-South dynamics similar to those in other research fields.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

科学外交:一个全球性的研究领域?对近二十年来科学外交学术研究的文献计量分析结果。
科学外交是一个由学者和实践者共同推动和塑造的独特研究领域。本研究考察了更广泛的科学外交话语的最新趋势是否以及如何影响了该主题的学术研究。首先,它考察了相关的学术研究是否像科学外交的实践者所描述的那样具有国际视野。其次,该研究调查了最近关于科学外交奖学金多样化的呼吁是否获得了支持。它通过检查科学外交奖学金在以下方面的多样性来做到这一点:(i)作者的地理分布,(ii)资金来源的地理分布,以及(iii)科学外交出版物所研究的地理区域。通过网络分析和大型语言模型增强的文献计量分析,该研究表明,该领域的国际化——从作者隶属关系和出版物研究的地理区域来看——进展缓慢,目前仅限于少数地区,美国和欧洲显然主导着科学外交知识的生产。总的来说,这项研究的发现因此证实了过去的说法,即科学外交奖学金表现出与其他研究领域类似的南北动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientometrics
Scientometrics 管理科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
351
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Scientometrics aims at publishing original studies, short communications, preliminary reports, review papers, letters to the editor and book reviews on scientometrics. The topics covered are results of research concerned with the quantitative features and characteristics of science. Emphasis is placed on investigations in which the development and mechanism of science are studied by means of (statistical) mathematical methods. The Journal also provides the reader with important up-to-date information about international meetings and events in scientometrics and related fields. Appropriate bibliographic compilations are published as a separate section. Due to its fully interdisciplinary character, Scientometrics is indispensable to research workers and research administrators throughout the world. It provides valuable assistance to librarians and documentalists in central scientific agencies, ministries, research institutes and laboratories. Scientometrics includes the Journal of Research Communication Studies. Consequently its aims and scope cover that of the latter, namely, to bring the results of research investigations together in one place, in such a form that they will be of use not only to the investigators themselves but also to the entrepreneurs and research workers who form the object of these studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信