Impact of Inspiratory Pressure Rise Time on Lung-Emptying in Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Benjamin Neetz, Patrick Rehn, Nicole Kraus, Werner Schmidt, Lars Reinhardt, Thomas Flohr, Christoph Laußer, Markus Alexander Weigand, Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka
{"title":"Impact of Inspiratory Pressure Rise Time on Lung-Emptying in Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation.","authors":"Benjamin Neetz, Patrick Rehn, Nicole Kraus, Werner Schmidt, Lars Reinhardt, Thomas Flohr, Christoph Laußer, Markus Alexander Weigand, Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka","doi":"10.1177/19433654251359959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The airway pressure release ventilation (APRV)-based time controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) protocol can potentially minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Inspiratory pressure rise time (IPRT) is a parameter available in pressure-controlled ventilation modes, yet its role within TCAV remains unclear. We hypothesized that varying IPRTs impact lung emptying and associated ventilatory parameters (driving pressure [ΔP], intrinsic PEEP [PEEPi], exhaled tidal volume [V<sub>Te</sub>]). <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, prospective exploratory study included 10 intubated subjects ventilated utilizing the TCAV protocol. Subjects underwent consecutive experimental trials with IPRTs of 500 and 1,000 ms, each preceded by a baseline (BL) with an IPRT of 0 ms. Analyzed parameters were ventilator-derived ΔP (ΔP<sub>vent</sub>), PEEPi, and V<sub>Te</sub>. Elastance (E<sub>RS</sub> = ΔP<sub>vent</sub>/V<sub>Te</sub>) and elastance-derived ΔP (ΔP<sub>elast</sub> = E<sub>RS</sub> × V<sub>Te</sub>) were calculated. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and end-inspiratory lung volume were assessed through electrical impedance tomography (EIT). <b>Results:</b> Prolonged IPRT increased ΔP<sub>elast</sub> compared with ΔP<sub>vent</sub> in each baseline/trial combination (ΔP<sub>vent</sub> 13.5 ± 1.5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs ΔP<sub>elast</sub> 18.4 ± 2.7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O at 1,000 ms IPRT, <i>P</i> < .001) through a loss of PEEPi. Conventional PEEPi measurements did not detect these changes. The EIT data showed a reduction in EELV during the trials. <b>Conclusions:</b> IPRT prolongation under TCAV reduced EELV/PEEPi, therefore increasing ΔP. Conventional PEEPi measurement methods are misleading in this context. We therefore suggest adding the recommendation to set IPRT to 0 ms for the TCAV protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654251359959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The airway pressure release ventilation (APRV)-based time controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) protocol can potentially minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Inspiratory pressure rise time (IPRT) is a parameter available in pressure-controlled ventilation modes, yet its role within TCAV remains unclear. We hypothesized that varying IPRTs impact lung emptying and associated ventilatory parameters (driving pressure [ΔP], intrinsic PEEP [PEEPi], exhaled tidal volume [VTe]). Methods: This single-center, prospective exploratory study included 10 intubated subjects ventilated utilizing the TCAV protocol. Subjects underwent consecutive experimental trials with IPRTs of 500 and 1,000 ms, each preceded by a baseline (BL) with an IPRT of 0 ms. Analyzed parameters were ventilator-derived ΔP (ΔPvent), PEEPi, and VTe. Elastance (ERS = ΔPvent/VTe) and elastance-derived ΔP (ΔPelast = ERS × VTe) were calculated. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and end-inspiratory lung volume were assessed through electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Results: Prolonged IPRT increased ΔPelast compared with ΔPvent in each baseline/trial combination (ΔPvent 13.5 ± 1.5 cm H2O vs ΔPelast 18.4 ± 2.7 cm H2O at 1,000 ms IPRT, P < .001) through a loss of PEEPi. Conventional PEEPi measurements did not detect these changes. The EIT data showed a reduction in EELV during the trials. Conclusions: IPRT prolongation under TCAV reduced EELV/PEEPi, therefore increasing ΔP. Conventional PEEPi measurement methods are misleading in this context. We therefore suggest adding the recommendation to set IPRT to 0 ms for the TCAV protocol.

适时调节适应性通气中吸气压力上升时间对肺排空的影响。
背景:基于气道压力释放通气(APRV)的时间控制自适应通气(TCAV)方案可以潜在地减少呼吸机诱导的肺损伤(VILI)。吸气压力上升时间(IPRT)是压力控制通气模式中可用的参数,但其在TCAV中的作用尚不清楚。我们假设不同的iprt会影响肺排空和相关的通气参数(驱动压[ΔP]、内在PEEP [PEEPi]、呼出潮气量[VTe])。方法:这项单中心前瞻性探索性研究包括10名采用TCAV方案通气的插管受试者。受试者连续进行500和1000 ms的IPRT实验,每次实验之前都有一个基线(BL), IPRT为0 ms。分析的参数为呼吸机衍生的ΔP (ΔPvent)、PEEPi和VTe。计算弹性(ERS = ΔPvent/VTe)和弹性衍生的ΔP (ΔPelast = ERS × VTe)。通过电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)评估呼气末肺体积(EELV)和吸气末肺体积(EIT)。结果:通过PEEPi的丧失,延长IPRT的ΔPelast与ΔPvent相比,在每个基线/试验组合中(1,000 ms IPRT时ΔPvent 13.5±1.5 cm H2O vs ΔPelast 18.4±2.7 cm H2O, P < .001)增加。常规的PEEPi测量没有检测到这些变化。EIT数据显示,试验期间EELV有所降低。结论:TCAV下延长IPRT可降低EELV/PEEPi,因此增加ΔP。在这种情况下,传统的PEEPi测量方法具有误导性。因此,我们建议将TCAV协议的IPRT设置为0 ms。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信