Benjamin Neetz, Patrick Rehn, Nicole Kraus, Werner Schmidt, Lars Reinhardt, Thomas Flohr, Christoph Laußer, Markus Alexander Weigand, Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka
{"title":"Impact of Inspiratory Pressure Rise Time on Lung-Emptying in Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation.","authors":"Benjamin Neetz, Patrick Rehn, Nicole Kraus, Werner Schmidt, Lars Reinhardt, Thomas Flohr, Christoph Laußer, Markus Alexander Weigand, Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka","doi":"10.1177/19433654251359959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The airway pressure release ventilation (APRV)-based time controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) protocol can potentially minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Inspiratory pressure rise time (IPRT) is a parameter available in pressure-controlled ventilation modes, yet its role within TCAV remains unclear. We hypothesized that varying IPRTs impact lung emptying and associated ventilatory parameters (driving pressure [ΔP], intrinsic PEEP [PEEPi], exhaled tidal volume [V<sub>Te</sub>]). <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, prospective exploratory study included 10 intubated subjects ventilated utilizing the TCAV protocol. Subjects underwent consecutive experimental trials with IPRTs of 500 and 1,000 ms, each preceded by a baseline (BL) with an IPRT of 0 ms. Analyzed parameters were ventilator-derived ΔP (ΔP<sub>vent</sub>), PEEPi, and V<sub>Te</sub>. Elastance (E<sub>RS</sub> = ΔP<sub>vent</sub>/V<sub>Te</sub>) and elastance-derived ΔP (ΔP<sub>elast</sub> = E<sub>RS</sub> × V<sub>Te</sub>) were calculated. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and end-inspiratory lung volume were assessed through electrical impedance tomography (EIT). <b>Results:</b> Prolonged IPRT increased ΔP<sub>elast</sub> compared with ΔP<sub>vent</sub> in each baseline/trial combination (ΔP<sub>vent</sub> 13.5 ± 1.5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs ΔP<sub>elast</sub> 18.4 ± 2.7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O at 1,000 ms IPRT, <i>P</i> < .001) through a loss of PEEPi. Conventional PEEPi measurements did not detect these changes. The EIT data showed a reduction in EELV during the trials. <b>Conclusions:</b> IPRT prolongation under TCAV reduced EELV/PEEPi, therefore increasing ΔP. Conventional PEEPi measurement methods are misleading in this context. We therefore suggest adding the recommendation to set IPRT to 0 ms for the TCAV protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654251359959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The airway pressure release ventilation (APRV)-based time controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) protocol can potentially minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Inspiratory pressure rise time (IPRT) is a parameter available in pressure-controlled ventilation modes, yet its role within TCAV remains unclear. We hypothesized that varying IPRTs impact lung emptying and associated ventilatory parameters (driving pressure [ΔP], intrinsic PEEP [PEEPi], exhaled tidal volume [VTe]). Methods: This single-center, prospective exploratory study included 10 intubated subjects ventilated utilizing the TCAV protocol. Subjects underwent consecutive experimental trials with IPRTs of 500 and 1,000 ms, each preceded by a baseline (BL) with an IPRT of 0 ms. Analyzed parameters were ventilator-derived ΔP (ΔPvent), PEEPi, and VTe. Elastance (ERS = ΔPvent/VTe) and elastance-derived ΔP (ΔPelast = ERS × VTe) were calculated. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and end-inspiratory lung volume were assessed through electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Results: Prolonged IPRT increased ΔPelast compared with ΔPvent in each baseline/trial combination (ΔPvent 13.5 ± 1.5 cm H2O vs ΔPelast 18.4 ± 2.7 cm H2O at 1,000 ms IPRT, P < .001) through a loss of PEEPi. Conventional PEEPi measurements did not detect these changes. The EIT data showed a reduction in EELV during the trials. Conclusions: IPRT prolongation under TCAV reduced EELV/PEEPi, therefore increasing ΔP. Conventional PEEPi measurement methods are misleading in this context. We therefore suggest adding the recommendation to set IPRT to 0 ms for the TCAV protocol.
背景:基于气道压力释放通气(APRV)的时间控制自适应通气(TCAV)方案可以潜在地减少呼吸机诱导的肺损伤(VILI)。吸气压力上升时间(IPRT)是压力控制通气模式中可用的参数,但其在TCAV中的作用尚不清楚。我们假设不同的iprt会影响肺排空和相关的通气参数(驱动压[ΔP]、内在PEEP [PEEPi]、呼出潮气量[VTe])。方法:这项单中心前瞻性探索性研究包括10名采用TCAV方案通气的插管受试者。受试者连续进行500和1000 ms的IPRT实验,每次实验之前都有一个基线(BL), IPRT为0 ms。分析的参数为呼吸机衍生的ΔP (ΔPvent)、PEEPi和VTe。计算弹性(ERS = ΔPvent/VTe)和弹性衍生的ΔP (ΔPelast = ERS × VTe)。通过电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)评估呼气末肺体积(EELV)和吸气末肺体积(EIT)。结果:通过PEEPi的丧失,延长IPRT的ΔPelast与ΔPvent相比,在每个基线/试验组合中(1,000 ms IPRT时ΔPvent 13.5±1.5 cm H2O vs ΔPelast 18.4±2.7 cm H2O, P < .001)增加。常规的PEEPi测量没有检测到这些变化。EIT数据显示,试验期间EELV有所降低。结论:TCAV下延长IPRT可降低EELV/PEEPi,因此增加ΔP。在这种情况下,传统的PEEPi测量方法具有误导性。因此,我们建议将TCAV协议的IPRT设置为0 ms。
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.