Multiplex Targeted Proteomic Analysis of Cytokine Ratios for ICU Mortality in Severe COVID-19.

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Rúben Araújo, Cristiana P Von Rekowski, Tiago A H Fonseca, Cecília R C Calado, Luís Ramalhete, Luís Bento
{"title":"Multiplex Targeted Proteomic Analysis of Cytokine Ratios for ICU Mortality in Severe COVID-19.","authors":"Rúben Araújo, Cristiana P Von Rekowski, Tiago A H Fonseca, Cecília R C Calado, Luís Ramalhete, Luís Bento","doi":"10.3390/proteomes13030035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and timely prediction of mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, particularly those with COVID-19, remains clinically challenging due to complex immune responses. Proteomic cytokine profiling holds promise for refining mortality risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples from 89 ICU patients (55 discharged, 34 deceased) were analyzed using a multiplex 21-cytokine panel. Samples were stratified into three groups based on time from collection to outcome: ≤48 h (Group 1: Early), >48 h to ≤7 days (Group 2: Intermediate), and >7 days to ≤14 days (Group 3: Late). Cytokine levels, simple cytokine ratios, and previously unexplored complex ratios between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were evaluated. Machine learning-based feature selection identified the most predictive ratios, with performance evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complex cytokine ratios demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to traditional severity markers (APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA), individual cytokines, and simple ratios, effectively distinguishing discharged from deceased patients across all groups (AUC: 0.918-1.000; sensitivity: 0.826-1.000; specificity: 0.775-0.900).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiplex cytokine profiling enhanced by computationally derived complex ratios may offer robust predictive capabilities for ICU mortality risk stratification, serving as a valuable tool for personalized prognosis in critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20877,"journal":{"name":"Proteomes","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes13030035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate and timely prediction of mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, particularly those with COVID-19, remains clinically challenging due to complex immune responses. Proteomic cytokine profiling holds promise for refining mortality risk assessment.

Methods: Serum samples from 89 ICU patients (55 discharged, 34 deceased) were analyzed using a multiplex 21-cytokine panel. Samples were stratified into three groups based on time from collection to outcome: ≤48 h (Group 1: Early), >48 h to ≤7 days (Group 2: Intermediate), and >7 days to ≤14 days (Group 3: Late). Cytokine levels, simple cytokine ratios, and previously unexplored complex ratios between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were evaluated. Machine learning-based feature selection identified the most predictive ratios, with performance evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Complex cytokine ratios demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to traditional severity markers (APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA), individual cytokines, and simple ratios, effectively distinguishing discharged from deceased patients across all groups (AUC: 0.918-1.000; sensitivity: 0.826-1.000; specificity: 0.775-0.900).

Conclusions: Multiplex cytokine profiling enhanced by computationally derived complex ratios may offer robust predictive capabilities for ICU mortality risk stratification, serving as a valuable tool for personalized prognosis in critical care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重症COVID-19重症监护病房死亡率细胞因子比值的多重靶向蛋白质组学分析
背景:由于复杂的免疫反应,准确及时地预测重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率,特别是COVID-19患者的死亡率,在临床上仍然具有挑战性。蛋白质组细胞因子分析有望改善死亡率风险评估。方法:对89例ICU患者(出院55例,死亡34例)的血清进行多重21细胞因子检测。根据样本从采集到结果的时间分为三组:≤48 h(第1组:早期),>48 h至≤7天(第2组:中期),>7天至≤14天(第3组:晚期)。评估细胞因子水平、简单细胞因子比率和以前未探索的促炎性和抗炎性细胞因子之间的复杂比率。基于机器学习的特征选择确定了最具预测性的比率,并通过曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度和特异性来评估性能。结果:与传统的严重程度标志物(APACHE II、SAPS II、SOFA)、单个细胞因子和简单比值相比,复杂细胞因子比值具有更高的预测准确性,可有效区分所有组的出院和死亡患者(AUC: 0.918-1.000;敏感性:0.826-1.000;特异性:0.775-0.900)。结论:通过计算衍生的复杂比率增强的多重细胞因子谱可能为ICU死亡风险分层提供强大的预测能力,可作为危重护理个性化预后的有价值工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proteomes
Proteomes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Proteomes (ISSN 2227-7382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of proteome science. Proteomes covers the multi-disciplinary topics of structural and functional biology, protein chemistry, cell biology, methodology used for protein analysis, including mass spectrometry, protein arrays, bioinformatics, HTS assays, etc. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers. Scope: -whole proteome analysis of any organism -disease/pharmaceutical studies -comparative proteomics -protein-ligand/protein interactions -structure/functional proteomics -gene expression -methodology -bioinformatics -applications of proteomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信