Video-Assisted Versus Audio-Assisted Dispatcher Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Optimizing Compression Quality in Simulated Scenarios: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
{"title":"Video-Assisted Versus Audio-Assisted Dispatcher Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Optimizing Compression Quality in Simulated Scenarios: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Xinyu Tan, Xiaokai Wang, Xiangmin Li, Xinbo Yin","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2547651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate video-assisted dispatcher cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) versus audio-assisted dispatcher CPR impacts on compression quality in simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared V-DACPR versus audio-assisted dispatcher CPR (A-DACPR) and control. The primary outcome was the compression rate; the secondary outcomes included compression depth, time to first compression, and interruption time. Network meta-analysis of RCTs compared dispatcher-guided CPR with video feedback versus telephone-only instructions in simulated OHCA scenarios using high-fidelity manikins. Three intervention arms were compared: video-assisted CPR, audio-assisted CPR, and unguided CPR (control). Standardized mean differences (SMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated using Bayesian network meta-analysis methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen trials (<i>n</i> = 1,556) were analyzed. V-DACPR showed superior compression rates versus A-DACPR (impact size: -21.37, 95% CI: -36.10, -7.41) and control (-43.04, 95% CI: -63.05, -22.52). V-DACPR demonstrated better time to first compression versus control (-42.23, 95% CI: -83.31, -1.42) and favorable trends in compression depth (-5.06, 95% CI: -12.40 to 2.12) and interruption time, though several comparisons between V-DACPR and A-DACPR did not reach statistical significance. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 12-63%). Confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) assessment supported moderate to high-quality evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>V-DACPR demonstrated significant advantages in compression rate in simulated scenarios, with favorable trends in other quality metrics compared to A-DACPR. These findings support the potential for video assistance technology in dispatcher-guided CPR, particularly for optimizing compression rates. However, these results were observed in simulation studies and require validation in real-world clinical settings to determine their impact on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2547651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate video-assisted dispatcher cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) versus audio-assisted dispatcher CPR impacts on compression quality in simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) scenarios.
Methods: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared V-DACPR versus audio-assisted dispatcher CPR (A-DACPR) and control. The primary outcome was the compression rate; the secondary outcomes included compression depth, time to first compression, and interruption time. Network meta-analysis of RCTs compared dispatcher-guided CPR with video feedback versus telephone-only instructions in simulated OHCA scenarios using high-fidelity manikins. Three intervention arms were compared: video-assisted CPR, audio-assisted CPR, and unguided CPR (control). Standardized mean differences (SMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated using Bayesian network meta-analysis methodology.
Results: Fifteen trials (n = 1,556) were analyzed. V-DACPR showed superior compression rates versus A-DACPR (impact size: -21.37, 95% CI: -36.10, -7.41) and control (-43.04, 95% CI: -63.05, -22.52). V-DACPR demonstrated better time to first compression versus control (-42.23, 95% CI: -83.31, -1.42) and favorable trends in compression depth (-5.06, 95% CI: -12.40 to 2.12) and interruption time, though several comparisons between V-DACPR and A-DACPR did not reach statistical significance. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2 = 12-63%). Confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) assessment supported moderate to high-quality evidence.
Conclusions: V-DACPR demonstrated significant advantages in compression rate in simulated scenarios, with favorable trends in other quality metrics compared to A-DACPR. These findings support the potential for video assistance technology in dispatcher-guided CPR, particularly for optimizing compression rates. However, these results were observed in simulation studies and require validation in real-world clinical settings to determine their impact on patient outcomes.
期刊介绍：
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
