Terrorist Attacks Against Health Care Facilities, Health Care Workers, and First Responders: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1017/S1049023X25101313
Mitch Lommen, Dennis G Barten, Kyra Heuvelings, Harald G De Cauwer, Frits van Osch, Derrick Tin, Gregory Ciottone
{"title":"Terrorist Attacks Against Health Care Facilities, Health Care Workers, and First Responders: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Mitch Lommen, Dennis G Barten, Kyra Heuvelings, Harald G De Cauwer, Frits van Osch, Derrick Tin, Gregory Ciottone","doi":"10.1017/S1049023X25101313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since 2001, the world has encountered an increase in terrorist attacks on civilian targets, during which conventional as well as unconventional modalities are being used. Terrorist attacks put immediate strains on health care systems, whilst they may also directly threaten the safety of first responders, health care workers, and health care facilities.</p><p><strong>Study objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing research on terrorist attacks targeting health care facilities, health care workers, and first responders, and to identify opportunities to improve future research and health care response to terrorist attacks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted through electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to check eligibility. Extracted data from the articles included the title, first author, year of publication, journal, study design, number of attacks, number of injured, number of fatalities, target type, and weapon modalities. Furthermore, methodological quality assessment was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search within three major databases yielded 4,656 articles, including 2,777, 1,843, and 36 articles from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, respectively. Finally, 11 studies were included, which were all database reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review included 11 studies focusing on terrorist attacks against health care facilities, health care workers, and first responders. Nearly all studies were exclusively based on the Global Terrorism Database (GTD). An increase of attacks on health care-related targets was consistently reported by all studies in this review, but there were significant discrepancies in reported outcomes. In order to improve counter-terrorism preparedness and the future protection of health care workers, counter-terrorism medicine (CTM) research may benefit from a more standardized and transparent approach to document and analyze terrorist attacks, as well as the inclusion of additional databases other than the GTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"224-231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X25101313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Since 2001, the world has encountered an increase in terrorist attacks on civilian targets, during which conventional as well as unconventional modalities are being used. Terrorist attacks put immediate strains on health care systems, whilst they may also directly threaten the safety of first responders, health care workers, and health care facilities.

Study objective: This scoping review aimed to systematically map the existing research on terrorist attacks targeting health care facilities, health care workers, and first responders, and to identify opportunities to improve future research and health care response to terrorist attacks.

Methods: A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews. A systematic search for relevant literature was conducted through electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to check eligibility. Extracted data from the articles included the title, first author, year of publication, journal, study design, number of attacks, number of injured, number of fatalities, target type, and weapon modalities. Furthermore, methodological quality assessment was performed.

Results: The initial search within three major databases yielded 4,656 articles, including 2,777, 1,843, and 36 articles from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, respectively. Finally, 11 studies were included, which were all database reviews.

Conclusions: This scoping review included 11 studies focusing on terrorist attacks against health care facilities, health care workers, and first responders. Nearly all studies were exclusively based on the Global Terrorism Database (GTD). An increase of attacks on health care-related targets was consistently reported by all studies in this review, but there were significant discrepancies in reported outcomes. In order to improve counter-terrorism preparedness and the future protection of health care workers, counter-terrorism medicine (CTM) research may benefit from a more standardized and transparent approach to document and analyze terrorist attacks, as well as the inclusion of additional databases other than the GTD.

针对卫生保健设施、卫生保健工作者和急救人员的恐怖袭击:范围审查。
导读:自2001年以来,世界上针对平民目标的恐怖袭击有所增加,在此期间使用了常规和非常规方式。恐怖袭击给卫生保健系统带来直接压力,同时也可能直接威胁到急救人员、卫生保健工作者和卫生保健设施的安全。研究目的:本综述旨在系统地梳理针对卫生保健设施、卫生保健工作者和急救人员的恐怖袭击的现有研究,并确定改进未来研究和卫生保健应对恐怖袭击的机会。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展范围评价进行范围评价。通过PubMed、Cochrane、Embase等电子数据库系统检索相关文献。采用纳入和排除标准检查入选资格。从文章中提取的数据包括标题、第一作者、发表年份、期刊、研究设计、攻击次数、受伤人数、死亡人数、目标类型和武器形式。此外,还进行了方法学质量评价。结果:在三个主要数据库中进行初步搜索,获得了4656篇文章,其中PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的文章分别为2777篇、1843篇和36篇。最后纳入了11项研究,均为数据库综述。结论:本综述纳入了11项研究,重点是针对卫生保健设施、卫生保健工作者和急救人员的恐怖袭击。几乎所有的研究都完全基于全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)。本综述中所有研究一致报告了针对医疗保健相关目标的攻击增加,但报告的结果存在显著差异。为了改进反恐准备工作和今后对医护人员的保护,反恐医学研究可能受益于采用更加标准化和透明的方法来记录和分析恐怖袭击,以及纳入除GTD以外的其他数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信