NIIMBL-facilitated active listening meeting between industry and FDA identifies common challenges for adoption of alternative and rapid microbiological methods.

Q3 Medicine
Jennifer L Mantle, Eugene Schaefer, Kelvin H Lee
{"title":"NIIMBL-facilitated active listening meeting between industry and FDA identifies common challenges for adoption of alternative and rapid microbiological methods.","authors":"Jennifer L Mantle, Eugene Schaefer, Kelvin H Lee","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2025-000026.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative and rapid microbiological methods (ARMM) used in biopharmaceutical manufacturing have potential advantages over current compendial methods in that they can enable faster product release and improved process monitoring and quality assurance. There is value in community-wide discussion on ARMMs to help understand the challenges of ARMM adoption in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. The National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL) attempted to understand the successes and challenges around ARMM adoption through surveys, interviews, and a facilitated Active Listening Meeting between industry and FDA representatives. Through these interactions, it was observed that many organizations have successfully implemented ARMMs in approved manufacturing processes, suggesting an absence of significant regulatory obstacles to implementation. Further, five key elements impacting technology adoption were identified: technology readiness, vendor support, organizational adoption readiness, business case/economics, and regulatory interaction. The Active Listening Meeting format proved valuable for fostering honest and informal conversations between both sponsors and regulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025-000026.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative and rapid microbiological methods (ARMM) used in biopharmaceutical manufacturing have potential advantages over current compendial methods in that they can enable faster product release and improved process monitoring and quality assurance. There is value in community-wide discussion on ARMMs to help understand the challenges of ARMM adoption in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. The National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL) attempted to understand the successes and challenges around ARMM adoption through surveys, interviews, and a facilitated Active Listening Meeting between industry and FDA representatives. Through these interactions, it was observed that many organizations have successfully implemented ARMMs in approved manufacturing processes, suggesting an absence of significant regulatory obstacles to implementation. Further, five key elements impacting technology adoption were identified: technology readiness, vendor support, organizational adoption readiness, business case/economics, and regulatory interaction. The Active Listening Meeting format proved valuable for fostering honest and informal conversations between both sponsors and regulators.

niimbl促进了工业界和FDA之间的积极倾听会议,确定了采用替代和快速微生物学方法的共同挑战。
生物制药生产中使用的替代和快速微生物学方法(ARMM)比目前的药典方法具有潜在的优势,因为它们可以实现更快的产品释放和改进的过程监控和质量保证。在社区范围内讨论ARMM有助于理解生物制药生产中采用ARMM所面临的挑战,这是有价值的。国家生物制药创新研究所(NIIMBL)试图通过调查、访谈以及行业和FDA代表之间的积极倾听会议来了解采用ARMM的成功和挑战。通过这些相互作用,可以观察到许多组织已经成功地在批准的制造过程中实施了arm,这表明在实施过程中没有重大的监管障碍。此外,确定了影响技术采用的五个关键因素:技术准备、供应商支持、组织采用准备、业务案例/经济以及监管交互。事实证明,积极倾听会议的形式对于促进发起人和监管机构之间的诚实和非正式对话很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信