Roadmap to Implementation of a Rapid "Lab in a Pouch" NAT Method for Mycoplasma Testing.

Q3 Medicine
Philip Breugelmans, Karen De Roy, Orm Nieuwenhuizen, Heike Merget-Millitzer
{"title":"Roadmap to Implementation of a Rapid \"Lab in a Pouch\" NAT Method for Mycoplasma Testing.","authors":"Philip Breugelmans, Karen De Roy, Orm Nieuwenhuizen, Heike Merget-Millitzer","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003022.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mycoplasma testing is a mandatory assay for all cell-derived products as part of the microbial control strategy. The compendial methods include an indicator cell culture method and a culture assay. Because the culture assay takes 28 days, the time-to-result (TTR) is one of the longest in the microbiology laboratory. Besides this, the compendial Mycoplasma methods are highly complex, subjective, and need strict segregation of labs to avoid cross-contamination with Mycoplasma. The pharmaceutical industry is seeking faster solutions, like nucleic acid testing (NAT)-based methods. There are alternative and rapid NAT methods on the market enabling a reduction of the TTR to approximately 1 day (1). Although some of these NAT methods offer partial automated solutions (e.g., nucleic acid extraction), many of them still require strict separation of test areas to avoid false-positive results and provide only limited hands-on-time reduction and simplification. In contrast, the BioFire® Filmarray® technology is a NAT method that is easy to use thanks to a closed process-a so called \"lab in a pouch\"-and provides the result within only 2 hours, including sample preparation. Besides the risk reduction of human errors due to the limited manual work involved, the automation can also lead to improved data integrity compared to the compendial method. This paper describes the roadmap of implementation of the BioFire<sup>®</sup> Filmarray<sup>®</sup> technology. The approach from feasibility studies to validation and regulatory submission for a monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based product is provided. As a first, J&J received regulatory approval from several agencies (including the US FDA and the EMA) to apply this technology for a biopharmaceutical product and has started global roll-out to additional products and testing sites. Understanding the risk concomitant with introducing new methods is essential to develop an appropriate validation, implementation, and filing strategy. The process applied at J&J for the first product will be shared in this publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"500-512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003022.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycoplasma testing is a mandatory assay for all cell-derived products as part of the microbial control strategy. The compendial methods include an indicator cell culture method and a culture assay. Because the culture assay takes 28 days, the time-to-result (TTR) is one of the longest in the microbiology laboratory. Besides this, the compendial Mycoplasma methods are highly complex, subjective, and need strict segregation of labs to avoid cross-contamination with Mycoplasma. The pharmaceutical industry is seeking faster solutions, like nucleic acid testing (NAT)-based methods. There are alternative and rapid NAT methods on the market enabling a reduction of the TTR to approximately 1 day (1). Although some of these NAT methods offer partial automated solutions (e.g., nucleic acid extraction), many of them still require strict separation of test areas to avoid false-positive results and provide only limited hands-on-time reduction and simplification. In contrast, the BioFire® Filmarray® technology is a NAT method that is easy to use thanks to a closed process-a so called "lab in a pouch"-and provides the result within only 2 hours, including sample preparation. Besides the risk reduction of human errors due to the limited manual work involved, the automation can also lead to improved data integrity compared to the compendial method. This paper describes the roadmap of implementation of the BioFire® Filmarray® technology. The approach from feasibility studies to validation and regulatory submission for a monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based product is provided. As a first, J&J received regulatory approval from several agencies (including the US FDA and the EMA) to apply this technology for a biopharmaceutical product and has started global roll-out to additional products and testing sites. Understanding the risk concomitant with introducing new methods is essential to develop an appropriate validation, implementation, and filing strategy. The process applied at J&J for the first product will be shared in this publication.

支原体检测快速“袋装实验室”NAT方法的实施路线图。
作为微生物控制策略的一部分,支原体检测是所有细胞衍生产品的强制性检测。药典方法包括指示细胞培养法和培养试验。由于培养试验需要28天,因此获得结果的时间(TTR)是微生物实验室中最长的时间之一。此外,药典支原体检测方法复杂、主观,需要严格的实验室隔离,避免与支原体交叉污染。制药行业正在寻求更快的解决方案,比如基于nat的方法。市场上有一些替代的快速NAT方法,可以将TTR减少到大约1(1)天。虽然其中一些NAT方法提供了部分自动化解决方案(例如核酸提取),但其中许多方法仍然需要严格分离测试区域以避免假阳性结果,并且只能提供有限的人工操作减少和简化。相比之下,BioFire®Filmarray®技术是一种NAT方法,由于封闭的过程-所谓的“袋中实验室”-易于使用,并且仅在2(2)小时内提供结果,包括样品制备。除了由于所涉及的有限手工工作而降低人为错误的风险之外,与药典方法相比,自动化还可以提高数据完整性。本文描述了BioFire®Filmarray®技术的实施路线图。提供了基于单克隆抗体的产品从可行性研究到验证和监管提交的方法。作为第一个,强生公司获得了多个机构(包括FDA和EMA)的监管批准,将这项技术应用于生物制药产品,并开始在全球范围内推广到其他产品和测试地点。了解引入新方法所伴随的风险对于开发适当的验证、实现和归档策略至关重要。在强生公司应用的第一个产品的过程将在本出版物中分享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信