Restarting Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Admission for a Gastrointestinal Bleeding Event: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1002/phar.70055
Oluwadolapo D Lawal, Herbert D Aronow, Fisayomi Shobayo, Yichi Zhang, Anne L Hume, Tracey H Taveira, Kelly L Matson, Justin Gold, Xuerong Wen
{"title":"Restarting Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Admission for a Gastrointestinal Bleeding Event: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin.","authors":"Oluwadolapo D Lawal, Herbert D Aronow, Fisayomi Shobayo, Yichi Zhang, Anne L Hume, Tracey H Taveira, Kelly L Matson, Justin Gold, Xuerong Wen","doi":"10.1002/phar.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are sparse data to guide resumption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survive a major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) event.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk-benefit profile of restarting DOACs versus warfarin among patients with AF following hospitalization for major GIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using claims submitted to a commercial health insurance database from January 2010 to December 2017, we identified adult patients with AF hospitalized for a major GIB while receiving oral anticoagulants. Eligible patients were required to have survived and restarted oral anticoagulation with DOACs or warfarin within 90 days following hospital discharge for major GIB. The outcomes of interest were subsequent hospitalization for major bleeding, hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), all-cause mortality, and net adverse clinical effect (NACE), which was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for ischemic stroke/SE, and hospitalization for major bleeding. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance measured covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 4,389 patients resumed oral anticoagulation, with 3016 (68.7%) on warfarin and 1373 (31.3%) on DOACs, within 90 days of hospital discharge for major GIB. The median (interquartile range) time from hospital discharge for major GIB to resumption of oral anticoagulant was 24 (10, 47) days. The weighted hazards ratio (HR) among individuals that resumed DOACs versus warfarin after major GIB was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.60, 0.96) for subsequent hospitalization for major bleeding, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.55) for subsequent hospitalization for ischemic stroke/SE, and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.97) for NACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with AF who survived and resumed oral anticoagulation within the first 90 days after hospitalization for a major GIB event, restarting oral anticoagulation treatment with DOACs was associated with a lower risk of subsequent hospitalization for major bleeding and the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, SE, all-cause mortality, and recurrent or incident major bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are sparse data to guide resumption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survive a major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) event.

Objective: To compare the risk-benefit profile of restarting DOACs versus warfarin among patients with AF following hospitalization for major GIB.

Methods: Using claims submitted to a commercial health insurance database from January 2010 to December 2017, we identified adult patients with AF hospitalized for a major GIB while receiving oral anticoagulants. Eligible patients were required to have survived and restarted oral anticoagulation with DOACs or warfarin within 90 days following hospital discharge for major GIB. The outcomes of interest were subsequent hospitalization for major bleeding, hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), all-cause mortality, and net adverse clinical effect (NACE), which was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for ischemic stroke/SE, and hospitalization for major bleeding. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance measured covariates.

Results: Overall, 4,389 patients resumed oral anticoagulation, with 3016 (68.7%) on warfarin and 1373 (31.3%) on DOACs, within 90 days of hospital discharge for major GIB. The median (interquartile range) time from hospital discharge for major GIB to resumption of oral anticoagulant was 24 (10, 47) days. The weighted hazards ratio (HR) among individuals that resumed DOACs versus warfarin after major GIB was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.60, 0.96) for subsequent hospitalization for major bleeding, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.55) for subsequent hospitalization for ischemic stroke/SE, and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.97) for NACE.

Conclusions: Among patients with AF who survived and resumed oral anticoagulation within the first 90 days after hospitalization for a major GIB event, restarting oral anticoagulation treatment with DOACs was associated with a lower risk of subsequent hospitalization for major bleeding and the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, SE, all-cause mortality, and recurrent or incident major bleeding.

心房颤动患者因消化道出血入院后重新开始口服抗凝:与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝药物的有效性和安全性
背景:对于发生重大胃肠道出血(GIB)事件后存活的心房颤动(AF)患者,指导直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与华法林恢复使用的数据较少。目的:比较在严重GIB住院后房颤患者中重新启动doac与华法林的风险-收益情况。方法:使用2010年1月至2017年12月提交给商业健康保险数据库的索赔,我们确定了因严重GIB住院并接受口服抗凝剂治疗的成年房颤患者。符合条件的患者需要在严重GIB出院后90天内存活并重新使用DOACs或华法林口服抗凝。关注的结局是随后因大出血住院、因缺血性卒中/全身栓塞住院(SE)、全因死亡率和净不良临床反应(NACE), NACE是由全因死亡率、因缺血性卒中/全身栓塞住院和因大出血住院组成的综合结果。采用处理加权的稳定逆概率来平衡测量的协变量。结果:总体而言,4389例严重GIB患者在出院90天内恢复口服抗凝,其中3016例(68.7%)使用华法林,1373例(31.3%)使用DOACs。严重GIB患者从出院到恢复口服抗凝剂的中位时间(四分位数范围)为24(10,47)天。在严重GIB后恢复doac与华法林的个体中,因大出血住院的加权风险比(HR)为0.76(95%置信区间,CI: 0.60, 0.96),因缺血性卒中/SE住院的加权风险比(HR)为0.91 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.55), NACE住院的加权风险比(HR)为0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.97)。结论:在因重大GIB事件住院后90天内恢复口服抗凝治疗并存活的房颤患者中,重新开始口服DOACs抗凝治疗与随后因大出血住院的风险较低以及缺血性卒中、SE、全因死亡率和复发或偶发大出血的综合结局相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信