Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Osteoarthritis and Post-surgical Knee Pain: Systematic Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf115
Napatpaphan Kanjanapanang, Roy Madrid, Peter Lin, Mark Shilling, Amanda Cooper, Hasan Sen, Sherwin Thiyagarajan, Kai-Hua Chang, Henry Luo, Aaron Conger, Zachary L McCormick, Reza Ehsanian
{"title":"Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Osteoarthritis and Post-surgical Knee Pain: Systematic Review.","authors":"Napatpaphan Kanjanapanang, Roy Madrid, Peter Lin, Mark Shilling, Amanda Cooper, Hasan Sen, Sherwin Thiyagarajan, Kai-Hua Chang, Henry Luo, Aaron Conger, Zachary L McCormick, Reza Ehsanian","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GnRFA) for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis or persistent post-surgical knee pain (PPSP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population: Adults ≥ 18 years with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) or PPSP. Intervention: GnRFA. Comparison: Sham, placebo, active treatments, or no comparator. Outcomes: Proportion of individuals with pain score reductions of ≥ 50% or ≥ 2 points or ≥ 30% improvement in functional measures at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Search Strategy and Risk of Bias Assessment: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through April 2024 (PROSPERO ID CRD42024552068). Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tools were used accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1,849 records, with 226 full-texts reviewed and 28 studies included (11 randomized controlled trials and 17 observational studies, totaling 2,218 participants). Pooled success rates for ≥50% pain reduction in both OA and PPSP were 51% (95% CI : 49-54%) at 6 months, 43% (95% CI : 40-47%) at 12 months, and 58% (95% CI : 48-67%) at 24 months. Large lesions showed higher pooled success rates compared to small lesions at 12 months (55% (95%CI : 51-59%) vs. 34% (95%CI : 26-43%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GnRFA is effective in reducing knee pain in the majority of patients with osteoarthritis when large lesion techniques are used with moderate-certainty evidence, according to GRADE. Alternatively, there is low quality evidence that GnRFA results in treatment benefit for individuals with PPSP. These conclusions, however, are limited by small subgroup sample sizes and the lack of a meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GnRFA) for chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis or persistent post-surgical knee pain (PPSP).

Methods: Population: Adults ≥ 18 years with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) or PPSP. Intervention: GnRFA. Comparison: Sham, placebo, active treatments, or no comparator. Outcomes: Proportion of individuals with pain score reductions of ≥ 50% or ≥ 2 points or ≥ 30% improvement in functional measures at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Search Strategy and Risk of Bias Assessment: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through April 2024 (PROSPERO ID CRD42024552068). Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tools were used accordingly.

Results: The search identified 1,849 records, with 226 full-texts reviewed and 28 studies included (11 randomized controlled trials and 17 observational studies, totaling 2,218 participants). Pooled success rates for ≥50% pain reduction in both OA and PPSP were 51% (95% CI : 49-54%) at 6 months, 43% (95% CI : 40-47%) at 12 months, and 58% (95% CI : 48-67%) at 24 months. Large lesions showed higher pooled success rates compared to small lesions at 12 months (55% (95%CI : 51-59%) vs. 34% (95%CI : 26-43%)).

Conclusions: GnRFA is effective in reducing knee pain in the majority of patients with osteoarthritis when large lesion techniques are used with moderate-certainty evidence, according to GRADE. Alternatively, there is low quality evidence that GnRFA results in treatment benefit for individuals with PPSP. These conclusions, however, are limited by small subgroup sample sizes and the lack of a meta-analysis.

膝神经射频消融术治疗骨关节炎和术后膝关节疼痛的有效性:系统综述。
目的:评价膝神经射频消融术(GnRFA)治疗骨关节炎或术后持续性膝关节疼痛(PPSP)所致慢性膝关节疼痛的疗效。方法:人群:年龄≥18岁,患有骨关节炎(OA)或PPSP引起的慢性膝关节疼痛的成年人。干预:GnRFA。比较:假药、安慰剂、积极治疗或无比较物。结果:1、3、6、12、18和24个月疼痛评分降低≥50%或≥2分或功能测量改善≥30%的个体比例。检索策略和偏倚风险评估:检索到2024年4月(PROSPERO ID CRD42024552068)的Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library。相应使用Cochrane偏倚风险2、非随机干预研究的偏倚风险和国家心脏、肺和血液研究所质量评估工具。结果:检索到1849条记录,226篇全文,包括28项研究(11项随机对照试验和17项观察性研究,共计2218名参与者)。6个月时OA和PPSP疼痛减轻≥50%的总成功率为51% (95% CI: 49-54%), 12个月时为43% (95% CI: 40-47%), 24个月时为58% (95% CI: 48-67%)。12个月时,大病变的总成功率高于小病变(55% (95%CI: 51-59%)对34% (95%CI: 26-43%))。结论:根据GRADE,当采用大病变技术时,GnRFA可有效减轻大多数骨关节炎患者的膝关节疼痛。另外,有低质量的证据表明GnRFA对PPSP患者的治疗有益。然而,这些结论受到小亚组样本量和缺乏荟萃分析的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信