Real-World Impact on Postoperative Vomiting by Changing Anesthesia Regimens in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Taiki Kojima, Yusuke Yamauchi, Sayuri Yasuda, Soichiro Obara, Takashi Fujiwara, Aya Sueda
{"title":"Real-World Impact on Postoperative Vomiting by Changing Anesthesia Regimens in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.","authors":"Taiki Kojima, Yusuke Yamauchi, Sayuri Yasuda, Soichiro Obara, Takashi Fujiwara, Aya Sueda","doi":"10.1111/pan.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive measures for postoperative vomiting (POV) in pediatric strabismus surgery are essential. Previous experimental studies have shown the independent antiemetic effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), dexamethasone (DEX), and ondansetron (OND). However, the real-world outcomes of POV following the combined use of DEX and OND with propofol/opioid TIVA remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the longitudinal incidence of POV across three phases of different anesthesia regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single tertiary-care children's hospital in Japan, including children aged < 18 years who underwent strabismus surgery and had no major comorbidities. The primary outcome was either POV or the use of antiemetics within 24 h or by discharge. Changes in the levels and time-trend slopes of POV were evaluated using interrupted time series analysis among three phases: (1) sevoflurane with pentazocine, (2) propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX, and (3) propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX and OND.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2378 children, the POV incidence in Phases 1, 2, and 3 was 109/471 (23.1%), 87/1260 (6.9%), and 28/647 (4.3%), respectively (p < 0.001). A significant level change in POV occurrence was observed from Phase 1 to Phase 2, while no significant level change was found from Phase 2 to Phase 3. The time-trend changes in POV occurrence showed no significant difference during Phases 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world departmental-level data showed a decrease in POV occurrence after transitioning from sevoflurane-based anesthesia with pentazocine to propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX. However, no significant decrease in POV occurrence was found by adding OND to propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX. Further studies are needed to improve the generalizability of evaluating the real-world antiemetic effect of combining antiemetic medications on propofol/opioid TIVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventive measures for postoperative vomiting (POV) in pediatric strabismus surgery are essential. Previous experimental studies have shown the independent antiemetic effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), dexamethasone (DEX), and ondansetron (OND). However, the real-world outcomes of POV following the combined use of DEX and OND with propofol/opioid TIVA remain unknown.

Aims: To evaluate the longitudinal incidence of POV across three phases of different anesthesia regimens.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single tertiary-care children's hospital in Japan, including children aged < 18 years who underwent strabismus surgery and had no major comorbidities. The primary outcome was either POV or the use of antiemetics within 24 h or by discharge. Changes in the levels and time-trend slopes of POV were evaluated using interrupted time series analysis among three phases: (1) sevoflurane with pentazocine, (2) propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX, and (3) propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX and OND.

Results: Of the 2378 children, the POV incidence in Phases 1, 2, and 3 was 109/471 (23.1%), 87/1260 (6.9%), and 28/647 (4.3%), respectively (p < 0.001). A significant level change in POV occurrence was observed from Phase 1 to Phase 2, while no significant level change was found from Phase 2 to Phase 3. The time-trend changes in POV occurrence showed no significant difference during Phases 2 and 3.

Conclusions: Real-world departmental-level data showed a decrease in POV occurrence after transitioning from sevoflurane-based anesthesia with pentazocine to propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX. However, no significant decrease in POV occurrence was found by adding OND to propofol/opioid TIVA with DEX. Further studies are needed to improve the generalizability of evaluating the real-world antiemetic effect of combining antiemetic medications on propofol/opioid TIVA.

斜视手术儿童麻醉方案改变对术后呕吐的影响:中断时间序列分析。
背景:预防儿童斜视手术术后呕吐(POV)是必要的。先前的实验研究表明,以异丙酚为基础的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)、地塞米松(DEX)和昂丹西琼(OND)具有独立的止吐作用。然而,DEX和OND联合使用异丙酚/阿片类药物TIVA后POV的实际结果仍然未知。目的:评价不同麻醉方案的三个阶段POV的纵向发生率。方法:本回顾性观察研究在日本一家三级儿童医院进行,包括年龄的儿童。结果:在2378名儿童中,第1、2和3期的POV发生率分别为109/471(23.1%)、87/1260(6.9%)和28/647(4.3%)。(p)结论:真实科室数据显示,从七氟烷为基础的戊唑嗪麻醉过渡到异丙酚/阿片类药物的TIVA与DEX后,POV发生率降低。然而,在异丙酚/阿片类药物TIVA中加入OND并没有明显降低POV的发生率。在异丙酚/阿片类药物TIVA联合止吐药物的实际止吐效果评估中,需要进一步的研究来提高其通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信