Hamstring Injuries in Major League Soccer: A 10-Year Analysis of Injury Rate, Return to Play, and Performance Metrics by Player Position.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251360422
Brian Forsythe, Camden Bohn, Catherine Hand, Francis Hand, Daanish Khazi-Syed, Joshua Chang, Harmanjeet Singh, Andrew Savoia, Jonathan Spaan, Kyle Borque, Rachel Frank
{"title":"Hamstring Injuries in Major League Soccer: A 10-Year Analysis of Injury Rate, Return to Play, and Performance Metrics by Player Position.","authors":"Brian Forsythe, Camden Bohn, Catherine Hand, Francis Hand, Daanish Khazi-Syed, Joshua Chang, Harmanjeet Singh, Andrew Savoia, Jonathan Spaan, Kyle Borque, Rachel Frank","doi":"10.1177/23259671251360422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hamstring injuries are common in athletes performing high-intensity sports, such as soccer, impacting performance and return to play (RTP) times. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hamstring injuries on RTP and performance among Major League Soccer (MLS) players over 10 years.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of hamstring injuries on RTP times and performance metrics among MLS players over 10 years, with a focus on injury characteristics, rehabilitation practices, and positional differences.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2010 to 2021, 2715 MLS players with hamstring injuries were identified by the MLS Injury Surveillance Database and analyzed. RTP times, injury rates, and reinjury rates were compared between the 2010-2015 and 2016-2021 cohorts. Performance metrics (games, minutes, goals, and assists) were extracted. Uninjured controls were matched 2 to1 by position, age, and experience. <i>T</i> tests were used to assess postinjury performance differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Game-related injuries required longer RTP than practice injuries (27.8 vs 21.9 days; <i>P</i> = .023), and acute noncontact injuries took more time to recover than chronic injuries (24.9 vs 13.2 days; <i>P</i> < .0001). RTP times increased in the 2016-2021 cohort compared with the 2010-2015 cohort for minimal/first-degree injuries (15.09 ± 31.29 vs 10.13 ± 28.53 days; <i>P</i> = .018) and overall (20.26 vs 13.60 days; <i>P</i> = .002), despite stable injury rates (<i>P</i> = .405). Reinjury rates decreased nonsignificantly (<i>P</i> = .603); however, RTP after reinjury was longer in the 2016-2021 cohort (25.05 vs 10.03 days; <i>P</i> = .025). Defenders saw reduced minutes played 2 years after injury compared with controls (-221.60 ± 833.66 vs -34.80 ± 792.11; <i>P</i> = .007). RTP times were unaffected by playing surface grass versus turf (<i>P</i> = .620) or player position (forward, midfielder, defender, and goalkeeper) (<i>P</i> = .900).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Injury rates were unchanged in the 2010-2015 and 2016-2021cohorts; however, RTP times increased in the latter cohort, especially for recurrent injuries. Game-related and acute noncontact injuries required longer RTP, and defenders showed the greatest performance decline. Future studies are needed to further highlight mechanisms of injury and treatment for preventative protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 8","pages":"23259671251360422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251360422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hamstring injuries are common in athletes performing high-intensity sports, such as soccer, impacting performance and return to play (RTP) times. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of hamstring injuries on RTP and performance among Major League Soccer (MLS) players over 10 years.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of hamstring injuries on RTP times and performance metrics among MLS players over 10 years, with a focus on injury characteristics, rehabilitation practices, and positional differences.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: From 2010 to 2021, 2715 MLS players with hamstring injuries were identified by the MLS Injury Surveillance Database and analyzed. RTP times, injury rates, and reinjury rates were compared between the 2010-2015 and 2016-2021 cohorts. Performance metrics (games, minutes, goals, and assists) were extracted. Uninjured controls were matched 2 to1 by position, age, and experience. T tests were used to assess postinjury performance differences.

Results: Game-related injuries required longer RTP than practice injuries (27.8 vs 21.9 days; P = .023), and acute noncontact injuries took more time to recover than chronic injuries (24.9 vs 13.2 days; P < .0001). RTP times increased in the 2016-2021 cohort compared with the 2010-2015 cohort for minimal/first-degree injuries (15.09 ± 31.29 vs 10.13 ± 28.53 days; P = .018) and overall (20.26 vs 13.60 days; P = .002), despite stable injury rates (P = .405). Reinjury rates decreased nonsignificantly (P = .603); however, RTP after reinjury was longer in the 2016-2021 cohort (25.05 vs 10.03 days; P = .025). Defenders saw reduced minutes played 2 years after injury compared with controls (-221.60 ± 833.66 vs -34.80 ± 792.11; P = .007). RTP times were unaffected by playing surface grass versus turf (P = .620) or player position (forward, midfielder, defender, and goalkeeper) (P = .900).

Conclusion: Injury rates were unchanged in the 2010-2015 and 2016-2021cohorts; however, RTP times increased in the latter cohort, especially for recurrent injuries. Game-related and acute noncontact injuries required longer RTP, and defenders showed the greatest performance decline. Future studies are needed to further highlight mechanisms of injury and treatment for preventative protocols.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国职业足球大联盟的腿筋损伤:10年伤病率分析,球员位置的恢复和表现指标。
背景:腿筋损伤在运动员进行高强度运动(如足球)时很常见,影响运动员的表现和恢复比赛(RTP)时间。本研究旨在评估10年来美国职业足球大联盟(MLS)球员腿筋损伤对RTP和表现的影响。目的:评估10年来MLS球员腿筋损伤对RTP时间和表现指标的影响,重点关注损伤特征、康复实践和位置差异。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:对2010 - 2021年美国职业足球大联盟伤病监测数据库中发现的2715名腿筋损伤球员进行分析。比较了2010-2015年和2016-2021年的RTP时间、受伤率和再受伤率。我们提取了表现指标(游戏邦注:包括比赛、分钟数、进球和助攻)。未受伤的对照组按位置、年龄和经验进行2:1的匹配。采用T检验评估损伤后表现差异。结果:比赛相关损伤所需的RTP时间比练习损伤长(27.8天比21.9天,P = 0.023),急性非接触损伤比慢性损伤需要更多的恢复时间(24.9天比13.2天,P < 0.0001)。与2010-2015年队列相比,2016-2021年队列中轻度/一级损伤的RTP时间(15.09±31.29天和10.13±28.53天,P = 0.018)和总体RTP时间(20.26天和13.60天,P = 0.002)有所增加,尽管损伤率保持稳定(P = 0.405)。再损伤率无显著性降低(P = 0.603);然而,在2016-2021队列中,再损伤后的RTP更长(25.05天vs 10.03天;P = 0.025)。与对照组相比,后卫在受伤后2年的上场时间减少(-221.60±833.66 vs -34.80±792.11;P = .007)。RTP时间不受地面草地与人造草坪(P = 0.620)或球员位置(前锋、中场、后卫和守门员)(P = 0.900)的影响。结论:2010-2015年和2016-2021年队列的损伤率没有变化;然而,RTP时间在后一组中增加,特别是对于复发性损伤。与比赛相关和急性非接触性受伤需要更长的RTP,防守队员表现出最大的下降。未来的研究需要进一步强调损伤机制和预防方案的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信