Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Interlaminar Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study of 176 Cases With a 3-6 Year Follow-Up.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1111/os.70131
Zhifa Zhang, Zhiyong Yin, Rongqiang Bu, Xiangyu Wang, Benzhang Tao, Leiming Zhang, Xifeng Zhang, Jianning Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Interlaminar Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study of 176 Cases With a 3-6 Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Zhifa Zhang, Zhiyong Yin, Rongqiang Bu, Xiangyu Wang, Benzhang Tao, Leiming Zhang, Xifeng Zhang, Jianning Zhang","doi":"10.1111/os.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spinal endoscopic surgery is widely acknowledged as an effective and minimally invasive approach for treating lumbar disc herniation. Comprehensive descriptions of the endoscopic decompression technique for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are limited in existing literature. With a focus on long-term follow-up outcomes, this study investigates the safety and efficacy of endoscopic decompression using a unilateral interlaminar approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 1, 2018, and December 1, 2020, a total of 316 consecutive cases underwent endoscopic decompression for LSS following conservative treatment. Based on specific selection criteria, 176 of these cases were retrospectively included in this study. The minimally invasive decompression was performed using a percutaneous uniportal and lateral interlaminar endoscopic approach under local anesthesia. This endoscopic procedure involved comprehensive decompression of the central canal and unilateral recess, addressing the lamina, hypertrophic ligamentum flavum (LF), and medial osteophytes of the facet joint. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the single continuous walking distance (SCWD) without pain, the modified MacNab criteria, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiographic changes, both preoperative and postoperative, were documented and analyzed. This analysis included evaluating the stability of the lumbar spine through lumbar hyper-flexion and hyper-extension X-rays, as well as determining the lumbar canal cross-sectional area (CCA) using CT scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up period was 47.4 ± 7.1 months. The average operative duration was 65.3 ± 12.6 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 10.4 ± 8.5 mL. The average length of postoperative hospital stay was 2.2 ± 1.3 days. There was a significant improvement in SCWD without pain (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the ODI and VAS scores for both back and leg pain showed significant reductions (p < 0.05). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the overall rate of good-to-excellent outcomes was 95.45%. The CCA increased significantly from 52.0 ± 11.0 to 122.5 ± 12.1 mm<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05). The stability of the spine did not exhibit significant changes compared to the preoperative state.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral endoscopic decompression in the treatment of LSS demonstrated both safety and efficacy, as evidenced by clinical and radiographic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2992-3001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spinal endoscopic surgery is widely acknowledged as an effective and minimally invasive approach for treating lumbar disc herniation. Comprehensive descriptions of the endoscopic decompression technique for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are limited in existing literature. With a focus on long-term follow-up outcomes, this study investigates the safety and efficacy of endoscopic decompression using a unilateral interlaminar approach.

Methods: Between August 1, 2018, and December 1, 2020, a total of 316 consecutive cases underwent endoscopic decompression for LSS following conservative treatment. Based on specific selection criteria, 176 of these cases were retrospectively included in this study. The minimally invasive decompression was performed using a percutaneous uniportal and lateral interlaminar endoscopic approach under local anesthesia. This endoscopic procedure involved comprehensive decompression of the central canal and unilateral recess, addressing the lamina, hypertrophic ligamentum flavum (LF), and medial osteophytes of the facet joint. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the single continuous walking distance (SCWD) without pain, the modified MacNab criteria, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Radiographic changes, both preoperative and postoperative, were documented and analyzed. This analysis included evaluating the stability of the lumbar spine through lumbar hyper-flexion and hyper-extension X-rays, as well as determining the lumbar canal cross-sectional area (CCA) using CT scans.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 47.4 ± 7.1 months. The average operative duration was 65.3 ± 12.6 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 10.4 ± 8.5 mL. The average length of postoperative hospital stay was 2.2 ± 1.3 days. There was a significant improvement in SCWD without pain (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the ODI and VAS scores for both back and leg pain showed significant reductions (p < 0.05). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the overall rate of good-to-excellent outcomes was 95.45%. The CCA increased significantly from 52.0 ± 11.0 to 122.5 ± 12.1 mm2 (p < 0.05). The stability of the spine did not exhibit significant changes compared to the preoperative state.

Conclusions: The unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral endoscopic decompression in the treatment of LSS demonstrated both safety and efficacy, as evidenced by clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单侧椎板间内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效和安全性:176例随访3-6年的回顾性研究。
目的:脊柱内窥镜手术被广泛认为是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的一种有效的微创方法。对腰椎管狭窄(LSS)的内镜减压技术的全面描述在现有文献中是有限的。本研究着眼于长期随访结果,探讨单侧椎板间入路内镜减压的安全性和有效性。方法:2018年8月1日至2020年12月1日,共316例保守治疗后连续行内镜减压治疗LSS。根据特定的选择标准,本研究回顾性纳入176例病例。在局部麻醉下,采用经皮单门静脉和外侧板间内镜入路进行微创减压。该内镜手术包括对中央椎管和单侧隐窝进行全面减压,处理椎板、肥大黄韧带(LF)和小关节内侧骨赘。临床结果采用无疼痛单次连续步行距离(SCWD)、改良MacNab标准、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。术前和术后的影像学变化均被记录和分析。该分析包括通过腰椎超屈曲和超伸x线评估腰椎的稳定性,以及通过CT扫描确定腰椎管横截面积(CCA)。结果:平均随访时间47.4±7.1个月。平均手术时间65.3±12.6 min,平均估计失血量10.4±8.5 mL。术后平均住院时间为2.2±1.3天。结论:临床和影像学结果证明,单侧椎板间入路双侧内镜减压治疗LSS具有安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信