Cost Comparison of Sports Medicine Procedures in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Versus Hospital Outpatient Departments for Medicare Recipients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251333110
Johnathon R McCormick, William E Harkin, Vincent P Federico, Vince K Morgan, Robert B Browning, Luis M Salazar, Garrett R Jackson, Zeeshan A Khan, Daniel J Kaplan, Nikhil N Verma, Brian J Cole, Jorge Chahla
{"title":"Cost Comparison of Sports Medicine Procedures in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Versus Hospital Outpatient Departments for Medicare Recipients.","authors":"Johnathon R McCormick, William E Harkin, Vincent P Federico, Vince K Morgan, Robert B Browning, Luis M Salazar, Garrett R Jackson, Zeeshan A Khan, Daniel J Kaplan, Nikhil N Verma, Brian J Cole, Jorge Chahla","doi":"10.1177/23259671251333110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare costs in the United States are rising in conjunction with an increased utilization of outpatient centers, particularly in sports medicine.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to utilize Medicare data to compare the overall cost of sports medicine procedures performed in the ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings. The secondary purpose of this study was to compare facility fees, surgeon fees, Medicare payments, and patient payments between ASCs and HOPDs. It was hypothesized that procedures performed at ASCs would demonstrate a lower overall cost than those performed at HOPDs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) were accessed via the Medicare Procedure Price Lookup Tool. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify sports medicine procedures approved for the outpatient setting by CMS. Facility fees, surgeon fees, total costs, Medicare payments, and patient payments were extracted. Descriptive statistics were utilized to calculate the mean and standard deviation for each category of fee and payment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 CPT codes were identified. Compared with HOPDs, shoulder procedures (n = 25) at ASCs had lower total costs ($3622 ± $1160 vs $6261 ± $1759; <i>P</i> < .001), facility fees ($2777 ± $1020 vs $5416 ± $1606; <i>P</i> < .001), Medicare payments ($2898 ± $928 vs $5009 ± $1407; <i>P</i> < .001), and patient payments ($724 ± $232 vs $1252 ± $352; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with HOPDs. Knee procedures (n = 31) at ASCs had lower total costs ($4236 ± $2741 vs $6668 ± $3341; <i>P</i> = .006), facility fees ($3408 ± $2507 vs $5840 ± $3116; <i>P</i> = .006), Medicare payments ($3389 ± $2193 vs $5458 ± $2955; <i>P</i> = .006), and patient payments ($847 ± $548 vs $1209 ± $429; <i>P</i> = .011). Hip procedures (n = 6) at ASCs had lower total costs ($3583 ± $698 vs $6671± $1451; <i>P</i> = .025), facility fees ($2725 ± $669 vs $5813 ± $1431; <i>P</i> = .025), Medicare payments ($2866 ± $558 vs $5336 ± $1161; <i>P</i> = .025), and patient payments ($716 ± $139 vs $1333 ± $290; <i>P</i> = .025) compared with HOPDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that sports medicine procedures performed at ASCs for Medicare recipients result in considerable overall total cost savings when compared with those performed at HOPDs. Sports medicine providers should be aware of differences in costs when determining the best setting for these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 8","pages":"23259671251333110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251333110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare costs in the United States are rising in conjunction with an increased utilization of outpatient centers, particularly in sports medicine.

Purpose/hypothesis: The primary purpose of this study was to utilize Medicare data to compare the overall cost of sports medicine procedures performed in the ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings. The secondary purpose of this study was to compare facility fees, surgeon fees, Medicare payments, and patient payments between ASCs and HOPDs. It was hypothesized that procedures performed at ASCs would demonstrate a lower overall cost than those performed at HOPDs.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) were accessed via the Medicare Procedure Price Lookup Tool. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify sports medicine procedures approved for the outpatient setting by CMS. Facility fees, surgeon fees, total costs, Medicare payments, and patient payments were extracted. Descriptive statistics were utilized to calculate the mean and standard deviation for each category of fee and payment.

Results: A total of 62 CPT codes were identified. Compared with HOPDs, shoulder procedures (n = 25) at ASCs had lower total costs ($3622 ± $1160 vs $6261 ± $1759; P < .001), facility fees ($2777 ± $1020 vs $5416 ± $1606; P < .001), Medicare payments ($2898 ± $928 vs $5009 ± $1407; P < .001), and patient payments ($724 ± $232 vs $1252 ± $352; P < .001) compared with HOPDs. Knee procedures (n = 31) at ASCs had lower total costs ($4236 ± $2741 vs $6668 ± $3341; P = .006), facility fees ($3408 ± $2507 vs $5840 ± $3116; P = .006), Medicare payments ($3389 ± $2193 vs $5458 ± $2955; P = .006), and patient payments ($847 ± $548 vs $1209 ± $429; P = .011). Hip procedures (n = 6) at ASCs had lower total costs ($3583 ± $698 vs $6671± $1451; P = .025), facility fees ($2725 ± $669 vs $5813 ± $1431; P = .025), Medicare payments ($2866 ± $558 vs $5336 ± $1161; P = .025), and patient payments ($716 ± $139 vs $1333 ± $290; P = .025) compared with HOPDs.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that sports medicine procedures performed at ASCs for Medicare recipients result in considerable overall total cost savings when compared with those performed at HOPDs. Sports medicine providers should be aware of differences in costs when determining the best setting for these procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医疗保险接受者在门诊手术中心和医院门诊的运动医学程序的成本比较。
背景:美国的医疗费用随着门诊中心使用率的增加而上升,尤其是在运动医学方面。目的/假设:本研究的主要目的是利用医疗保险数据来比较在门诊手术中心(ASCs)和医院门诊部(HOPD)进行的运动医学手术的总体成本。本研究的第二个目的是比较ASCs和hopd之间的设施费用、外科手术费用、医疗保险支付和患者支付。假设在ASCs进行的手术比在hopd进行的手术总体成本更低。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:通过医疗保险程序价格查找工具访问医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的公开数据。现行程序术语(CPT)代码用于识别CMS批准的门诊设置的运动医学程序。提取了设施费用、外科手术费用、总费用、医疗保险支付和患者支付。采用描述性统计方法计算每一类费用和支付的平均值和标准差。结果:共鉴定出62个CPT编码。与hopd相比,ASCs肩部手术(n = 25)的总成本(3622±1160美元vs 6261±1759美元,P < 0.001)、设施费用(2777±1020美元vs 5416±1606美元,P < 0.001)、医疗保险支付(2898±928美元vs 5009±1407美元,P < 0.001)和患者支付(724±232美元vs 1252±352美元,P < 0.001)低于hopd。ASCs的膝关节手术(n = 31)总成本(4236±2741美元vs 6668±3341美元;P = 0.006)、设备费用(3408±2507美元vs 5840±3116美元;P = 0.006)、医疗保险支付(3389±2193美元vs 5458±2955美元;P = 0.006)和患者支付(847±548美元vs 1209±429美元;P = 0.011)较低。与hopd相比,ASCs的髋关节手术(n = 6)总成本(3583±698美元vs 6671±1451美元,P = 0.025)、设施费用(2725±669美元vs 5813±1431美元,P = 0.025)、医疗保险支付(2866±558美元vs 5336±1161美元,P = 0.025)和患者支付(716±139美元vs 1333±290美元,P = 0.025)较低。结论:我们的研究表明,与hopd相比,在ASCs为医疗保险受助人进行的运动医学手术可以节省相当大的总成本。在确定这些程序的最佳设置时,运动医学提供者应该意识到成本的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信