Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of all-cause mortality: a population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Talip E Eroglu, Ruben Coronel, Patrick C Souverein
{"title":"Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of all-cause mortality: a population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.","authors":"Talip E Eroglu, Ruben Coronel, Patrick C Souverein","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2025-003254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) have a direct cardiac effect that is independent of their glucose-lowering renal effect. We investigated the relation between SGLT-2is and all-cause mortality compared with (1) dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and (2) metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes among subjects with a diabetes duration of <5 years at cohort entry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study was conducted among patients initiating a new antidiabetic drug class between January 2013 and September 2020 by extracting data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The HR of all-cause mortality comparing (1) SGLT-2is versus DPP-4is in type 2 diabetes and (2) SGLT-2is versus metformin monotherapy among subjects with a diabetes duration of <5 years at cohort entry was calculated using Cox regression. Stratified analyses were performed according to sex and the presence of cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 152 591 new users of antidiabetic drugs, with 15 125 SGLT-2i users, 31 896 DPP-4i users, 15 723 other second-line to third-line antidiabetic drug users and 89 847 first-line antidiabetic drug users at cohort entry. After adjusting for all relevant confounders, SGLT-2i use was associated with a reduced rate of all-cause mortality compared with metformin monotherapy (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.93) or DPP4-i (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.63). This reduced rate of all-cause mortality appeared to be independent of sex and cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a reduced risk of all-cause mortality with SGLT-2is compared with DPP-4is or metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes among subjects with a diabetes duration of <5 years at cohort entry.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) have a direct cardiac effect that is independent of their glucose-lowering renal effect. We investigated the relation between SGLT-2is and all-cause mortality compared with (1) dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and (2) metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes among subjects with a diabetes duration of <5 years at cohort entry.

Methods: A cohort study was conducted among patients initiating a new antidiabetic drug class between January 2013 and September 2020 by extracting data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The HR of all-cause mortality comparing (1) SGLT-2is versus DPP-4is in type 2 diabetes and (2) SGLT-2is versus metformin monotherapy among subjects with a diabetes duration of <5 years at cohort entry was calculated using Cox regression. Stratified analyses were performed according to sex and the presence of cardiovascular disease.

Results: The cohort consisted of 152 591 new users of antidiabetic drugs, with 15 125 SGLT-2i users, 31 896 DPP-4i users, 15 723 other second-line to third-line antidiabetic drug users and 89 847 first-line antidiabetic drug users at cohort entry. After adjusting for all relevant confounders, SGLT-2i use was associated with a reduced rate of all-cause mortality compared with metformin monotherapy (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.93) or DPP4-i (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.63). This reduced rate of all-cause mortality appeared to be independent of sex and cardiovascular disease.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a reduced risk of all-cause mortality with SGLT-2is compared with DPP-4is or metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes among subjects with a diabetes duration of <5 years at cohort entry.

Abstract Image

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂与全因死亡率风险:使用英国临床实践研究数据链的基于人群的队列研究
目的:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT-2is)具有直接的心脏作用,独立于其降血糖肾作用。我们研究了SGLT-2is与2型糖尿病患者全因死亡率之间的关系(1)二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4is)和(2)二甲双胍单药治疗2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病持续时间:方法:通过提取英国临床实践研究数据链的数据,对2013年1月至2020年9月期间开始使用新抗糖尿病药物类别的患者进行了队列研究。(1) 2型糖尿病患者中SGLT-2is与DPP-4is的全因死亡率比较;(2)糖尿病患者持续时间中SGLT-2is与二甲双胍单药治疗的全因死亡率比较。结果:该队列包括152591名降糖药新使用者,其中15125名SGLT-2i使用者,31896名DPP-4i使用者,15723名其他二线至三线降糖药使用者和88947名一线降糖药使用者。在对所有相关混杂因素进行调整后,与二甲双胍单药治疗相比,SGLT-2i的使用与全因死亡率降低相关(HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64至0.93)或DPP4-i (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.51至0.63)。这种全因死亡率的降低似乎与性别和心血管疾病无关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与dpp -4或二甲双胍单药治疗相比,sglt -2治疗2型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率风险降低
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信