The NEON (Nerve rEpair Or Not) trial: a randomized controlled trial of microsurgical repair versus nerve alignment for digital nerve injury.

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Justin C R Wormald,Matthew D Gardiner,Christina Jerosch-Herold,Jonathan Cook,Rafael Pinedo Villanueva,Ciaron O'Hanlon,Naomi Vides,Gianluca Fabiano,Scott Parsons,Loretta Davies,Heidi Fletcher,Molly Glaze,Cushla Cooper,Dominic Power,Abhilash Jain,David Beard,
{"title":"The NEON (Nerve rEpair Or Not) trial: a randomized controlled trial of microsurgical repair versus nerve alignment for digital nerve injury.","authors":"Justin C R Wormald,Matthew D Gardiner,Christina Jerosch-Herold,Jonathan Cook,Rafael Pinedo Villanueva,Ciaron O'Hanlon,Naomi Vides,Gianluca Fabiano,Scott Parsons,Loretta Davies,Heidi Fletcher,Molly Glaze,Cushla Cooper,Dominic Power,Abhilash Jain,David Beard, ","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDigital nerves provide sensibility to the fingers. They are commonly injured through accidental sharp laceration. The aim of the NEON (Nerve rEpair Or Not) study was to investigate whether microsurgical suture repair of lacerated digital nerves is superior to nerve alignment alone without suture repair.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA two-arm, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre RCT was undertaken over 2 years. Participants with suspected unilateral digital nerve injury underwent surgical exploration and were randomized to microsurgical suture repair or nerve alignment alone. The primary outcome was the Impact of Hand Nerve Disorders (I-HaND v2) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) at 12 months post-randomization. Secondary outcomes assessed were: objective neurosensory and functional recovery; health-related quality of life to examine cost-effectiveness; complications of surgery and clinically problematic neuroma rates (Elliot score). Both participants and assessors were blind to allocation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 122 adults were randomized to microsurgical suture repair (n = 61) or nerve alignment alone (n = 61). Primary outcome data using the I-HaND (v2) were available for 106 participants (87%) at 12 months. There were no statistically significant differences in I-HaND scores at all time points, including the 12-month primary end point (15.9 versus 20.2, P = 0.09; 95% c.i. [-0.9, 10.8]). There were also no differences in all secondary outcome measures, including Patient Evaluation Measure and EQ-5D-5L scores at 12 months. Complications were similar at 6 weeks and 12 months. The trial was closed early by the funder owing to slow recruitment and did not reach the intended sample size.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBased on the available data from the NEON trial, there is no evidence to support the beneficial effect of suture repair over nerve alignment alone for isolated digital nerve injury. This multicentre RCT can be used to inform future trials, inform patients and guide clinical practice.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nNIHR Health Technology Assessment (NIHR127807-18/37).\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nISRCTN16211574.","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Digital nerves provide sensibility to the fingers. They are commonly injured through accidental sharp laceration. The aim of the NEON (Nerve rEpair Or Not) study was to investigate whether microsurgical suture repair of lacerated digital nerves is superior to nerve alignment alone without suture repair. METHODS A two-arm, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre RCT was undertaken over 2 years. Participants with suspected unilateral digital nerve injury underwent surgical exploration and were randomized to microsurgical suture repair or nerve alignment alone. The primary outcome was the Impact of Hand Nerve Disorders (I-HaND v2) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) at 12 months post-randomization. Secondary outcomes assessed were: objective neurosensory and functional recovery; health-related quality of life to examine cost-effectiveness; complications of surgery and clinically problematic neuroma rates (Elliot score). Both participants and assessors were blind to allocation. RESULTS A total of 122 adults were randomized to microsurgical suture repair (n = 61) or nerve alignment alone (n = 61). Primary outcome data using the I-HaND (v2) were available for 106 participants (87%) at 12 months. There were no statistically significant differences in I-HaND scores at all time points, including the 12-month primary end point (15.9 versus 20.2, P = 0.09; 95% c.i. [-0.9, 10.8]). There were also no differences in all secondary outcome measures, including Patient Evaluation Measure and EQ-5D-5L scores at 12 months. Complications were similar at 6 weeks and 12 months. The trial was closed early by the funder owing to slow recruitment and did not reach the intended sample size. CONCLUSION Based on the available data from the NEON trial, there is no evidence to support the beneficial effect of suture repair over nerve alignment alone for isolated digital nerve injury. This multicentre RCT can be used to inform future trials, inform patients and guide clinical practice. FUNDING NIHR Health Technology Assessment (NIHR127807-18/37). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN16211574.
NEON(神经修复与否)试验:指神经损伤的显微外科修复与神经对齐的随机对照试验。
数字神经为手指提供敏感性。它们通常因意外的尖锐撕裂伤而受伤。NEON(神经修复或不修复)研究的目的是探讨显微外科缝合修复撕裂的指神经是否优于单纯神经对准而不缝合修复。方法采用双臂、平行组、双盲、多中心随机对照试验,时间超过2年。怀疑单侧指神经损伤的参与者接受手术探查,随机分为显微外科缝合修复组或单独神经对准组。主要结局是随机分组后12个月患者报告的手神经障碍(I-HaND v2)结果测量(PROM)的影响。评估的次要结局是:客观神经感觉和功能恢复;与健康有关的生活质量,以审查成本效益;手术并发症和临床问题神经瘤发生率(Elliot评分)。参与者和评估者都对分配视而不见。结果122例成人随机分为显微外科缝合修复组(n = 61)和单纯神经对准组(n = 61)。在12个月时,106名参与者(87%)使用I-HaND (v2)获得了主要结局数据。包括12个月主要终点在内的所有时间点I-HaND评分均无统计学差异(15.9比20.2,P = 0.09; 95% ci[-0.9, 10.8])。所有次要结局指标也没有差异,包括12个月时患者评价量表和EQ-5D-5L评分。6周和12个月时的并发症相似。由于招募缓慢,试验被资助者提前结束,没有达到预期的样本量。结论根据NEON试验的现有数据,没有证据支持缝线修复比单纯神经对准对孤立性指神经损伤的有益效果。该多中心随机对照试验可用于为未来的试验提供信息,为患者提供信息并指导临床实践。国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估(NIHR127807-18/37)。试验注册号为rctn16211574。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信