Implementation of a continuous glucose monitoring workflow in a complex primary care clinic.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Jack Weisskohl, Dana Burns, Evan Sisson, Kathryn Reid
{"title":"Implementation of a continuous glucose monitoring workflow in a complex primary care clinic.","authors":"Jack Weisskohl, Dana Burns, Evan Sisson, Kathryn Reid","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are supported by national clinical practice guidelines for glucose monitoring in many people with diabetes. However, CGM data are often underutilized in primary care settings, where most adults with diabetes are treated.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Despite a growing patient population using CGM in a complex primary care clinic, the clinic lacks a structured workflow process for manually uploading CGM reports to the electronic health record. As a result, CGM data are inconsistently used by primary care providers for clinical decision-making during routine visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology, workflow processes for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), doctors of medicine (MDs), family nurse practitioners (FNPs), and clinical pharmacists (PharmDs) were examined and improved to support the project goals.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients actively using CGM were identified daily. Assigned clinic nurses (n = 3; 1 RN and 2 LPNs) uploaded CGM logs as precharting to the visit, which were then used by providers (n = 3; 1 MD and 2 FNPs) during clinical encounters. When nurses were not available, the MD, FNPs, or PharmD (n = 1) completed the workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ambulatory glucose profiles were uploaded to precharting in 43 of 45 patients (96%) with active CGM during the project evaluation period. Providers discussed CGM in 38 (88%) of these cases, using it correctly 100% of the time. The current procedural terminology code 95251 was billed in 35 (92%) of the applicable visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interprofessional teamwork to implement clinic workflow process improvements supports the delivery of guideline-driven diabetes care for adults using CGM.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are supported by national clinical practice guidelines for glucose monitoring in many people with diabetes. However, CGM data are often underutilized in primary care settings, where most adults with diabetes are treated.

Local problem: Despite a growing patient population using CGM in a complex primary care clinic, the clinic lacks a structured workflow process for manually uploading CGM reports to the electronic health record. As a result, CGM data are inconsistently used by primary care providers for clinical decision-making during routine visits.

Methods: Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology, workflow processes for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), doctors of medicine (MDs), family nurse practitioners (FNPs), and clinical pharmacists (PharmDs) were examined and improved to support the project goals.

Interventions: Patients actively using CGM were identified daily. Assigned clinic nurses (n = 3; 1 RN and 2 LPNs) uploaded CGM logs as precharting to the visit, which were then used by providers (n = 3; 1 MD and 2 FNPs) during clinical encounters. When nurses were not available, the MD, FNPs, or PharmD (n = 1) completed the workflow.

Results: Ambulatory glucose profiles were uploaded to precharting in 43 of 45 patients (96%) with active CGM during the project evaluation period. Providers discussed CGM in 38 (88%) of these cases, using it correctly 100% of the time. The current procedural terminology code 95251 was billed in 35 (92%) of the applicable visits.

Conclusions: Interprofessional teamwork to implement clinic workflow process improvements supports the delivery of guideline-driven diabetes care for adults using CGM.

在复杂的初级保健诊所中实现连续血糖监测工作流程。
背景:连续血糖监测仪(CGM)在许多糖尿病患者的血糖监测中得到国家临床实践指南的支持。然而,在大多数成人糖尿病患者接受治疗的初级保健机构中,CGM数据往往未得到充分利用。局部问题:尽管在复杂的初级保健诊所中使用CGM的患者人数不断增加,但诊所缺乏结构化的工作流程,无法将CGM报告手动上传到电子健康记录。因此,初级保健提供者在常规就诊时用于临床决策的CGM数据不一致。方法:采用计划-实施-研究-行动方法,对注册护士(RNs)、执业护士(lpn)、医学博士(md)、家庭执业护士(FNPs)和临床药师(PharmDs)的工作流程进行检查和改进,以支持项目目标。干预措施:每天确定积极使用CGM的患者。指定的诊所护士(n = 3; 1名注册护士和2名注册护士)上传CGM日志作为访问的预表,然后供提供者(n = 3; 1名注册医生和2名注册护士)在临床就诊时使用。当护士不在时,MD、FNPs或PharmD (n = 1)完成工作流程。结果:在项目评估期间,45例活动性CGM患者中有43例(96%)的动态血糖谱被上传至预表。在这些病例中,有38例(88%)的医生讨论了CGM, 100%正确地使用了CGM。目前的程序术语代码95251在35次(92%)适用的访问中被计费。结论:跨专业团队合作实施临床工作流程改进,支持使用CGM的成人糖尿病治疗指南驱动的交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信