Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss and the significance of occupational noise exposure limit among Chinese industrial workers.

IF 2.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Hengjiang Liu, Meibian Zhang, Xin Sun, Weijiang Hu, Shixing Bai, Hua Zou, Dandan Zhang, Beibei Lu, Yu Tian, Jingsong Li, Wei Qiu
{"title":"Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss and the significance of occupational noise exposure limit among Chinese industrial workers.","authors":"Hengjiang Liu, Meibian Zhang, Xin Sun, Weijiang Hu, Shixing Bai, Hua Zou, Dandan Zhang, Beibei Lu, Yu Tian, Jingsong Li, Wei Qiu","doi":"10.1121/10.0038801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its association with noise kurtosis (β) among 3421 Chinese male industrial workers exposed to complex noise. The objectives were to: (1) quantify the excess risk of NIHL, (2) examine how kurtosis influences this risk, and (3) recommend occupational exposure limits (OELs) for complex noise. Hearing loss was defined using two metrics: pure-tone averages (PTAs) PTA1234-AI (articulation-index-weighted average at 1-4 kHz) and PTA346 (unweighted average at 3-6 kHz). Logistic regression modeled hearing loss probability based on age, exposure level, and exposure duration. To assess kurtosis-related effects, workers were stratified into three kurtosis-based subgroups. Results showed that complex noise exposures yielded significantly higher excess risk than steady-state noise, and excess risk increased with higher kurtosis. Early noise exposure primarily elevated PTA346-defined hearing loss, with PTA1234-AI-defined hearing loss becoming more prominent as cumulative exposure increased. Derivative analysis of excess risk curves suggests lowering the standard OEL of 85 dBA to 80 dBA for PTA1234-AI and 77 dBA for PTA346. For high-kurtosis exposures (β ≥ 70 for PTA1234-AI; β ≥ 25 for PTA346), an additional 2 dBA reduction is recommended. These findings support more protective OELs for industrial workers exposed to non-steady-state, high-kurtosis noise environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"158 2","pages":"1355-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its association with noise kurtosis (β) among 3421 Chinese male industrial workers exposed to complex noise. The objectives were to: (1) quantify the excess risk of NIHL, (2) examine how kurtosis influences this risk, and (3) recommend occupational exposure limits (OELs) for complex noise. Hearing loss was defined using two metrics: pure-tone averages (PTAs) PTA1234-AI (articulation-index-weighted average at 1-4 kHz) and PTA346 (unweighted average at 3-6 kHz). Logistic regression modeled hearing loss probability based on age, exposure level, and exposure duration. To assess kurtosis-related effects, workers were stratified into three kurtosis-based subgroups. Results showed that complex noise exposures yielded significantly higher excess risk than steady-state noise, and excess risk increased with higher kurtosis. Early noise exposure primarily elevated PTA346-defined hearing loss, with PTA1234-AI-defined hearing loss becoming more prominent as cumulative exposure increased. Derivative analysis of excess risk curves suggests lowering the standard OEL of 85 dBA to 80 dBA for PTA1234-AI and 77 dBA for PTA346. For high-kurtosis exposures (β ≥ 70 for PTA1234-AI; β ≥ 25 for PTA346), an additional 2 dBA reduction is recommended. These findings support more protective OELs for industrial workers exposed to non-steady-state, high-kurtosis noise environments.

中国工业工人噪声性听力损失风险评价及职业性噪声暴露限值的意义
本研究评估了3421名中国男性工业工人噪声诱发性听力损失(NIHL)的过度风险及其与噪声峰度(β)的关系。目标是:(1)量化NIHL的过量风险,(2)检查峰度如何影响这种风险,(3)建议复杂噪声的职业暴露限值(OELs)。听力损失的定义采用两个指标:纯音平均值(pta) PTA1234-AI (1-4 kHz发音指数加权平均值)和PTA346 (3-6 kHz非加权平均值)。Logistic回归基于年龄、暴露水平和暴露时间建立了听力损失概率模型。为了评估与峰度相关的影响,工人被分为三个基于峰度的亚组。结果表明,复杂噪声暴露产生的超额风险显著高于稳态噪声,并且超额风险随峰度的增加而增加。早期噪音暴露主要增加了pta346定义的听力损失,随着累积暴露的增加,pta1234 - ai定义的听力损失变得更加突出。过量风险曲线的导数分析表明,PTA1234-AI的标准OEL从85 dBA降至80 dBA, PTA346的标准OEL为77 dBA。对于高峰度暴露(PTA1234-AI的β≥70;PTA346的β≥25),建议额外降低2 dBA。这些研究结果支持工业工人暴露于非稳态、高峰度噪声环境的更保护性的oel。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信