{"title":"Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss and the significance of occupational noise exposure limit among Chinese industrial workers.","authors":"Hengjiang Liu, Meibian Zhang, Xin Sun, Weijiang Hu, Shixing Bai, Hua Zou, Dandan Zhang, Beibei Lu, Yu Tian, Jingsong Li, Wei Qiu","doi":"10.1121/10.0038801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its association with noise kurtosis (β) among 3421 Chinese male industrial workers exposed to complex noise. The objectives were to: (1) quantify the excess risk of NIHL, (2) examine how kurtosis influences this risk, and (3) recommend occupational exposure limits (OELs) for complex noise. Hearing loss was defined using two metrics: pure-tone averages (PTAs) PTA1234-AI (articulation-index-weighted average at 1-4 kHz) and PTA346 (unweighted average at 3-6 kHz). Logistic regression modeled hearing loss probability based on age, exposure level, and exposure duration. To assess kurtosis-related effects, workers were stratified into three kurtosis-based subgroups. Results showed that complex noise exposures yielded significantly higher excess risk than steady-state noise, and excess risk increased with higher kurtosis. Early noise exposure primarily elevated PTA346-defined hearing loss, with PTA1234-AI-defined hearing loss becoming more prominent as cumulative exposure increased. Derivative analysis of excess risk curves suggests lowering the standard OEL of 85 dBA to 80 dBA for PTA1234-AI and 77 dBA for PTA346. For high-kurtosis exposures (β ≥ 70 for PTA1234-AI; β ≥ 25 for PTA346), an additional 2 dBA reduction is recommended. These findings support more protective OELs for industrial workers exposed to non-steady-state, high-kurtosis noise environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"158 2","pages":"1355-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038801","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its association with noise kurtosis (β) among 3421 Chinese male industrial workers exposed to complex noise. The objectives were to: (1) quantify the excess risk of NIHL, (2) examine how kurtosis influences this risk, and (3) recommend occupational exposure limits (OELs) for complex noise. Hearing loss was defined using two metrics: pure-tone averages (PTAs) PTA1234-AI (articulation-index-weighted average at 1-4 kHz) and PTA346 (unweighted average at 3-6 kHz). Logistic regression modeled hearing loss probability based on age, exposure level, and exposure duration. To assess kurtosis-related effects, workers were stratified into three kurtosis-based subgroups. Results showed that complex noise exposures yielded significantly higher excess risk than steady-state noise, and excess risk increased with higher kurtosis. Early noise exposure primarily elevated PTA346-defined hearing loss, with PTA1234-AI-defined hearing loss becoming more prominent as cumulative exposure increased. Derivative analysis of excess risk curves suggests lowering the standard OEL of 85 dBA to 80 dBA for PTA1234-AI and 77 dBA for PTA346. For high-kurtosis exposures (β ≥ 70 for PTA1234-AI; β ≥ 25 for PTA346), an additional 2 dBA reduction is recommended. These findings support more protective OELs for industrial workers exposed to non-steady-state, high-kurtosis noise environments.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.