Ecological Validity of Clinic-Based Actigraphy for Assessing Hyperactivity in Clinically Evaluated Children with and without ADHD.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Michael J Kofler, Elia F Soto, Mark D Rapport, Samuel Whitehead
{"title":"Ecological Validity of Clinic-Based Actigraphy for Assessing Hyperactivity in Clinically Evaluated Children with and without ADHD.","authors":"Michael J Kofler, Elia F Soto, Mark D Rapport, Samuel Whitehead","doi":"10.1007/s10862-025-10218-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Though often conflated with face validity, ecological validity refers to the degree that a test or measure predicts real-world behavior/functioning. The current study leveraged two independent samples to provide a critical evaluation of the extent to which clinic-based actigraphy demonstrates ecological validity evidence relative to parent- and teacher-reported hyperactivity ratings. Further, across both samples we evaluated the extent to which the ecological validity evidence for these mechanical measures of hyperactivity varies as a function of the task children are completing while their movement is assessed objectively (low vs. high cognitive demands). Across two independent samples comprising clinically-evaluated children with and without ADHD (<i>Ns</i>=88, 184; <i>M</i> <sub><i>ages</i></sub> =9.2, 10.4; 6%, 33% girls; 68%, 70% White Non-Hispanic), latent path models indicated that clinic-based actigraphy during visuospatial working memory testing (high cognitive demands) demonstrated significant associations with both parent- and teacher-rated hyperactivity that were indistinguishable (<i>p</i>>.05) from parent and teacher ratings's associations with each other in both sample 1 (<i>r</i>=.57) and sample 2 (<i>r</i>=.35; all <i>p</i><.001). Actigraphy during baseline (low cognitive demand) conditions also uniquely predicted hyperactivity at home and school in both samples (all <i>p</i><.001), albeit with a less consistent yet robust pattern relative to parent/teacher associations. In both samples, actigraphy showed strong test-retest reliability over 2-4 weeks across clinic-based tasks with high cognitive demands (<i>r</i>=.61-.93) and high concurrent validity across tasks with high vs. low cognitive demands (<i>r</i>=.35-.61; all <i>p</i><.007). This pattern supports the ecological validity of clinic-based actigraphy during working memory testing, which predicts real-world behavior at home and school just as well as parent perceptions of hyperactivity at home predict teacher perceptions of hyperactivity at school (and vice versa).</p>","PeriodicalId":16910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-025-10218-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though often conflated with face validity, ecological validity refers to the degree that a test or measure predicts real-world behavior/functioning. The current study leveraged two independent samples to provide a critical evaluation of the extent to which clinic-based actigraphy demonstrates ecological validity evidence relative to parent- and teacher-reported hyperactivity ratings. Further, across both samples we evaluated the extent to which the ecological validity evidence for these mechanical measures of hyperactivity varies as a function of the task children are completing while their movement is assessed objectively (low vs. high cognitive demands). Across two independent samples comprising clinically-evaluated children with and without ADHD (Ns=88, 184; M ages =9.2, 10.4; 6%, 33% girls; 68%, 70% White Non-Hispanic), latent path models indicated that clinic-based actigraphy during visuospatial working memory testing (high cognitive demands) demonstrated significant associations with both parent- and teacher-rated hyperactivity that were indistinguishable (p>.05) from parent and teacher ratings's associations with each other in both sample 1 (r=.57) and sample 2 (r=.35; all p<.001). Actigraphy during baseline (low cognitive demand) conditions also uniquely predicted hyperactivity at home and school in both samples (all p<.001), albeit with a less consistent yet robust pattern relative to parent/teacher associations. In both samples, actigraphy showed strong test-retest reliability over 2-4 weeks across clinic-based tasks with high cognitive demands (r=.61-.93) and high concurrent validity across tasks with high vs. low cognitive demands (r=.35-.61; all p<.007). This pattern supports the ecological validity of clinic-based actigraphy during working memory testing, which predicts real-world behavior at home and school just as well as parent perceptions of hyperactivity at home predict teacher perceptions of hyperactivity at school (and vice versa).

临床活动描记术评估有或无ADHD儿童多动症的生态效度。
虽然经常与面部效度混为一谈,但生态效度指的是测试或测量预测现实世界行为/功能的程度。目前的研究利用了两个独立的样本,对临床活动记录仪在多大程度上证明了与家长和老师报告的多动评分相关的生态有效性证据进行了批判性评估。此外,在这两个样本中,我们评估了这些过度活跃的机械测量的生态有效性证据在多大程度上随儿童完成任务的功能而变化,而他们的运动是客观评估的(低与高认知需求)。在两个独立的样本中,包括临床评估的患有和不患有ADHD的儿童(n =88, 184; M年龄=9.2,10.4;6%,33%;68%, 70%白人,非西班牙裔),潜在路径模型表明,在视觉空间工作记忆测试(高认知要求)中,基于临床的活动记录显示出与父母和老师评价的多动的显著关联(p>.05),与父母和老师评价在样本1 (r= 0.57)和样本2 (r= 0.35;所有ppr= 0.61 - 0.93)中彼此的关联难以区分(p>.05),并且在高认知要求和低认知要求的任务中具有高并发效度(r= 0.35 - 0.61;所有p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment publishes articles reporting research investigations and clinical case summaries which enhance understanding of psychopathology and mental disorders applicable to all ages, deviant or abnormal behaviors, including those related to medical conditions and trauma, and constructs descriptive of personality. The Journal fosters scientific inquiry into assessment, description, and classification of normal and abnormal behaviors, psychobiological factors predisposing, precipitating, and maintaining psychopathology, and theories of psychopathology and behavior change. Studies of normal personality constructs and positive person attributes, person and environment factors influencing behavioral outcomes, and interactive models of cognitive, emotional, and behavior resource factors as impacting normal and abnormal behaviors are encouraged. Within Journal purview are articles focusing on therapeutic interventions, technical notes on instrumentation and assessment methodology, and reviews of recently-published books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信