The Relationship Between ICD Knowledge and Goals of Care in a Diverse Patient Population

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sarah Godfrey MD, MPH , Kelley Newcomer MD , Nicholas Lorusso PhD , Christopher Viamontes MD , Brenden Garrett MD , Nakul Patel BS , Christine Chen MD , Kristin S. Alvarez PharmD , Nainesh Shah MD , Melanie S. Sulistio MD
{"title":"The Relationship Between ICD Knowledge and Goals of Care in a Diverse Patient Population","authors":"Sarah Godfrey MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Kelley Newcomer MD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Lorusso PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher Viamontes MD ,&nbsp;Brenden Garrett MD ,&nbsp;Nakul Patel BS ,&nbsp;Christine Chen MD ,&nbsp;Kristin S. Alvarez PharmD ,&nbsp;Nainesh Shah MD ,&nbsp;Melanie S. Sulistio MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can be lifesaving, but ICD shocks are also associated with worse quality of life and emotional distress for patients and their families, particularly near the end of life. Shared decision-making regarding deactivation is critical, yet it can be challenging due to limited patient understanding of their devices. Existing ICD educational materials often lack cultural and linguistic inclusivity, contributing to disparities in end-of-life care for Black and Hispanic patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with active ICDs at a large, urban safety net hospital completed a pre-survey, then watched a 7- to 9-minute video on the functions and deactivation of ICDs. Afterward, patients were surveyed about their ICD knowledge, preferences regarding four hypothetical end-of-life scenarios, and personal experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 50 participants, 58% were non-Hispanic Black, 24% non-Hispanic White, and 18% Hispanic White. ICD knowledge improved significantly from 47.4% to 80.8% (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Knowledge improvement was similar for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic White cohorts but lower for Hispanic White patients (<em>P</em> = 0.0001). Preferences for ICD deactivation changed for 72% of participants with hypothetical scenarios involving “being a caregiving burden” (<em>P</em> = 0.009) and “having no hope of recovery” (<em>P</em> = 0.001) showing the greatest increases in ICD deactivation preference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Educational decision aids specific to a patient population can reduce disparities in ICD knowledge and promote informed decision-making, particularly in underserved populations. Improving patients’ understanding of their devices increased certainty and preference for ICD deactivation in end-of-life scenarios. Despite promising results, persistently lower knowledge in Hispanic White patients signals the need for tailored educational strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"70 5","pages":"Pages 532-540.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425007973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can be lifesaving, but ICD shocks are also associated with worse quality of life and emotional distress for patients and their families, particularly near the end of life. Shared decision-making regarding deactivation is critical, yet it can be challenging due to limited patient understanding of their devices. Existing ICD educational materials often lack cultural and linguistic inclusivity, contributing to disparities in end-of-life care for Black and Hispanic patients.

Methods

Patients with active ICDs at a large, urban safety net hospital completed a pre-survey, then watched a 7- to 9-minute video on the functions and deactivation of ICDs. Afterward, patients were surveyed about their ICD knowledge, preferences regarding four hypothetical end-of-life scenarios, and personal experiences.

Results

Of 50 participants, 58% were non-Hispanic Black, 24% non-Hispanic White, and 18% Hispanic White. ICD knowledge improved significantly from 47.4% to 80.8% (P < 0.001). Knowledge improvement was similar for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic White cohorts but lower for Hispanic White patients (P = 0.0001). Preferences for ICD deactivation changed for 72% of participants with hypothetical scenarios involving “being a caregiving burden” (P = 0.009) and “having no hope of recovery” (P = 0.001) showing the greatest increases in ICD deactivation preference.

Conclusions

Educational decision aids specific to a patient population can reduce disparities in ICD knowledge and promote informed decision-making, particularly in underserved populations. Improving patients’ understanding of their devices increased certainty and preference for ICD deactivation in end-of-life scenarios. Despite promising results, persistently lower knowledge in Hispanic White patients signals the need for tailored educational strategies.
不同患者群体中ICD知识与护理目标的关系
背景:植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)可以挽救生命,但ICD冲击也与患者及其家属的生活质量下降和情绪困扰有关,特别是在生命即将结束时。关于停用的共同决策至关重要,但由于患者对其设备的了解有限,这可能具有挑战性。现有的ICD教育材料往往缺乏文化和语言的包容性,导致黑人和西班牙裔患者在临终关怀方面存在差异。方法:在一家大型城市安全网医院,患有活跃icd的患者完成了一份预调查,然后观看了一段7- 9分钟的关于icd功能和失活的视频。之后,对患者的ICD知识、对四种假设的临终场景的偏好以及个人经历进行了调查。结果:50名参与者中,58%为非西班牙裔黑人,24%为非西班牙裔白人,18%为西班牙裔白人。ICD知识从47.4%显著提高到80.8%(结论:针对患者群体的教育决策辅助可以减少ICD知识的差异,促进知情决策,特别是在服务不足的人群中。)提高患者对其装置的了解增加了临终情景中ICD停用的确定性和偏好。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但西班牙裔白人患者的知识持续下降表明需要量身定制的教育策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信