The obturator foramen "safe zone" for anterior pelvis internal fixation by trans-obturator cerclage.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Raymond Bui, Soroush Shabani, Andrew Duong, Avinash Iyer, Phillip Grisdela, Joseph T Patterson
{"title":"The obturator foramen \"safe zone\" for anterior pelvis internal fixation by trans-obturator cerclage.","authors":"Raymond Bui, Soroush Shabani, Andrew Duong, Avinash Iyer, Phillip Grisdela, Joseph T Patterson","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the morphology of an avascular \"safe zone\" within the obturator foramen to assess the risk of neurovascular injury with trans-obturator foramen cerclage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center and tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adults ≥18 years without prior pelvic pathology and with pelvic computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrating complete visualization of the obturator arteries.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The minimal distance from the medial cranial border of the obturator foramen to the obturator artery (DOA) and the obturator foramen area (OFA) bounded by the obturator artery and pubis were measured on CTA in the plane of the obturator foramen. Associations of OFA and DOA with demographic and anthropometric variables were analyzed by multivariable linear regression. The \"safe zone\" for passage of trans-obturator cerclage instrumentation was determined by the 5.0mm outer diameter of a commercially available cable passer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included sixty adults, 35 men (58.3%), with a mean age of 56.2±16.4 years. The mean DOA (left 6.8±1.9mm, right 6.9±1.6mm, p=0.724) and OFA (left 195.1±63.3mm2, right 190.3±55.4mm2, p=0.657) did not vary by laterality. DOA was >3.2mm for all patients but <5.0mm in 23.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis indicated that DOA was associated with patient height (β=0.04, p=0.019) but not sex (β=0.01, p=0.987) or weight (β=0.01, p=0.253).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A \"safe zone\" defined by the obturator artery and cranial and medial obturator foramina exists for internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring by trans-obturator foramen cerclage. While a cerclage device ≤3.2mm in diameter appears safe, passage of a cerclage wire through the cranial and medial obturator foramina for internal fixation anterior pelvic ring disruption with typical instrumentation may injure the obturator neurovascular bundle without additional surgical dissection.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the morphology of an avascular "safe zone" within the obturator foramen to assess the risk of neurovascular injury with trans-obturator foramen cerclage.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Level 1 trauma center and tertiary academic center.

Patient selection criteria: Adults ≥18 years without prior pelvic pathology and with pelvic computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrating complete visualization of the obturator arteries.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The minimal distance from the medial cranial border of the obturator foramen to the obturator artery (DOA) and the obturator foramen area (OFA) bounded by the obturator artery and pubis were measured on CTA in the plane of the obturator foramen. Associations of OFA and DOA with demographic and anthropometric variables were analyzed by multivariable linear regression. The "safe zone" for passage of trans-obturator cerclage instrumentation was determined by the 5.0mm outer diameter of a commercially available cable passer.

Results: The sample included sixty adults, 35 men (58.3%), with a mean age of 56.2±16.4 years. The mean DOA (left 6.8±1.9mm, right 6.9±1.6mm, p=0.724) and OFA (left 195.1±63.3mm2, right 190.3±55.4mm2, p=0.657) did not vary by laterality. DOA was >3.2mm for all patients but <5.0mm in 23.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis indicated that DOA was associated with patient height (β=0.04, p=0.019) but not sex (β=0.01, p=0.987) or weight (β=0.01, p=0.253).

Conclusions: A "safe zone" defined by the obturator artery and cranial and medial obturator foramina exists for internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring by trans-obturator foramen cerclage. While a cerclage device ≤3.2mm in diameter appears safe, passage of a cerclage wire through the cranial and medial obturator foramina for internal fixation anterior pelvic ring disruption with typical instrumentation may injure the obturator neurovascular bundle without additional surgical dissection.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III.

经闭孔环扎术骨盆前路内固定的闭孔“安全区”。
目的:量化闭孔内无血管“安全区”的形态,以评估经闭孔环扎术对神经血管损伤的风险。设计:回顾性图表回顾。单位:一级创伤中心和三级学术中心。患者选择标准:成人≥18岁,既往无盆腔病变,且盆腔计算机断层血管造影(CTA)显示闭孔动脉完全可见。结果测量和比较:在闭孔平面上用CTA测量闭孔内侧颅缘到闭孔动脉(DOA)和闭孔动脉与耻骨交界的闭孔区(OFA)的最小距离。采用多变量线性回归分析OFA和DOA与人口统计学和人体测量学变量的关系。经闭孔环扣仪器通过的“安全区域”由市售电缆穿过器的5.0mm外径确定。结果:成人60例,男性35例(58.3%),平均年龄56.2±16.4岁。平均DOA(左侧6.8±1.9mm,右侧6.9±1.6mm, p=0.724)和OFA(左侧195.1±63.3mm2,右侧190.3±55.4mm2, p=0.657)与侧位无关。结论:经闭孔环切术内固定骨盆前环存在一个由闭孔动脉、颅孔和内侧闭孔确定的“安全区”。虽然直径≤3.2mm的环扎装置似乎是安全的,但在典型内固定骨盆前环断裂的情况下,通过环扎钢丝穿过颅和内侧闭孔进行内固定可能会损伤闭孔神经血管束,而无需额外的手术剥离。证据等级:预后III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信