Low Dose Naltrexone for Refractory Cancer Pain: Case Series of Initial Safety and Effectiveness.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aila Malik, Alice Ye, Matthew Chung
{"title":"Low Dose Naltrexone for Refractory Cancer Pain: Case Series of Initial Safety and Effectiveness.","authors":"Aila Malik, Alice Ye, Matthew Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Low dose naltrexone (LDN) has been utilized off-label for chronic non-cancer pain; its benefits in treating cancer-related pain remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We describe the safety and effectiveness of LDN therapy from initiation to the first two follow-up visits in treating refractory cancer-pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical charts of cancer patients seen in the Pain Management Center who were prescribed LDN between 2022 and 2023 were reviewed. They were classified as \"responders\" if they attributed improvement in their primary pain complaints to LDN therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 20 cancer patients who were prescribed LDN, the most common cancer diagnosis was breast cancer (45%). There were 10 patients with cancer burden-related pain and 10 patients with therapy-related pain. Positive response rates of 80% (16/20), and 76.9% (10/13) were recorded at the first and second follow-up visits, respectively which occurred at a mean (SD) of 65.9 (53.3), and 104.8 (60.4) days following LDN initiation, respectively. The most common maximum titration dose of naltrexone was 3.0 mg daily (n = 9) (range 1.5-4.5 mg daily). Therapy-related neuropathy accounted for seven cases with a 71% positive response rate in this subset at the first follow-up. Minor adverse events were noted in two patients (insomnia, GI upset) at the first follow-up; these did not require discontinuation of LDN. The discontinuation rate by the second follow-up was 15% (3/20) (two with inadequate pain relief, one with diarrhea).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early follow-up indicates potential benefits for patients with refractory cancer pain with LDN being well-tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Low dose naltrexone (LDN) has been utilized off-label for chronic non-cancer pain; its benefits in treating cancer-related pain remain unclear.

Objectives: We describe the safety and effectiveness of LDN therapy from initiation to the first two follow-up visits in treating refractory cancer-pain.

Methods: Medical charts of cancer patients seen in the Pain Management Center who were prescribed LDN between 2022 and 2023 were reviewed. They were classified as "responders" if they attributed improvement in their primary pain complaints to LDN therapy.

Results: Among the 20 cancer patients who were prescribed LDN, the most common cancer diagnosis was breast cancer (45%). There were 10 patients with cancer burden-related pain and 10 patients with therapy-related pain. Positive response rates of 80% (16/20), and 76.9% (10/13) were recorded at the first and second follow-up visits, respectively which occurred at a mean (SD) of 65.9 (53.3), and 104.8 (60.4) days following LDN initiation, respectively. The most common maximum titration dose of naltrexone was 3.0 mg daily (n = 9) (range 1.5-4.5 mg daily). Therapy-related neuropathy accounted for seven cases with a 71% positive response rate in this subset at the first follow-up. Minor adverse events were noted in two patients (insomnia, GI upset) at the first follow-up; these did not require discontinuation of LDN. The discontinuation rate by the second follow-up was 15% (3/20) (two with inadequate pain relief, one with diarrhea).

Conclusion: Early follow-up indicates potential benefits for patients with refractory cancer pain with LDN being well-tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse events.

低剂量纳曲酮治疗难治性癌痛:初步安全性和有效性的病例系列。
背景:低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)已被适应症外用于慢性非癌性疼痛;它在治疗癌症相关疼痛方面的益处尚不清楚。目的:我们描述了从开始到前两次随访LDN治疗难治性癌性疼痛的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2022 - 2023年在疼痛管理中心接受LDN治疗的癌症患者病历。如果他们将其主要疼痛主诉的改善归因于LDN治疗,则他们被归类为“应答者”。结果:在20例使用LDN的癌症患者中,最常见的癌症诊断是乳腺癌(45%)。10例患者有癌症负担相关疼痛,10例患者有治疗相关疼痛。第一次和第二次随访的阳性缓解率分别为80%(16/20)和76.9%(10/13),分别发生在LDN开始后的平均(SD)为65.9(53.3)天和104.8(60.4)天。纳曲酮最常见的最大滴定剂量为每日3.0 mg (n=9)(范围为每日1.5-4.5 mg)。治疗相关神经病变占7例,在第一次随访时,该亚群的阳性反应率为71%。第一次随访时,2例患者出现轻微不良事件(失眠、胃肠道不适);这些不需要停止LDN。第二次随访时停药率为15%(3/20)(2例疼痛缓解不足,1例腹泻)。结论:早期随访表明,LDN难治性癌性疼痛患者耐受性良好,不良事件发生率低,具有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信