Comparison of Crotalidae Immune F(ab')2 (Equine) and Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) at Establishing Control of Initial Envenomation Symptoms in Louisiana Agkistrodon Envenomations.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Journal of Medical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s13181-025-01093-6
Taylor Sanders, Christine Murphy, Greggory Davis, Christina Aspinwall, Lauren Theriot, Christopher McVicker, Thomas Arnold
{"title":"Comparison of Crotalidae Immune F(ab')2 (Equine) and Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) at Establishing Control of Initial Envenomation Symptoms in Louisiana Agkistrodon Envenomations.","authors":"Taylor Sanders, Christine Murphy, Greggory Davis, Christina Aspinwall, Lauren Theriot, Christopher McVicker, Thomas Arnold","doi":"10.1007/s13181-025-01093-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Copperheads and cottonmouths are responsible for most snake envenomations in Louisiana. While the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved both Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (FabAV) and Crotalidae immune F(ab')<sub>2</sub> (Fab2AV) for Agkistrodon envenomations, data is limited comparing their efficacies for this indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study comparing FabAV to Fab2AV in the treatment of suspected Agkistrodon envenomations in Louisiana between April 2017 and October 2024. Cases identifying rattlesnakes were excluded. The primary outcome was the need for additional antivenom doses to achieve control after the initial antivenom dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-eight patients received FabAV or Fab2AV, with 100 cases meeting inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven patients received FabAV and 43 received Fab2AV. The snake was identified as copperhead in 48 cases, cottonmouth in 23, and unidentified in 29. In the FabAV cohort, the initial number of vials ranged from four to 12 with a median dose of four vials. Nine FabAV cases (16%) required additional vials for initial control after the first dose. In the Fab2AV cohort, all patients received 10 vials initially, with 24 cases (56%) requiring additional vials for initial control after the first dose. There was a significant difference in the percentage of patients requiring additional control vials between FabAV and Fab2AV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort of suspected Agkistrodon envenomations, control with initial recommended dosing was more often achieved with FabAV compared to Fab2AV (84% vs. 44%). The results suggest potential benefit to hospitals stocking FabAV in Louisiana and possibly other Agkistrodon-predominant regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"377-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01093-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Copperheads and cottonmouths are responsible for most snake envenomations in Louisiana. While the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved both Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (FabAV) and Crotalidae immune F(ab')2 (Fab2AV) for Agkistrodon envenomations, data is limited comparing their efficacies for this indication.

Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing FabAV to Fab2AV in the treatment of suspected Agkistrodon envenomations in Louisiana between April 2017 and October 2024. Cases identifying rattlesnakes were excluded. The primary outcome was the need for additional antivenom doses to achieve control after the initial antivenom dose.

Results: One hundred fifty-eight patients received FabAV or Fab2AV, with 100 cases meeting inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven patients received FabAV and 43 received Fab2AV. The snake was identified as copperhead in 48 cases, cottonmouth in 23, and unidentified in 29. In the FabAV cohort, the initial number of vials ranged from four to 12 with a median dose of four vials. Nine FabAV cases (16%) required additional vials for initial control after the first dose. In the Fab2AV cohort, all patients received 10 vials initially, with 24 cases (56%) requiring additional vials for initial control after the first dose. There was a significant difference in the percentage of patients requiring additional control vials between FabAV and Fab2AV.

Conclusion: In this cohort of suspected Agkistrodon envenomations, control with initial recommended dosing was more often achieved with FabAV compared to Fab2AV (84% vs. 44%). The results suggest potential benefit to hospitals stocking FabAV in Louisiana and possibly other Agkistrodon-predominant regions.

Crotalidae免疫F(ab’)2(马)与Crotalidae多价免疫Fab(羊)在路易斯安那蝮蛇中毒初期症状控制中的比较
简介:铜头蛇和水腹蛇是路易斯安那州大多数毒蛇中毒的罪魁祸首。虽然美国食品和药物管理局已经批准了Crotalidae多价免疫Fab (FabAV)和Crotalidae免疫F(ab')2 (Fab2AV)用于蝮蛇毒素治疗,但比较它们对该适应症的疗效的数据有限。方法:回顾性比较2017年4月至2024年10月期间,FabAV与Fab2AV在路易斯安那州治疗疑似蝮蛇中毒的疗效。排除了识别响尾蛇的病例。主要结果是在初始抗蛇毒血清剂量后需要额外的抗蛇毒血清剂量以达到控制。结果:158例患者接受FabAV或Fab2AV治疗,其中100例符合纳入标准。57例患者接受FabAV, 43例接受Fab2AV。其中48例为铜头蛇,23例为水腹蛇,29例为不明蛇。在FabAV队列中,初始剂量从4瓶到12瓶不等,中位剂量为4瓶。9例FabAV病例(16%)在首次注射后需要额外的小瓶进行初始对照。在Fab2AV队列中,所有患者最初接受10小瓶,其中24例(56%)在首次给药后需要额外的小瓶作为初始对照。在FabAV和Fab2AV之间,需要额外对照瓶的患者百分比有显著差异。结论:在这个疑似蝮蛇中毒的队列中,与Fab2AV相比,FabAV在初始推荐剂量下更容易达到控制(84%对44%)。结果表明,在路易斯安那州和其他以蝮蛇为主的地区,医院储存FabAV可能会有潜在的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信