Global Consensus-Based Essential and Expanded Packages for Palliative Care and Pain Relief for Adults and Children: A Delphi Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tania Pastrana, Liliana De Lima, Veronica Dussel, Xiaoxiao Jiang Kwete, Julia Downing, Marie Fallon, Liz Grant, Afsan Bhadelia, Lukas Radbruch
{"title":"Global Consensus-Based Essential and Expanded Packages for Palliative Care and Pain Relief for Adults and Children: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Tania Pastrana, Liliana De Lima, Veronica Dussel, Xiaoxiao Jiang Kwete, Julia Downing, Marie Fallon, Liz Grant, Afsan Bhadelia, Lukas Radbruch","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, the Lancet Commission on Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief introduced the concept of serious health-related suffering (SHS) to quantify the need for palliative care and proposed an essential package of palliative care and pain relief (PCPR) to address it. However, this package did not account for complex and specialized needs, and its global implementation has been limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a multistage, modified Delphi study to update and expand the initial Essential Package for children and adults METHODS: Two international panels -adult and pediatric- representing diverse geographical regions and income levels participated in two Delphi rounds. External validation was conducted by global experts in palliative care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retention rates for the Delphi rounds were 79.5% for adults and 64.0% for children. Consensus was achieved on the updated Essential Packages for both adults and children, with minor modifications. Expanded Packages were developed, including additional medications, equipment, and human resources to address broader needs. The study also revealed persistent inequities in medicine availability, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and limited awareness of the Lancet Commission's Essential Package among health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These globally validated Essential and Expanded Packages for adults and children offer a practical adaptable framework to guide national health strategies, strengthen palliative care services, and reduce SHS. Their adoption can meaningfully contribute to achieving Universal Health Coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2018, the Lancet Commission on Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief introduced the concept of serious health-related suffering (SHS) to quantify the need for palliative care and proposed an essential package of palliative care and pain relief (PCPR) to address it. However, this package did not account for complex and specialized needs, and its global implementation has been limited.

Objectives: We conducted a multistage, modified Delphi study to update and expand the initial Essential Package for children and adults METHODS: Two international panels -adult and pediatric- representing diverse geographical regions and income levels participated in two Delphi rounds. External validation was conducted by global experts in palliative care.

Results: Retention rates for the Delphi rounds were 79.5% for adults and 64.0% for children. Consensus was achieved on the updated Essential Packages for both adults and children, with minor modifications. Expanded Packages were developed, including additional medications, equipment, and human resources to address broader needs. The study also revealed persistent inequities in medicine availability, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and limited awareness of the Lancet Commission's Essential Package among health professionals.

Conclusion: These globally validated Essential and Expanded Packages for adults and children offer a practical adaptable framework to guide national health strategies, strengthen palliative care services, and reduce SHS. Their adoption can meaningfully contribute to achieving Universal Health Coverage.

全球共识为基础的基本和扩展包姑息治疗和疼痛缓解成人和儿童:德尔菲研究。
背景:2018年,《柳叶刀》全球获得姑息治疗和缓解疼痛委员会引入了严重健康相关痛苦(SHS)的概念,以量化对姑息治疗的需求,并提出了一套基本的姑息治疗和缓解疼痛方案(PCPR)来解决这一问题。但是,这一一揽子计划没有考虑到复杂和专门的需要,其在全球的执行受到限制。目的:我们进行了一项多阶段、改进的德尔菲研究,以更新和扩展针对儿童和成人的初始基本包。方法:代表不同地理区域和收入水平的两个国际小组(成人和儿科)参加了两轮德尔菲研究。外部验证由全球姑息治疗专家进行。结果:成人的德尔菲回合应答率为79.5%,儿童为64.0%。就更新后的成人和儿童基本套餐达成了共识,并进行了轻微修改。开发了扩展包,包括额外的药物、设备和人力资源,以满足更广泛的需求。该研究还揭示了药物供应方面持续存在的不公平现象,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,以及卫生专业人员对《柳叶刀》委员会基本一揽子计划的认识有限。结论:这些全球认可的成人和儿童基本包和扩展包为指导国家卫生战略、加强姑息治疗服务和减少SHS提供了一个实用的适应性框架。它们的采用可为实现全民健康覆盖作出有意义的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信