Waste Audit of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Pilot Study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Simone A Sasse, Amy C Bleasdale, Justin Zaslavsky, Julia Niemeier, Hannah Karpel, Kathy Huang, Cassandra L Thiel
{"title":"Waste Audit of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Simone A Sasse, Amy C Bleasdale, Justin Zaslavsky, Julia Niemeier, Hannah Karpel, Kathy Huang, Cassandra L Thiel","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.08.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To quantify and characterize waste generated in robotic gynecologic surgery and assess its environmental impact, with the goal of identifying strategies to reduce waste and improve sustainability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Waste audit and life cycle impact assessment of robotic gynecologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Twenty robotic gynecologic surgery cases, including hysterectomies (n=10), myomectomies (n=6), and tubal, ovarian, or endometriosis surgeries (n=4).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A detailed waste audit of all surgical waste to categorize materials into municipal solid waste (MSW) and regulated medical waste (RMW), allowing for subsequent life cycle impact assessment.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The 20 audited cases produced 367.02 kg of MSW and 9.68 kg of RMW, averaging 18.35 kg (standard deviation, SD, 2.63 kg) of MSW and 0.48 kg (SD 0.52 kg) of RMW per case. The largest contributor by weight was surgical gowns and drapes composed of spunbond-meltblown-spunbond (SMS) polypropylene. An average of 0.59 kg (SD 0.25 kg) of recyclable plastics and 11.85 batteries (SD 4.09) per case were discarded as MSW. No RMW met biohazard criteria. Unused surgical supplies accounted for 1.11 kg (SD 0.56 kg) of waste per case. Cases produced an average of 0.70 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e (SD 0.27) per minute of operative time, with shorter surgeries producing the most emissions per minute. Cotton products contributed up to almost one-third of an impact category despite accounting for 5% of the total waste by weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opportunities to reduce the environmental impact of robotic gynecologic surgeries include reorganizing surgical kits to avoid the unnecessary opening of commonly unused items, increasing reprocessing of single-use devices, properly sorting recyclable plastics and paper products, appropriately using regulated medical waste streams, considering alternative surgical modalities for less complex cases, and exploring reusable or more environmentally-friendly alternatives to cotton and SMS polypropylene products.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.08.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To quantify and characterize waste generated in robotic gynecologic surgery and assess its environmental impact, with the goal of identifying strategies to reduce waste and improve sustainability.

Design: Waste audit and life cycle impact assessment of robotic gynecologic surgery.

Setting: Single academic institution.

Patients: Twenty robotic gynecologic surgery cases, including hysterectomies (n=10), myomectomies (n=6), and tubal, ovarian, or endometriosis surgeries (n=4).

Interventions: A detailed waste audit of all surgical waste to categorize materials into municipal solid waste (MSW) and regulated medical waste (RMW), allowing for subsequent life cycle impact assessment.

Measurements and main results: The 20 audited cases produced 367.02 kg of MSW and 9.68 kg of RMW, averaging 18.35 kg (standard deviation, SD, 2.63 kg) of MSW and 0.48 kg (SD 0.52 kg) of RMW per case. The largest contributor by weight was surgical gowns and drapes composed of spunbond-meltblown-spunbond (SMS) polypropylene. An average of 0.59 kg (SD 0.25 kg) of recyclable plastics and 11.85 batteries (SD 4.09) per case were discarded as MSW. No RMW met biohazard criteria. Unused surgical supplies accounted for 1.11 kg (SD 0.56 kg) of waste per case. Cases produced an average of 0.70 kg CO2e (SD 0.27) per minute of operative time, with shorter surgeries producing the most emissions per minute. Cotton products contributed up to almost one-third of an impact category despite accounting for 5% of the total waste by weight.

Conclusion: Opportunities to reduce the environmental impact of robotic gynecologic surgeries include reorganizing surgical kits to avoid the unnecessary opening of commonly unused items, increasing reprocessing of single-use devices, properly sorting recyclable plastics and paper products, appropriately using regulated medical waste streams, considering alternative surgical modalities for less complex cases, and exploring reusable or more environmentally-friendly alternatives to cotton and SMS polypropylene products.

机器人妇科手术的浪费审计:一项试点研究。
研究目的:量化和表征机器人妇科手术产生的废物,并评估其对环境的影响,以确定减少废物和提高可持续性的策略。设计:机器人妇科手术的废物审计和生命周期影响评估。设置:单一学术机构。患者:20例机器人妇科手术,包括子宫切除术(n=10)、子宫肌瘤切除术(n=6)和输卵管、卵巢或子宫内膜异位症手术(n=4)。干预措施:对所有手术废物进行详细的废物审计,将其分类为城市固体废物(MSW)和受管制的医疗废物(RMW),以便随后进行生命周期影响评估。测量结果及主要结果:经审核的20宗个案产生367.02公斤都市固体废物和9.68公斤RMW,平均每宗个案产生18.35公斤(标准差2.63公斤)都市固体废物和0.48公斤(标准差0.52公斤)RMW。按重量计算,最大的贡献者是由纺粘-熔喷-纺粘(SMS)聚丙烯组成的手术服和窗帘。每箱平均有0.59公斤(标准差0.25公斤)可回收塑料和11.85个电池(标准差4.09)被作为都市固体废物丢弃。没有RMW符合生物危害标准。未使用的手术用品占每例1.11 kg (SD 0.56 kg)的废物。病例每分钟手术时间平均产生0.70 kg二氧化碳当量(SD 0.27),较短的手术每分钟产生的排放量最多。尽管棉制品占总废物重量的5%,但其贡献了近三分之一的影响类别。结论:减少机器人妇科手术对环境影响的机会包括:重新整理手术包,避免不必要地打开通常未使用的物品,增加一次性器械的再处理,对可回收塑料和纸制品进行适当分类,适当使用受管制的医疗废物流,考虑对不太复杂的病例采用替代手术方式,探索可重复使用或更环保的棉和SMS聚丙烯产品替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信