Rehabilitation research in spinal muscular atrophy: a call to action.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Charlotte Lilien, Leslie Nelson, Lisa Edel, Danielle Forrest, Timothy Estilow, Katlyn E McGrattan, Tina Duong, Giorgia Coratti
{"title":"Rehabilitation research in spinal muscular atrophy: a call to action.","authors":"Charlotte Lilien, Leslie Nelson, Lisa Edel, Danielle Forrest, Timothy Estilow, Katlyn E McGrattan, Tina Duong, Giorgia Coratti","doi":"10.1177/22143602251364945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DesignThe landscape of spinal muscular atrophy drastically changed following the introduction of disease-modifying therapies, emphasizing the need for comprehensive rehabilitation strategies to maximize functional outcomes. Our aim is to identify the barriers faced by healthcare professionals in conducting rehabilitation research for spinal muscular atrophy and suggest potential solutions to increase evidence-based care.MethodsWe performed a narrative review of rehabilitation intervention studies with a quality assessment focusing on the research characteristics of each study and an international survey questioning healthcare professionals on their major areas of difficulty in conducting interventional studies.ResultsThe review highlighted a predominantly low to unacceptable quality of the 36 retained studies across four healthcare professional domains responsible for rehabilitation: physiotherapy/physical therapy (18), occupational therapy (4), respiratory therapy (10), and speech and language therapy/speech language pathology (4).The survey was completed by 204 health care providers from 35 countries. Funding was found to be the most significant barrier to rehabilitation research, followed by study design and recruitment challenges.ConclusionOur findings highlight the urgent need for randomized controlled trials and standardized methodologies to develop robust, evidence-based multi-disciplinary rehabilitation strategies that better support individuals with spinal muscular atrophy in achieving optimal functional outcomes in the era of disease-modifying treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","volume":" ","pages":"22143602251364945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuromuscular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22143602251364945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DesignThe landscape of spinal muscular atrophy drastically changed following the introduction of disease-modifying therapies, emphasizing the need for comprehensive rehabilitation strategies to maximize functional outcomes. Our aim is to identify the barriers faced by healthcare professionals in conducting rehabilitation research for spinal muscular atrophy and suggest potential solutions to increase evidence-based care.MethodsWe performed a narrative review of rehabilitation intervention studies with a quality assessment focusing on the research characteristics of each study and an international survey questioning healthcare professionals on their major areas of difficulty in conducting interventional studies.ResultsThe review highlighted a predominantly low to unacceptable quality of the 36 retained studies across four healthcare professional domains responsible for rehabilitation: physiotherapy/physical therapy (18), occupational therapy (4), respiratory therapy (10), and speech and language therapy/speech language pathology (4).The survey was completed by 204 health care providers from 35 countries. Funding was found to be the most significant barrier to rehabilitation research, followed by study design and recruitment challenges.ConclusionOur findings highlight the urgent need for randomized controlled trials and standardized methodologies to develop robust, evidence-based multi-disciplinary rehabilitation strategies that better support individuals with spinal muscular atrophy in achieving optimal functional outcomes in the era of disease-modifying treatments.

脊髓性肌萎缩症的康复研究:行动呼吁。
随着疾病改善疗法的引入,脊髓性肌萎缩的情况发生了巨大变化,强调需要综合康复策略来最大化功能结果。我们的目的是确定医疗保健专业人员在进行脊髓性肌萎缩症康复研究时面临的障碍,并提出增加循证护理的潜在解决方案。方法:我们对康复干预研究进行叙述性回顾,对每项研究的研究特征进行质量评估,并对医疗保健专业人员进行国际调查,询问他们进行干预研究的主要困难领域。结果本综述强调了36项保留研究的主要低到不可接受的质量,涉及四个负责康复的医疗专业领域:物理治疗/物理治疗(18)、职业治疗(4)、呼吸治疗(10)和言语和语言治疗/言语语言病理学(4)。该调查由来自35个国家的204名卫生保健提供者完成。研究发现,资金是康复研究的最大障碍,其次是研究设计和招募方面的挑战。结论:我们的研究结果表明,迫切需要随机对照试验和标准化的方法来制定强有力的、循证的多学科康复策略,以更好地支持脊髓性肌萎缩症患者在疾病改善治疗时代实现最佳功能结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neuromuscular diseases
Journal of neuromuscular diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases aims to facilitate progress in understanding the molecular genetics/correlates, pathogenesis, pharmacology, diagnosis and treatment of acquired and genetic neuromuscular diseases (including muscular dystrophy, myasthenia gravis, spinal muscular atrophy, neuropathies, myopathies, myotonias and myositis). The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, letters-to-the-editor, and will consider research that has negative findings. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research in basic science, translational and clinical research that will improve our fundamental understanding and lead to effective treatments of neuromuscular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信