Practice Variation in Arterial Catheter Placement: A Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Practitioners.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mary S Pilarz, Christopher D Mattson, Cara M Pritchett, Amelia K Rountree, Matthew J Rowland
{"title":"Practice Variation in Arterial Catheter Placement: A Survey of Pediatric Critical Care Practitioners.","authors":"Mary S Pilarz, Christopher D Mattson, Cara M Pritchett, Amelia K Rountree, Matthew J Rowland","doi":"10.1177/08850666251363551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThere is not a consensus in critical care medicine on when arterial catheters are indicated, nor is there evidence that ACs improve patient outcomes. There is wide variability in AC use across PICUs that is independent of illness severity.ObjectiveTo characterize arterial catheter placement practices among pediatric critical care clinicians and identify practice variability in techniques, indications, and attitudes.DesignAnonymous, cross-sectional web-based survey.Measurements and Main ResultsData were collected from 377 pediatric critical care practitioners across 93 institutions. The majority were attending physicians (n = 215, 57.0%) or fellows (n = 141, 37.4%). Ultrasound was always used for arterial catheter placement by 52.0% (196/377) of respondents, with fellows being more likely than attendings to use ultrasound (<i>P</i> = .005). The catheter-over-wire (Seldinger) technique was the most common insertion method (332/377, 88.1%). For site selection, the radial artery was preferred for peripheral placement (97.3%), and the femoral artery for central cannulation (81.1%). There was substantial variability in the reported indications for arterial catheter use, with 68.9% considering single vasoactive support as an indication.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates wide practice variation in arterial catheter placement among pediatric ICU clinicians, despite the existence of some practice guidelines. Future research should focus on addressing gaps in evidence, particularly around ultrasound-guided techniques and securement methods, to optimize practices and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251363551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251363551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere is not a consensus in critical care medicine on when arterial catheters are indicated, nor is there evidence that ACs improve patient outcomes. There is wide variability in AC use across PICUs that is independent of illness severity.ObjectiveTo characterize arterial catheter placement practices among pediatric critical care clinicians and identify practice variability in techniques, indications, and attitudes.DesignAnonymous, cross-sectional web-based survey.Measurements and Main ResultsData were collected from 377 pediatric critical care practitioners across 93 institutions. The majority were attending physicians (n = 215, 57.0%) or fellows (n = 141, 37.4%). Ultrasound was always used for arterial catheter placement by 52.0% (196/377) of respondents, with fellows being more likely than attendings to use ultrasound (P = .005). The catheter-over-wire (Seldinger) technique was the most common insertion method (332/377, 88.1%). For site selection, the radial artery was preferred for peripheral placement (97.3%), and the femoral artery for central cannulation (81.1%). There was substantial variability in the reported indications for arterial catheter use, with 68.9% considering single vasoactive support as an indication.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates wide practice variation in arterial catheter placement among pediatric ICU clinicians, despite the existence of some practice guidelines. Future research should focus on addressing gaps in evidence, particularly around ultrasound-guided techniques and securement methods, to optimize practices and improve outcomes.

动脉导管置入的实践差异:一项儿科重症护理从业人员的调查。
在重症监护医学中,对于何时需要动脉导管没有共识,也没有证据表明动脉导管可以改善患者的预后。picu间AC的使用有很大的差异,与疾病严重程度无关。目的探讨小儿重症监护临床医生动脉导管置入的特点,并确定在技术、适应症和态度方面的实践差异。DesignAnonymous,横断面网络调查。测量和主要结果数据收集自93家机构的377名儿科重症护理从业人员。大多数是主治医生(n = 215, 57.0%)或研究员(n = 141, 37.4%)。52.0%(196/377)的被调查者始终使用超声放置动脉导管,同行比主治医师更可能使用超声(P = 0.005)。Seldinger技术是最常见的插入方法(332/377,88.1%)。在位置选择上,桡动脉首选外周置管(97.3%),股动脉首选中央置管(81.1%)。报告的动脉导管使用适应症有很大的差异,68.9%的人认为单一血管活性支持是一种适应症。结论:本研究表明,尽管存在一些实践指南,但儿科ICU临床医生在动脉导管放置方面存在广泛的实践差异。未来的研究应侧重于解决证据方面的差距,特别是在超声引导技术和安全方法方面,以优化实践和改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信