Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Devika A Shenoy, Abigail VanLonkhuyzen, Bradley Q Fox, Sabrina M Morales, Sai H Rachakonda, Gina Upchurch, Anna Hung
{"title":"Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.","authors":"Devika A Shenoy, Abigail VanLonkhuyzen, Bradley Q Fox, Sabrina M Morales, Sai H Rachakonda, Gina Upchurch, Anna Hung","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selecting a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan can be challenging because of limited health insurance literacy and complex plan features. Existing online tools, such as the Medicare Plan Finder (MPF), often lack personalization.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the conceptualization and development of a personalized Medicare Part D decision aid (DA) to supplement the MPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A user-centered, iterative design process informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and International Patient Decision Aid Standards was used to develop a DA that helps older adults with Part D plan selection. First, a literature review and 1-hour interviews with Medicare-eligible individuals informed the development of a prototype. These individuals formed a stakeholder advisory board (SAB). The first prototype was then alpha tested with 2 SAB focus groups. Using focus group feedback, the final prototype was developed. Beta testing participants, including Medicare-eligible individuals and Medicare counselors, were recruited and completed an online version of the DA, alongside pre-DA and post-DA questionnaires to examine DA effectiveness using a modified Health Insurance Literacy Measure, a modified System Usability Scale, and a user satisfaction survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the development of the prototype, SAB interviewees (n = 9) suggested that simplified explanations of insurance terminology and side-by-side comparisons of options would be important to the DA. Alpha testing (n = 7) feedback was used to modify the first prototype to improve usability and clarity. Among 25 beta testing participants, Health Insurance Literacy Measure scores increased from 19.76 (SD = 7.15) before using the aid to 24.13 (SD = 4.02) afterward (<i>P</i> = 0.0009). Approximately one-quarter of participants indicated that they would change to a new plan after the tool, whereas half affirmed that the DA validated their existing plan choice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study shows that a user-centered, interactive DA can improve health insurance literacy and support Medicare Part D plan decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 9","pages":"868-878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selecting a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan can be challenging because of limited health insurance literacy and complex plan features. Existing online tools, such as the Medicare Plan Finder (MPF), often lack personalization.

Objective: To describe the conceptualization and development of a personalized Medicare Part D decision aid (DA) to supplement the MPF.

Methods: A user-centered, iterative design process informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and International Patient Decision Aid Standards was used to develop a DA that helps older adults with Part D plan selection. First, a literature review and 1-hour interviews with Medicare-eligible individuals informed the development of a prototype. These individuals formed a stakeholder advisory board (SAB). The first prototype was then alpha tested with 2 SAB focus groups. Using focus group feedback, the final prototype was developed. Beta testing participants, including Medicare-eligible individuals and Medicare counselors, were recruited and completed an online version of the DA, alongside pre-DA and post-DA questionnaires to examine DA effectiveness using a modified Health Insurance Literacy Measure, a modified System Usability Scale, and a user satisfaction survey.

Results: Before the development of the prototype, SAB interviewees (n = 9) suggested that simplified explanations of insurance terminology and side-by-side comparisons of options would be important to the DA. Alpha testing (n = 7) feedback was used to modify the first prototype to improve usability and clarity. Among 25 beta testing participants, Health Insurance Literacy Measure scores increased from 19.76 (SD = 7.15) before using the aid to 24.13 (SD = 4.02) afterward (P = 0.0009). Approximately one-quarter of participants indicated that they would change to a new plan after the tool, whereas half affirmed that the DA validated their existing plan choice.

Conclusions: This pilot study shows that a user-centered, interactive DA can improve health insurance literacy and support Medicare Part D plan decisions.

解决复杂性:一个用户友好的医疗保险D部分患者决策辅助工具的开发和试点测试。
背景:选择医疗保险D部分处方药计划可能具有挑战性,因为有限的健康保险知识和复杂的计划特点。现有的在线工具,如医疗保险计划查找器(MPF),往往缺乏个性化。目的:描述个性化医疗保险D部分决策辅助(DA)的概念和发展,以补充强积金。方法:在渥太华决策支持框架和国际患者决策辅助标准的指导下,采用以用户为中心的迭代设计过程来开发数据分析,帮助老年人选择D部分计划。首先,通过文献综述和与符合医疗保险条件的个人进行1小时的访谈,为原型的开发提供信息。这些人组成了一个利益相关者咨询委员会(SAB)。第一个原型随后在2个SAB焦点小组中进行了alpha测试。根据焦点小组的反馈,最终的原型被开发出来。包括符合医疗保险条件的个人和医疗保险顾问在内的Beta测试参与者被招募并完成了在线DA版本,以及DA前和DA后的问卷调查,以使用修改后的健康保险素养测量、修改后的系统可用性量表和用户满意度调查来检查DA的有效性。结果:在原型开发之前,SAB受访者(n = 9)认为简化保险术语解释和并列比较选项对DA很重要。Alpha测试(n = 7)反馈用于修改第一个原型,以提高可用性和清晰度。在25名beta测试参与者中,健康保险素养测量得分从使用援助前的19.76 (SD = 7.15)增加到使用援助后的24.13 (SD = 4.02) (P = 0.0009)。大约四分之一的参与者表示他们会在使用工具后更换新的计划,而一半的人肯定DA验证了他们现有的计划选择。结论:该试点研究表明,以用户为中心的交互式数据分析可以提高健康保险素养,并支持医疗保险D部分计划决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信