Understanding the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with Huntington's disease.
Noelle E Carlozzi, Jonathan P Troost, Wendy L Lombard, Jennifer A Miner, Praveen Dayalu
{"title":"Understanding the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with Huntington's disease.","authors":"Noelle E Carlozzi, Jonathan P Troost, Wendy L Lombard, Jennifer A Miner, Praveen Dayalu","doi":"10.1177/18796397251366313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGiven the progressive cognitive decline in Huntington's disease (HD), most research in this population relies solely on objective assessments of symptoms and function, rather than on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to understand how PRO measures relate to clinician-rated assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with HD.MethodsWe enrolled N = 52 participants with HD in this study. Participants completed several self-reported PROs as well as clinician-administered assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of related concepts. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were used to examine the concordance among PROs, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures.ResultsThere were strong relationships among PROs that assessed related concepts. There were also strong relationships between PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments of physical functioning (chorea, sleep/fatigue) and mental health, and slightly less robust relationships between the PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments for speech/swallowing and cognition. Relationships between PROs and associated performance-based measures were moderate for chorea/motor functioning, but negligible for sleep/fatigue and cognition.ConclusionsFindings from this study support the construct validity of PROs that assess motor functioning and mental health among individuals with HD and indicate that PROs and clinician-rated assessments of these constructs (i.e., motor functioning and mental health) provide complementary information. On the other hand, the negligible relationships between PROs and associated performance-based cognitive tests and between PROs and associated wearable device-based estimates of sleep and physical activity indicate that reliance solely on HD patients' self-report for these concepts might be misleading.</p>","PeriodicalId":16042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Huntington's disease","volume":" ","pages":"18796397251366313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Huntington's disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18796397251366313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundGiven the progressive cognitive decline in Huntington's disease (HD), most research in this population relies solely on objective assessments of symptoms and function, rather than on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.ObjectiveThe purpose of this paper is to understand how PRO measures relate to clinician-rated assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of symptoms and functioning in people with HD.MethodsWe enrolled N = 52 participants with HD in this study. Participants completed several self-reported PROs as well as clinician-administered assessments and performance-based measures (cognitive tests and device-based estimates) of related concepts. Pearson correlations and linear regression models were used to examine the concordance among PROs, clinician-rated assessments, and performance-based measures.ResultsThere were strong relationships among PROs that assessed related concepts. There were also strong relationships between PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments of physical functioning (chorea, sleep/fatigue) and mental health, and slightly less robust relationships between the PROs and associated clinician-rated assessments for speech/swallowing and cognition. Relationships between PROs and associated performance-based measures were moderate for chorea/motor functioning, but negligible for sleep/fatigue and cognition.ConclusionsFindings from this study support the construct validity of PROs that assess motor functioning and mental health among individuals with HD and indicate that PROs and clinician-rated assessments of these constructs (i.e., motor functioning and mental health) provide complementary information. On the other hand, the negligible relationships between PROs and associated performance-based cognitive tests and between PROs and associated wearable device-based estimates of sleep and physical activity indicate that reliance solely on HD patients' self-report for these concepts might be misleading.