The Shifting and Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatments and Surgical Platforms on Oncological Outcomes and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A 23-Year Retrospective Experience.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Niyaz Shadmanov, Vusal Aliyev, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
{"title":"The Shifting and Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatments and Surgical Platforms on Oncological Outcomes and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A 23-Year Retrospective Experience.","authors":"Niyaz Shadmanov, Vusal Aliyev, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01303-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate how advancements in surgical technology and evolving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) protocols have influenced clinical, pathological, and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced distal rectal cancer (LADRC). Particular emphasis is placed on how the evolving practice of a single high-volume colorectal surgeon has mirrored these developments over a 23-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort included 561 patients with LADRC who underwent NAT between 2001 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the year 2013, which marked the institutional adoption of robotic surgery, high-resolution 3-Tesla MRI, and the formal implementation of the Watch-and-Wait (W&W) strategy: Group I (2001-2012) and Group II (2013-2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was significantly longer in Group 1 (191 ± 2.29 months) compared to Group 2 (71 ± 2.81 months). Local recurrence (LR) occurred in 11.6% of patients in Group 1 and 6.9% in Group 2 (p = 0.107), while distant metastasis (DM) was observed in 15.5% and 10.6%, respectively (p = 0.178) (Fig. 2). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 67.4% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8) in Group 1 and 80.1% (95% CI: 75.6-83.8) in Group 2 (p = 0.003). At 10 years, DFS was 65.2% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8) and 79.4% (95% CI: 74.7-83.3) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.006). Similarly, overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 78.0% (95% CI: 67.6-82.4) in Group 1 and 91.7% (95% CI: 87.9-93.3) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). At 10 years, OS was 73.4% (95% CI: 66.0-81.1) and 90.5% (95% CI: 87.3-92.9), respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, permanent stoma-free survival (PSFS) improved significantly over time, from 56.5% in Group 1 to 85.8% in Group 2 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of robotic surgery, high-resolution MRI, and the W&W strategy has significantly improved oncological outcomes and sphincter preservation rates in patients with LADRC over the past two decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01303-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate how advancements in surgical technology and evolving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) protocols have influenced clinical, pathological, and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced distal rectal cancer (LADRC). Particular emphasis is placed on how the evolving practice of a single high-volume colorectal surgeon has mirrored these developments over a 23-year period.

Methods: This retrospective cohort included 561 patients with LADRC who underwent NAT between 2001 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the year 2013, which marked the institutional adoption of robotic surgery, high-resolution 3-Tesla MRI, and the formal implementation of the Watch-and-Wait (W&W) strategy: Group I (2001-2012) and Group II (2013-2024).

Results: The median follow-up duration was significantly longer in Group 1 (191 ± 2.29 months) compared to Group 2 (71 ± 2.81 months). Local recurrence (LR) occurred in 11.6% of patients in Group 1 and 6.9% in Group 2 (p = 0.107), while distant metastasis (DM) was observed in 15.5% and 10.6%, respectively (p = 0.178) (Fig. 2). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 67.4% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8) in Group 1 and 80.1% (95% CI: 75.6-83.8) in Group 2 (p = 0.003). At 10 years, DFS was 65.2% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8) and 79.4% (95% CI: 74.7-83.3) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.006). Similarly, overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 78.0% (95% CI: 67.6-82.4) in Group 1 and 91.7% (95% CI: 87.9-93.3) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). At 10 years, OS was 73.4% (95% CI: 66.0-81.1) and 90.5% (95% CI: 87.3-92.9), respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, permanent stoma-free survival (PSFS) improved significantly over time, from 56.5% in Group 1 to 85.8% in Group 2 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The integration of robotic surgery, high-resolution MRI, and the W&W strategy has significantly improved oncological outcomes and sphincter preservation rates in patients with LADRC over the past two decades.

转移和发展的新辅助治疗和手术平台对远端直肠癌肿瘤预后和括约肌保存的影响:23年的回顾性经验。
目的:本研究旨在评估手术技术的进步和不断发展的新辅助治疗(NAT)方案如何影响局部晚期远端直肠癌(LADRC)患者的临床、病理和长期肿瘤预后。特别强调的是一个单一的大容量结直肠外科医生的实践如何在23年的时间里反映了这些发展。方法:该回顾性队列包括561例2001年至2024年间接受NAT治疗的LADRC患者。患者根据2013年分为两组:第一组(2001-2012年)和第二组(2013-2024年),2013年标志着机构采用机器人手术、高分辨率3-Tesla MRI,并正式实施观察和等待(W&W)策略。结果:组1的中位随访时间(191±2.29个月)明显长于组2(71±2.81个月)。1组患者局部复发(LR)比例为11.6%,2组为6.9% (p = 0.107),远处转移(DM)比例分别为15.5%和10.6% (p = 0.178)(图2)。1组5年无病生存率(DFS)为67.4% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8), 2组为80.1% (95% CI: 75.6-83.8) (p = 0.003)。10年时,第1组和第2组的DFS分别为65.2% (95% CI: 58.6-74.8)和79.4% (95% CI: 74.7-83.3) (p = 0.006)。同样,第1组5年的总生存率(OS)为78.0% (95% CI: 67.6-82.4),第2组为91.7% (95% CI: 87.9-93.3) (p结论:机器人手术、高分辨率MRI和W&W策略的结合在过去20年中显著改善了LADRC患者的肿瘤预后和括约肌保存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信