"I Am Reluctant to Continue, Yet Know She Could Go into Withdrawal": A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Requests for eConsults in Opioid Management in the Ambulatory Setting.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Laila Khalid, Sharon Rikin, Dana Watnick, Tiffany Y Lu, Gianni Carrozzi, Ana Valle, Joanna L Starrels
{"title":"\"I Am Reluctant to Continue, Yet Know She Could Go into Withdrawal\": A Qualitative Analysis of Clinician Requests for eConsults in Opioid Management in the Ambulatory Setting.","authors":"Laila Khalid, Sharon Rikin, Dana Watnick, Tiffany Y Lu, Gianni Carrozzi, Ana Valle, Joanna L Starrels","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09811-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic consultations (eConsults) allow clinicians to submit questions through the electronic health records (EHR) to request specialist input about individual patients' care, but there is paucity of literature describing eConsult programs specifically for opioid management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1. To understand clinicians' reasons for seeking eConsults for opioid management. 2. To describe characteristics of clinicians' questions that can be addressed through eConsults without requiring in-person specialist visits.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective qualitative study of eConsults for opioid management in the ambulatory setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinicians who submitted an eConsult request for opioid management.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We conducted a qualitative content analysis of eConsult requests and responses. First, a priori codes were developed and applied to textual data. Through iterative discussion and memoing, thematic codes were identified and applied to the dataset. Subsequently, breadth and depth of codes were explored, collapsed, and redefined, and relationships between codes were discussed. Following theme development, matrix analysis was used to compare eConsults that resulted with or without a recommendation for an in-person specialist visit.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Forty eConsults were requested by 30 unique referring clinicians mostly from general internal medicine (53%) or family medicine (27%). We identified four themes: (1) clinicians were motivated to reduce harm, (2) clinicians had difficulty labeling opioid misuse and use disorder (OUD), (3) clinicians had difficulty articulating discrete questions, and (4) clinician questions revealed knowledge gaps in opioid management. In-person specialist visits were recommended when clinicians needed help with labeling opioid misuse or OUD or when questions were vague and around complex topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians have unease and discomfort in treating chronic pain and managing opioids. eConsults are most helpful for low-complexity, discrete questions from clinicians focused on reducing harm. eConsult implementation should integrate EHR enhancements and clinician training in assessing opioid misuse and OUD and articulating discrete questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09811-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic consultations (eConsults) allow clinicians to submit questions through the electronic health records (EHR) to request specialist input about individual patients' care, but there is paucity of literature describing eConsult programs specifically for opioid management.

Objectives: 1. To understand clinicians' reasons for seeking eConsults for opioid management. 2. To describe characteristics of clinicians' questions that can be addressed through eConsults without requiring in-person specialist visits.

Design: Retrospective qualitative study of eConsults for opioid management in the ambulatory setting.

Participants: Clinicians who submitted an eConsult request for opioid management.

Approach: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of eConsult requests and responses. First, a priori codes were developed and applied to textual data. Through iterative discussion and memoing, thematic codes were identified and applied to the dataset. Subsequently, breadth and depth of codes were explored, collapsed, and redefined, and relationships between codes were discussed. Following theme development, matrix analysis was used to compare eConsults that resulted with or without a recommendation for an in-person specialist visit.

Key results: Forty eConsults were requested by 30 unique referring clinicians mostly from general internal medicine (53%) or family medicine (27%). We identified four themes: (1) clinicians were motivated to reduce harm, (2) clinicians had difficulty labeling opioid misuse and use disorder (OUD), (3) clinicians had difficulty articulating discrete questions, and (4) clinician questions revealed knowledge gaps in opioid management. In-person specialist visits were recommended when clinicians needed help with labeling opioid misuse or OUD or when questions were vague and around complex topics.

Conclusion: Clinicians have unease and discomfort in treating chronic pain and managing opioids. eConsults are most helpful for low-complexity, discrete questions from clinicians focused on reducing harm. eConsult implementation should integrate EHR enhancements and clinician training in assessing opioid misuse and OUD and articulating discrete questions.

“我不愿意继续,但知道她可以进入戒断”:门诊设置阿片类药物管理的临床医生要求咨询的定性分析。
背景:电子咨询(eConsults)允许临床医生通过电子健康记录(EHR)提交问题,以要求专家输入有关个体患者护理的信息,但缺乏专门描述阿片类药物管理的eConsult方案的文献。目的:1。了解临床医生寻求阿片类药物管理咨询的原因。2. 描述临床医生问题的特征,这些问题可以通过咨询结果来解决,而不需要亲自去看专家。设计:回顾性定性研究门诊阿片类药物管理的结果。参与者:提交了阿片类药物管理eConsult请求的临床医生。方法:对eConsult请求和回复进行定性内容分析。首先,开发了先验代码并将其应用于文本数据。通过反复讨论和记忆,确定主题代码并将其应用于数据集。随后,对代码的广度和深度进行了探索、分解和重新定义,并讨论了代码之间的关系。在主题发展之后,使用矩阵分析来比较有或没有建议亲自进行专家访问的eConsults结果。主要结果:30名独特的转诊临床医生要求进行40次咨询,主要来自普通内科(53%)或家庭医学(27%)。我们确定了四个主题:(1)临床医生有减少伤害的动机,(2)临床医生难以标记阿片类药物滥用和使用障碍(OUD),(3)临床医生难以阐明离散问题,(4)临床医生的问题揭示了阿片类药物管理方面的知识差距。当临床医生需要帮助标记阿片类药物滥用或OUD或当问题模糊和围绕复杂主题时,建议亲自进行专家访问。结论:临床医生在治疗慢性疼痛和管理阿片类药物时存在不安和不适。咨询结果对临床医生专注于减少伤害的低复杂性、离散问题最有帮助。会诊实施应整合电子病历增强和临床医生培训,以评估阿片类药物滥用和OUD,并阐明离散问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信