Progesterone Challenge Test in Screening of Endometrial Pathologic Lesions in High-Risk Post-Menopausal Women.

Afsaneh Tehranian, Hanieh Alambeygi, Sheida Abbasi, Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi, Marjan Ghaemi, Rana Karimi
{"title":"Progesterone Challenge Test in Screening of Endometrial Pathologic Lesions in High-Risk Post-Menopausal Women.","authors":"Afsaneh Tehranian, Hanieh Alambeygi, Sheida Abbasi, Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi, Marjan Ghaemi, Rana Karimi","doi":"10.18502/jfrh.v19i2.19298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the progesterone challenge test (PCT) in the diagnosis of hyperplastic and cancerous endometrium in high-risk postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 72 postmenopausal women without abnormal uterine bleeding who had risk factors for endometrial cancer were recruited. Patients with endometrial thickness of 4 mm or more as determined transvaginal ultrasonography were tested with progesterone challenge test. If there were any bleeding (spotting to severe bleeding) in the next two weeks, the test would be considered positive. After two weeks, all of the participants despite the result of PCT underwent office endometrial biopsy. In the end, all the results of PCT were compared with endometrial biopsy results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 57.7 ±8.15 years. The progesterone challenge test was positive in 17 women (22%). Among the participants with positive progesterone challenge test, most of them show hyperplasia (62.5%) and 4.2% show endometrial cancer. According to the results, PCT had 37.5% accuracy, 20.8% sensitivity, 70.8 % specificity, 58.8% positive predictive value (PPV), and 30.9 % negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of endometrial pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suggest that due to the unacceptable sensitivity and specificity of the PCT, this test alone is not suitable for screening of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15845,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Reproductive Health","volume":"19 2","pages":"106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v19i2.19298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the progesterone challenge test (PCT) in the diagnosis of hyperplastic and cancerous endometrium in high-risk postmenopausal women.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 72 postmenopausal women without abnormal uterine bleeding who had risk factors for endometrial cancer were recruited. Patients with endometrial thickness of 4 mm or more as determined transvaginal ultrasonography were tested with progesterone challenge test. If there were any bleeding (spotting to severe bleeding) in the next two weeks, the test would be considered positive. After two weeks, all of the participants despite the result of PCT underwent office endometrial biopsy. In the end, all the results of PCT were compared with endometrial biopsy results.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 57.7 ±8.15 years. The progesterone challenge test was positive in 17 women (22%). Among the participants with positive progesterone challenge test, most of them show hyperplasia (62.5%) and 4.2% show endometrial cancer. According to the results, PCT had 37.5% accuracy, 20.8% sensitivity, 70.8 % specificity, 58.8% positive predictive value (PPV), and 30.9 % negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of endometrial pathology.

Conclusion: We suggest that due to the unacceptable sensitivity and specificity of the PCT, this test alone is not suitable for screening of endometrial cancer or hyperplasia.

黄体酮激发试验在高危绝经后妇女子宫内膜病变筛查中的应用。
目的:探讨孕酮激发试验(PCT)在高危绝经后妇女子宫内膜增生性和癌性诊断中的预后价值。材料和方法:在本横断面研究中,招募了72名具有子宫内膜癌危险因素但无异常子宫出血的绝经后妇女。经阴道超声检查子宫内膜厚度≥4mm的患者行孕酮激发试验。如果在接下来的两周内有任何出血(少量出血到严重出血),测试将被认为是阳性的。两周后,不管PCT结果如何,所有的参与者都进行了子宫内膜活检。最后,将所有PCT结果与子宫内膜活检结果进行比较。结果:患者平均年龄57.7±8.15岁。黄体酮激发试验阳性17例(22%)。在孕酮激发试验阳性的参与者中,大部分为增生(62.5%),4.2%为子宫内膜癌。结果显示,PCT诊断子宫内膜病理的准确性为37.5%,敏感性为20.8%,特异性为70.8%,阳性预测值(PPV)为58.8%,阴性预测值(NPV)为30.9%。结论:我们认为由于PCT的敏感性和特异性不能接受,单独使用该检查不适合筛查子宫内膜癌或增生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family & Reproductive Health (JFRH) is the quarterly official journal of Vali–e–Asr Reproductive Health Research Center. This journal features fulllength, peerreviewed papers reporting original research, clinical case histories, review articles, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the scientific and medical aspects of reproductive physiology and pathology including genetics, endocrinology, andrology, embryology, gynecologic urology, fetomaternal medicine, oncology, infectious disease, public health, nutrition, surgery, menopause, family planning, infertility, psychiatry–psychology, demographic modeling, perinatalogy–neonatolgy ethics and social issues, and pharmacotherapy. A high scientific and editorial standard is maintained throughout the journal along with a regular rate of publication. All published articles will become the property of the JFRH. The editor and publisher accept no responsibility for the statements expressed by the authors here in. Also they do not guarantee, warrant or endorse any product or service advertised in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信