Dynamic Relevance Between Reflux Events and Esophageal Motility in Patients With Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Si Hui Lin, Zhi Feng Wang, Hua Li, Xiao Hong Sun, Xiao Qing Li, Gui Jun Fei, Wei Guang Chen, Tao Guo, Mei Yun Ke, Xiu Cai Fang
{"title":"Dynamic Relevance Between Reflux Events and Esophageal Motility in Patients With Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease","authors":"Si Hui Lin,&nbsp;Zhi Feng Wang,&nbsp;Hua Li,&nbsp;Xiao Hong Sun,&nbsp;Xiao Qing Li,&nbsp;Gui Jun Fei,&nbsp;Wei Guang Chen,&nbsp;Tao Guo,&nbsp;Mei Yun Ke,&nbsp;Xiu Cai Fang","doi":"10.1111/1751-2980.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The association between reflux events and esophageal motility abnormality is unclear. We aimed to determine the relevance between reflux events and esophageal motility in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with PPI-refractory or PPI-responsive GERD were enrolled. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH–impedance–pressure monitoring was performed. Reflux symptoms, reflux events, and esophageal motility during acid reflux episodes were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty patients with PPI-refractory GERD and 18 with PPI-responsive GERD were included, all of whom had pathological gastroesophageal reflux. There were no significant differences in the major acid reflux parameters (DeMeester score and proportion of patients with acid exposure time &gt; 6%) between the two groups. However, the number of long acid reflux episodes and the time length of the longest reflux episodes were significantly higher in the PPI-refractory GERD group than in the PPI-responsive GERD group (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Moreover, patients with PPI-refractory GERD had higher rates of ineffective primary (62.0% vs. 36.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and secondary peristalsis (83.5% vs. 57.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) during long acid exposure (LAE) than those with PPI-responsive GERD. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD having LAE had a significantly lower frequency of primary and secondary peristalsis per minute and required a longer time to initiate secondary peristalsis than those without during their longest acid reflux period in the upright position (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Longer acid reflux episodes in patients with PPI-refractory GERD might result from frequent ineffective primary esophageal peristalsis and delayed initiation of effective secondary peristalsis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"26 5-6","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1751-2980.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-2980.70007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The association between reflux events and esophageal motility abnormality is unclear. We aimed to determine the relevance between reflux events and esophageal motility in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

Patients with PPI-refractory or PPI-responsive GERD were enrolled. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH–impedance–pressure monitoring was performed. Reflux symptoms, reflux events, and esophageal motility during acid reflux episodes were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

Sixty patients with PPI-refractory GERD and 18 with PPI-responsive GERD were included, all of whom had pathological gastroesophageal reflux. There were no significant differences in the major acid reflux parameters (DeMeester score and proportion of patients with acid exposure time > 6%) between the two groups. However, the number of long acid reflux episodes and the time length of the longest reflux episodes were significantly higher in the PPI-refractory GERD group than in the PPI-responsive GERD group (both p < 0.05). Moreover, patients with PPI-refractory GERD had higher rates of ineffective primary (62.0% vs. 36.0%, p < 0.001) and secondary peristalsis (83.5% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.001) during long acid exposure (LAE) than those with PPI-responsive GERD. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD having LAE had a significantly lower frequency of primary and secondary peristalsis per minute and required a longer time to initiate secondary peristalsis than those without during their longest acid reflux period in the upright position (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Longer acid reflux episodes in patients with PPI-refractory GERD might result from frequent ineffective primary esophageal peristalsis and delayed initiation of effective secondary peristalsis.

Abstract Image

质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病患者反流事件与食管运动的动态相关性
目的:反流事件与食管运动异常之间的关系尚不清楚。我们旨在确定质子泵抑制剂(PPI)难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)中反流事件与食管运动之间的相关性。方法:纳入ppi难治性或ppi反应性胃食管反流患者。进行24小时食管ph -阻抗-压力动态监测。记录反流症状、反流事件和胃酸反流发作时的食管运动,并对两组进行比较。结果:纳入60例ppi难治性胃食管反流患者和18例ppi反应性胃食管反流患者,均为病理性胃食管反流。两组患者的主要胃酸反流参数(DeMeester评分和酸暴露时间患者比例bbb6%)无显著差异。然而,ppi难治性GERD组胃酸反流的长时间发作次数和最长反流发作时间明显高于ppi反应性GERD组(均为p结论:ppi难治性GERD患者胃酸反流发作时间较长可能是由于频繁的原发性食管蠕动无效和有效的继发性蠕动延迟开始所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Journal of Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Diseases is the official English-language journal of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is published twelve times per year and includes peer-reviewed original papers, review articles and commentaries concerned with research relating to the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, biliary tract and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信