The Future Is Mobile: Pilot Validation Study of Apple Health Metrics in Orthopaedic Trauma.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Dane J Brodke, Brian M Shear, Haley Demyanovich, Vivian Li, Alice Bell, David Okhuereigbe, Nelson F SooHoo, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Nathan N O'Hara
{"title":"The Future Is Mobile: Pilot Validation Study of Apple Health Metrics in Orthopaedic Trauma.","authors":"Dane J Brodke, Brian M Shear, Haley Demyanovich, Vivian Li, Alice Bell, David Okhuereigbe, Nelson F SooHoo, Gerard P Slobogean, Robert V O'Toole, Nathan N O'Hara","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons often lack objective data on patient functional outcomes, particularly as compared with the patient's baseline. The present study aimed to determine whether gait parameters recorded on Apple iPhones provided longitudinal mobility data following lower-extremity fracture surgery that matched clinical expectations. We hypothesized that iPhones would detect the mobility changes of injury and early recovery, correlate with patient-reported outcome measures, and differentiate nonunion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 107 adult patients with lower-extremity fractures who owned iPhones and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Participants shared Apple Health data and completed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. The primary outcome was the daily step count. Four other gait-related parameters were analyzed: walking asymmetry, double support, walking speed, and step length. Mixed-effects models compared mobility parameters at pre-injury, immediate post-injury, and 6-months post-injury time points. Correlations between mobility parameters and PROMIS surveys were assessed. A mixed-effect model evaluated the relationship between step count recovery and surgery for nonunion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a 93% reduction in daily step count from the pre-injury period to the immediate post-injury period (95% confidence interval [CI], -94% to -93%). Other gait parameters also showed increased impairment from pre-injury to post-injury. At 6 months, step count improved sixfold relative to the immediate post-injury period but remained 52% below baseline (95% CI, -55% to -49%). PROMIS Physical Function correlated moderately with step count (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.57) and weakly with other gait parameters. Patients with a known nonunion had a 55% slower recovery of step count than those without a nonunion (95% CI: 44% to 66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Apple Health mobility parameters captured changes in mobility following lower-extremity fracture and throughout the subsequent recovery period. These metrics distinguished between patients with and without nonunions, demonstrating their potential usefulness as objective, real-world functional outcome measures. These \"digital biomarkers\" may aid clinical decision-making and research and could be utilized for the early identification of patients at risk for poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":"107 16","pages":"1825-1832"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgeons often lack objective data on patient functional outcomes, particularly as compared with the patient's baseline. The present study aimed to determine whether gait parameters recorded on Apple iPhones provided longitudinal mobility data following lower-extremity fracture surgery that matched clinical expectations. We hypothesized that iPhones would detect the mobility changes of injury and early recovery, correlate with patient-reported outcome measures, and differentiate nonunion.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 107 adult patients with lower-extremity fractures who owned iPhones and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Participants shared Apple Health data and completed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. The primary outcome was the daily step count. Four other gait-related parameters were analyzed: walking asymmetry, double support, walking speed, and step length. Mixed-effects models compared mobility parameters at pre-injury, immediate post-injury, and 6-months post-injury time points. Correlations between mobility parameters and PROMIS surveys were assessed. A mixed-effect model evaluated the relationship between step count recovery and surgery for nonunion.

Results: There was a 93% reduction in daily step count from the pre-injury period to the immediate post-injury period (95% confidence interval [CI], -94% to -93%). Other gait parameters also showed increased impairment from pre-injury to post-injury. At 6 months, step count improved sixfold relative to the immediate post-injury period but remained 52% below baseline (95% CI, -55% to -49%). PROMIS Physical Function correlated moderately with step count (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.57) and weakly with other gait parameters. Patients with a known nonunion had a 55% slower recovery of step count than those without a nonunion (95% CI: 44% to 66%).

Conclusions: Apple Health mobility parameters captured changes in mobility following lower-extremity fracture and throughout the subsequent recovery period. These metrics distinguished between patients with and without nonunions, demonstrating their potential usefulness as objective, real-world functional outcome measures. These "digital biomarkers" may aid clinical decision-making and research and could be utilized for the early identification of patients at risk for poor outcomes.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

未来是移动的:苹果健康指标在骨科创伤中的试点验证研究。
背景:外科医生通常缺乏关于患者功能结局的客观数据,特别是与患者基线相比较。本研究旨在确定在苹果iphone上记录的步态参数是否提供了符合临床预期的下肢骨折手术后的纵向活动数据。我们假设iphone可以检测损伤和早期恢复的活动能力变化,与患者报告的结果测量相关联,并区分骨不连。方法:本横断面研究纳入107例拥有iphone的成年下肢骨折患者,随访至少6个月。参与者分享Apple Health数据并完成患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)调查。主要结果是每日步数。分析了与步态相关的其他四个参数:步行不对称、双支撑、步行速度和步长。混合效应模型比较损伤前、损伤后立即和损伤后6个月时间点的活动能力参数。评估了流动性参数与PROMIS调查之间的相关性。混合效应模型评估步数恢复与手术治疗骨不连之间的关系。结果:从损伤前到损伤后,每日步数减少了93%(95%置信区间[CI], -94%至-93%)。其他步态参数也显示从损伤前到损伤后损伤增加。6个月时,步数相对于损伤后立即改善了6倍,但仍比基线低52% (95% CI, -55%至-49%)。PROMIS Physical Function与步数有中度相关性(r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 ~ 0.57),与其他步态参数相关性较弱。已知骨不连的患者步数恢复比没有骨不连的患者慢55% (95% CI: 44%至66%)。结论:Apple Health活动度参数捕获了下肢骨折后以及随后整个恢复期活动度的变化。这些指标区分了有和没有骨不连的患者,证明了它们作为客观的、现实世界的功能结果测量的潜在用途。这些“数字生物标志物”可能有助于临床决策和研究,并可用于早期识别有不良预后风险的患者。证据等级:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信