Geriatric Assessment: ASCO Global Guideline.

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1200/GO-25-00276
Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Sarah Temin, Haydee C Verduzco-Aguirre, Matti S Aapro, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Zeba Aziz, María de la Concepción Pérez de Celis Herrero, Trinanjan Basu, Martine Extermann, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Bogda Koczwara, Kah Poh Loh, Elene Mariamidze, Alex Baleka Mutombo, Vanita Noronha, Grant R Williams, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
{"title":"Geriatric Assessment: ASCO Global Guideline.","authors":"Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Sarah Temin, Haydee C Verduzco-Aguirre, Matti S Aapro, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Zeba Aziz, María de la Concepción Pérez de Celis Herrero, Trinanjan Basu, Martine Extermann, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Bogda Koczwara, Kah Poh Loh, Elene Mariamidze, Alex Baleka Mutombo, Vanita Noronha, Grant R Williams, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis","doi":"10.1200/GO-25-00276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To guide clinicians and policymakers in global resource-constrained settings to assess the geriatric needs of patients older than 65 years with cancer when Maximal-setting guideline-recommended resources are unavailable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel reviewed existing ASCO guidelines and conducted modified ADAPTE and formal consensus processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An ASCO resource-neutral guideline was adapted for resource-constrained settings, informing one round of formal consensus; recommendations received ≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Recommendations: </strong>The Expert Panel endorses the Maximal-setting guideline's overarching recommendation that end users utilize geriatric assessment (GA), including essential domains, to identify \"vulnerabilities or impairments not routinely captured in oncology assessment for all older patients over 65 years old with cancer.\" All care plans for patients with cancer over 65 years old receiving systemic therapy with GA-identified deficits should include GA-guided management. A geriatric evaluation should at a minimum include the use of a brief geriatric screening tool. Tools in the Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) are validated in multiple languages, but users may use more appropriate tools in some settings and languages, if they include the relevant guideline-specified domains. Maximal-resource settings of high-income countries have traditionally developed cutoffs for GA-identified deficits, but locally validated research and practice may inform differing cutoffs. If validated all-cause mortality prognosis tools do not adequately represent the setting, clinicians may use actuarial life-expectancy tables with quartiles of overall health status.<i>Additional information can be found at</i> www.asco.org/global-guidelines<i>. It is the view of ASCO that health care clinicians and health care system decision makers should be guided by the recommendations for the highest stratum of resources available. The guideline is intended to complement but not replace local guidelines.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2500276"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-25-00276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To guide clinicians and policymakers in global resource-constrained settings to assess the geriatric needs of patients older than 65 years with cancer when Maximal-setting guideline-recommended resources are unavailable.

Methods: A multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel reviewed existing ASCO guidelines and conducted modified ADAPTE and formal consensus processes.

Results: An ASCO resource-neutral guideline was adapted for resource-constrained settings, informing one round of formal consensus; recommendations received ≥75% agreement.

Recommendations: The Expert Panel endorses the Maximal-setting guideline's overarching recommendation that end users utilize geriatric assessment (GA), including essential domains, to identify "vulnerabilities or impairments not routinely captured in oncology assessment for all older patients over 65 years old with cancer." All care plans for patients with cancer over 65 years old receiving systemic therapy with GA-identified deficits should include GA-guided management. A geriatric evaluation should at a minimum include the use of a brief geriatric screening tool. Tools in the Practical Geriatric Assessment (PGA) are validated in multiple languages, but users may use more appropriate tools in some settings and languages, if they include the relevant guideline-specified domains. Maximal-resource settings of high-income countries have traditionally developed cutoffs for GA-identified deficits, but locally validated research and practice may inform differing cutoffs. If validated all-cause mortality prognosis tools do not adequately represent the setting, clinicians may use actuarial life-expectancy tables with quartiles of overall health status.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/global-guidelines. It is the view of ASCO that health care clinicians and health care system decision makers should be guided by the recommendations for the highest stratum of resources available. The guideline is intended to complement but not replace local guidelines.

老年评估:ASCO全球指南。
目的:在全球资源受限的情况下,指导临床医生和政策制定者评估65岁以上癌症患者在无法获得最大设定指南推荐的资源时的老年需求。方法:一个多学科、多国专家小组审查了现有的ASCO指南,并进行了修改后的ADAPTE和正式的共识过程。结果:ASCO资源中立指南适用于资源受限的环境,通知了一轮正式共识;建议获得≥75%的同意。建议:专家小组赞同Maximal-setting指南的总体建议,即最终用户使用老年评估(GA),包括基本领域,以确定“所有65岁以上的老年癌症患者肿瘤评估中未常规捕获的脆弱性或损伤”。所有65岁以上的癌症患者接受全身治疗并确定ga缺陷的护理计划应包括ga指导的管理。老年评估至少应该包括使用一个简短的老年筛查工具。实用老年评估(PGA)中的工具以多种语言进行验证,但用户可以在某些设置和语言中使用更合适的工具,如果它们包括相关指南指定的领域。高收入国家的最大资源设置传统上为ga确定的赤字制定了截止点,但经过当地验证的研究和实践可能会提供不同的截止点。如果经过验证的全因死亡率预测工具不能充分代表情况,临床医生可以使用带有整体健康状况四分位数的精算预期寿命表。更多信息请访问www.asco.org/global-guidelines。ASCO认为,卫生保健临床医生和卫生保健系统决策者应以可获得的最高资源阶层的建议为指导。该指南旨在补充但不取代地方指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信