Artificial intelligence software to detect small hepatic lesions on hepatobiliary-phase images using multiscale sampling.

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Shogo Maeda, Yuko Nakamura, Toru Higaki, Ayu Karasudani, Tatsuya Yamaguchi, Masaki Ishihara, Takayuki Baba, Shota Kondo, Dara Fonseca, Kazuo Awai
{"title":"Artificial intelligence software to detect small hepatic lesions on hepatobiliary-phase images using multiscale sampling.","authors":"Shogo Maeda, Yuko Nakamura, Toru Higaki, Ayu Karasudani, Tatsuya Yamaguchi, Masaki Ishihara, Takayuki Baba, Shota Kondo, Dara Fonseca, Kazuo Awai","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01859-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of multiscale sampling artificial intelligence (msAI) software adapted to small hepatic lesions on the diagnostic performance of readers interpreting gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HBP images of 30 patients harboring 186 hepatic lesions were included. Three board-certified radiologists, 9 radiology residents, and 2 general physicians interpreted HBP image data sets twice, once with and once without the msAI software at 2-week intervals. Jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the figure of merit (FOM) for detecting hepatic lesions. The negative consultation ratio (NCR), percentage of correct diagnoses turning into incorrect by the AI software, was calculated. We defined readers whose NCR was lower than 10% as those correctly diagnosed the false findings presented by the software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The msAI software significantly improved the lesion localization fraction (LLF) for all readers (0.74 vs 0.82, p < 0.01); the FOM did not (0.76 vs 0.78, p = 0.45). In lesion-size-based subgroup analysis, the LLF (0.40 vs 0.53, p < 0.01) improved significantly with the AI software even for lesions smaller than 6 mm, whereas the FOM (0.63 vs 0.66, p = 0.51) showed no significant difference. Among 10 readers with an NCR lower than 10%, not only the LLF but also the FOM were significantly better with the software (LLF 0.77 vs 0.82, FOM 0.79 vs 0.84, both p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detectability of small hepatic lesions on HBP images was improved with msAI software especially when its results were properly evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01859-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of multiscale sampling artificial intelligence (msAI) software adapted to small hepatic lesions on the diagnostic performance of readers interpreting gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images.

Methods: HBP images of 30 patients harboring 186 hepatic lesions were included. Three board-certified radiologists, 9 radiology residents, and 2 general physicians interpreted HBP image data sets twice, once with and once without the msAI software at 2-week intervals. Jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the figure of merit (FOM) for detecting hepatic lesions. The negative consultation ratio (NCR), percentage of correct diagnoses turning into incorrect by the AI software, was calculated. We defined readers whose NCR was lower than 10% as those correctly diagnosed the false findings presented by the software.

Results: The msAI software significantly improved the lesion localization fraction (LLF) for all readers (0.74 vs 0.82, p < 0.01); the FOM did not (0.76 vs 0.78, p = 0.45). In lesion-size-based subgroup analysis, the LLF (0.40 vs 0.53, p < 0.01) improved significantly with the AI software even for lesions smaller than 6 mm, whereas the FOM (0.63 vs 0.66, p = 0.51) showed no significant difference. Among 10 readers with an NCR lower than 10%, not only the LLF but also the FOM were significantly better with the software (LLF 0.77 vs 0.82, FOM 0.79 vs 0.84, both p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The detectability of small hepatic lesions on HBP images was improved with msAI software especially when its results were properly evaluated.

采用多尺度采样的人工智能软件检测肝胆相图像上的小肝脏病变。
目的:探讨适用于小肝脏病变的多尺度采样人工智能(msAI)软件对解读加多etic酸增强肝胆期(HBP)图像的阅读器诊断性能的影响。方法:收集30例肝脏病变186个的HBP图像。3名委员会认证的放射科医生、9名放射科住院医师和2名普通医生每两周对HBP图像数据集进行两次解释,一次使用msAI软件,一次不使用msAI软件。采用刀切自由反应受体-操作特性分析来计算检测肝脏病变的优点值(FOM)。计算了人工智能软件正确诊断变为错误诊断的负咨询率(NCR)。我们将NCR低于10%的读者定义为正确诊断出软件呈现的错误发现的读者。结果:msAI软件显著提高了所有阅读器的病灶定位分数(LLF) (0.74 vs 0.82, p)。结论:msAI软件提高了HBP图像上肝脏小病变的检出率,特别是在正确评估结果的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信