Alicia Shin, Seonyoung Kang, Jinhyung Jung, In Young Cho, Kyungdo Han, Seonghye Kim, Se Yun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyungjin Kim
{"title":"The association between rheumatoid arthritis and stroke risk by serologic status and stroke subtypes.","authors":"Alicia Shin, Seonyoung Kang, Jinhyung Jung, In Young Cho, Kyungdo Han, Seonghye Kim, Se Yun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyungjin Kim","doi":"10.1177/17474930251377174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an increased stroke risk, but associations by serostatus (seropositive RA (SPRA) vs seronegative RA (SNRA)) and with subtypes of stroke (ischemic stroke (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke (HS)) are not well established. In addition, it is not well-known whether the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are associated with altered stroke risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide cohort study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and included participants who were first diagnosed with RA in the period 2010-2017 with no previous history of stroke, and who had a health checkup within 2 years before the index date (45,175 RA patients). They were compared (1:3 ratio) with non-RA controls matched by age and sex (135,525 non-RA controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with RA had a significantly higher risk of both IS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1.58) and HS (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50) compared to controls. SPRA patients showed higher risk for both IS (aHR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.43-1.69 SPRA vs aHR = 1.23, 1.08-1.41 SNRA) and HS (aHR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.21-1.62 SPRA vs aHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.86-1.38 SNRA). No difference in stroke risk was observed between bDMARDs users and non-users (aHR = 1.66 for users, aHR = 1.41 for non-users). However, potential differences were noted with tsDMARDs use (aHR = 0.81 for users vs aHR = 1.43 for non-users), although not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RA are at significantly greater risk for both IS and HS compared to those without RA, and SPRA patients showed higher risk than SNRA patients. Further studies are required to determine the potential of tsDMARDs in the prevention of stroke in RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251377174"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251377174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an increased stroke risk, but associations by serostatus (seropositive RA (SPRA) vs seronegative RA (SNRA)) and with subtypes of stroke (ischemic stroke (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke (HS)) are not well established. In addition, it is not well-known whether the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are associated with altered stroke risk.
Methods: This nationwide cohort study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and included participants who were first diagnosed with RA in the period 2010-2017 with no previous history of stroke, and who had a health checkup within 2 years before the index date (45,175 RA patients). They were compared (1:3 ratio) with non-RA controls matched by age and sex (135,525 non-RA controls).
Results: Patients with RA had a significantly higher risk of both IS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1.58) and HS (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50) compared to controls. SPRA patients showed higher risk for both IS (aHR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.43-1.69 SPRA vs aHR = 1.23, 1.08-1.41 SNRA) and HS (aHR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.21-1.62 SPRA vs aHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.86-1.38 SNRA). No difference in stroke risk was observed between bDMARDs users and non-users (aHR = 1.66 for users, aHR = 1.41 for non-users). However, potential differences were noted with tsDMARDs use (aHR = 0.81 for users vs aHR = 1.43 for non-users), although not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Patients with RA are at significantly greater risk for both IS and HS compared to those without RA, and SPRA patients showed higher risk than SNRA patients. Further studies are required to determine the potential of tsDMARDs in the prevention of stroke in RA.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.