A systematic review and meta-analysis of x-ray therapy versus proton beam therapy for pediatric central nervous system germ cell tumors: TRP-Germinoma 2025.
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of x-ray therapy versus proton beam therapy for pediatric central nervous system germ cell tumors: TRP-Germinoma 2025.","authors":"Sho Hosaka, Masashi Mizumoto, Hiroko Fukushima, Takashi Iizumi, Takashi Saito, Masako Inaba, Ryoko Suzuki, Yinuo Li, Kei Nakai, Shosei Shimizu, Yoshiko Oshiro, Kazushi Maruo, Hidetoshi Takada, Hideyuki Sakurai","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02863-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Central nervous system germ cell tumors (CNS-GCTs) are rare pediatric tumors, categorized into germinomas and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs). Proton-beam therapy (PBT) has been introduced as an alternative to X-ray therapy (XRT) for minimizing radiation exposure to normal brain tissue, but evidence comparing these treatment modalities is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using PubMed for studies published between 1990 and 2022. Studies reporting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for CNS-GCTs treated with PBT or XRT were included. Random-effects meta-analyses compared 3- and 5-year OS and PFS between treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one studies were selected, with 36 on XRT and five on PBT. In germinoma patients, no significant differences were found between XRT and PBT for 3-year OS (95.3% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3158), 5-year OS (94.8% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3088), 3-year PFS (90.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.1045), or 5-year PFS (89.2% vs 91.7%, p = 0.4676). The collected data were insufficient to evaluate PBT in NGGCTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBT and XRT showed comparable survival outcomes in germinoma. Further research is required to explore PBT's potential benefits in preserving cognitive function or reducing secondary cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1906-1915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02863-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Central nervous system germ cell tumors (CNS-GCTs) are rare pediatric tumors, categorized into germinomas and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs). Proton-beam therapy (PBT) has been introduced as an alternative to X-ray therapy (XRT) for minimizing radiation exposure to normal brain tissue, but evidence comparing these treatment modalities is limited.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using PubMed for studies published between 1990 and 2022. Studies reporting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for CNS-GCTs treated with PBT or XRT were included. Random-effects meta-analyses compared 3- and 5-year OS and PFS between treatment modalities.
Results: Forty-one studies were selected, with 36 on XRT and five on PBT. In germinoma patients, no significant differences were found between XRT and PBT for 3-year OS (95.3% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3158), 5-year OS (94.8% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3088), 3-year PFS (90.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.1045), or 5-year PFS (89.2% vs 91.7%, p = 0.4676). The collected data were insufficient to evaluate PBT in NGGCTs.
Conclusion: PBT and XRT showed comparable survival outcomes in germinoma. Further research is required to explore PBT's potential benefits in preserving cognitive function or reducing secondary cancers.
中枢神经系统生殖细胞肿瘤(cns - gct)是一种罕见的儿科肿瘤,分为生殖细胞瘤和非生殖细胞瘤生殖细胞肿瘤(NGGCTs)。质子束治疗(PBT)已被引入作为x射线治疗(XRT)的替代方案,以尽量减少正常脑组织的辐射暴露,但比较这些治疗方式的证据有限。方法:根据PRISMA指南,使用PubMed对1990年至2022年间发表的研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。研究报告了PBT或XRT治疗的cns - gct的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。随机效应荟萃分析比较了不同治疗方式的3年和5年OS和PFS。结果:入选41项研究,其中XRT 36例,PBT 5例。在生殖细胞瘤患者中,XRT和PBT在3年OS (95.3% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3158)、5年OS (94.8% vs 97.8%, p = 0.3088)、3年PFS (90.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.1045)或5年PFS (89.2% vs 91.7%, p = 0.4676)方面均无显著差异。收集的数据不足以评估nggct的PBT。结论:PBT和XRT治疗生殖细胞瘤的生存率相当。需要进一步的研究来探索PBT在保持认知功能或减少继发性癌症方面的潜在益处。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.