Evaluating the implementation of a patient engagement mHealth application in clinical infection prevention.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Robbert Gerard Bentvelsen, Rosalie van der Vaart, Niels H Chavannes, Karin Ellen Veldkamp
{"title":"Evaluating the implementation of a patient engagement mHealth application in clinical infection prevention.","authors":"Robbert Gerard Bentvelsen, Rosalie van der Vaart, Niels H Chavannes, Karin Ellen Veldkamp","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Successful implementation of patient engagement (PE) and mHealth could reduce inappropriate catheter use and Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Insight into patient acceptance, impact on PE and quality of care, potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an mHealth intervention could improve the impact of both current and future infection prevention programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation of the smartphone app \"Participatient\" was evaluated in four Dutch hospitals. Patient questionnaires assessed the acceptability of the app and its impact. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) were interviewed to evaluate the implementation process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acceptability constructs were evaluated positively. PE and quality of care were rated high before and after implementation. All 22 HCPs perceived barriers, eg incomplete training for HCPs and unclear communication on roles; and lack of promotion by ward professionals. The principal facilitator was the HCPs' positive attitude toward PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>App users perceived the Participatient app as acceptable, which fulfills a precondition for implementation. The implementation strategy evaluated in the present study was designed to fulfill all the conditions considered crucial for implementation. Nevertheless, the level of adoption remained low, and HCPs still imputed their failure to promote the use of the app to insufficiencies in training and communication and to a misfit between the app and their existing workflow. These findings underscore the need to verify whether there may be additional, less evident barriers to the adoption of mHealth tools that support PE in general, and more specifically, to the adoption of Participatient to engage patients in preventing CAUTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Successful implementation of patient engagement (PE) and mHealth could reduce inappropriate catheter use and Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Insight into patient acceptance, impact on PE and quality of care, potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an mHealth intervention could improve the impact of both current and future infection prevention programs.

Methods: Implementation of the smartphone app "Participatient" was evaluated in four Dutch hospitals. Patient questionnaires assessed the acceptability of the app and its impact. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) were interviewed to evaluate the implementation process.

Results: Acceptability constructs were evaluated positively. PE and quality of care were rated high before and after implementation. All 22 HCPs perceived barriers, eg incomplete training for HCPs and unclear communication on roles; and lack of promotion by ward professionals. The principal facilitator was the HCPs' positive attitude toward PE.

Conclusions: App users perceived the Participatient app as acceptable, which fulfills a precondition for implementation. The implementation strategy evaluated in the present study was designed to fulfill all the conditions considered crucial for implementation. Nevertheless, the level of adoption remained low, and HCPs still imputed their failure to promote the use of the app to insufficiencies in training and communication and to a misfit between the app and their existing workflow. These findings underscore the need to verify whether there may be additional, less evident barriers to the adoption of mHealth tools that support PE in general, and more specifically, to the adoption of Participatient to engage patients in preventing CAUTIs.

评估患者参与移动医疗应用在临床感染预防中的实施情况。
目的:成功实施患者参与(PE)和移动健康可以减少不适当的导尿管使用和导尿管相关的尿路感染(CAUTIs)。深入了解患者接受程度、对PE和护理质量的影响、实施移动医疗干预的潜在障碍和促进因素,可以改善当前和未来感染预防项目的影响。方法:对智能手机应用“particippatient”在荷兰四家医院的实施情况进行评估。患者调查问卷评估了该应用程序的可接受性及其影响。访谈医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)以评估实施过程。结果:可接受性构念得到积极评价。实施前后的PE和护理质量评分较高。所有22名医务人员都认为存在障碍,如医务人员培训不完整、角色沟通不明确;缺乏专业人员的提拔。主要的促进因素是医护人员对体育的积极态度。结论:应用程序用户认为particippatient应用程序是可接受的,这满足了实施的先决条件。本研究评估的执行战略旨在满足被认为对执行至关重要的所有条件。尽管如此,采用的水平仍然很低,hcp仍然将他们未能推广应用程序的使用归咎于培训和沟通的不足,以及应用程序与现有工作流程之间的不匹配。这些发现强调有必要验证是否可能存在额外的、不太明显的障碍,以采用一般支持PE的移动健康工具,更具体地说,采用particippatient来吸引患者参与预防CAUTIs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信