Computer-Aided Detection Colonoscopy for Surveillance in IBD Patients: Insights from a Single-Center Experience.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Adam Goldman, Levy Idan, Shomron Ben-Horin, Uri Kopylov, Asaf Levartovsky
{"title":"Computer-Aided Detection Colonoscopy for Surveillance in IBD Patients: Insights from a Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Adam Goldman, Levy Idan, Shomron Ben-Horin, Uri Kopylov, Asaf Levartovsky","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The real-world efficacy of computer-aided detection (CADe) in improving surveillance colonoscopy performance for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-center study of surveillance colonoscopies in patients with IBD. Only colonoscopies indicated for surveillance, with adequate preparation and documented cecal intubation, were included. The study compared the collective adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the periods before (pre-CADe) (June 2020 to June 2021) and after (July 2021 to September 2022) the introduction of the CADe in all endoscopy units. An adjusted ADR was calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 225 eligible colonoscopies performed during the pre-CADe period and 750 during the CADe period. Neoplastic lesions or colorectal cancer were detected in 13 (5.8%) of 225 procedures in the pre-CADe period and 27 (3.6%) of 750 procedures during the CADe period. The collective ADR was 5.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.9-6.6) in the pre-CADe period and 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.5) -following CADe implementation (P = .315). Subgroup analyses stratified by endoscopist experience, IBD type, and procedure timing (daytime vs after hours) corroborated a similar nonsignificant declining trend in ADR after CADe introduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-world, single-center experience, the introduction of CADe did not improve neoplasms detection in patients with IBD and was associated with a nonsignificant decline in ADR. These findings call into question the utility of generic CADe systems in IBD surveillance and emphasize the need to foster IBD-specific CADe systems, as well as addressing challenges arising from physician-artificial intelligence interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The real-world efficacy of computer-aided detection (CADe) in improving surveillance colonoscopy performance for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been established.

Methods: A retrospective, single-center study of surveillance colonoscopies in patients with IBD. Only colonoscopies indicated for surveillance, with adequate preparation and documented cecal intubation, were included. The study compared the collective adenoma detection rate (ADR) between the periods before (pre-CADe) (June 2020 to June 2021) and after (July 2021 to September 2022) the introduction of the CADe in all endoscopy units. An adjusted ADR was calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model.

Results: The study included 225 eligible colonoscopies performed during the pre-CADe period and 750 during the CADe period. Neoplastic lesions or colorectal cancer were detected in 13 (5.8%) of 225 procedures in the pre-CADe period and 27 (3.6%) of 750 procedures during the CADe period. The collective ADR was 5.2% (95% confidence interval, 3.9-6.6) in the pre-CADe period and 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.5) -following CADe implementation (P = .315). Subgroup analyses stratified by endoscopist experience, IBD type, and procedure timing (daytime vs after hours) corroborated a similar nonsignificant declining trend in ADR after CADe introduction.

Conclusions: In a real-world, single-center experience, the introduction of CADe did not improve neoplasms detection in patients with IBD and was associated with a nonsignificant decline in ADR. These findings call into question the utility of generic CADe systems in IBD surveillance and emphasize the need to foster IBD-specific CADe systems, as well as addressing challenges arising from physician-artificial intelligence interactions.

计算机辅助结肠镜检查对IBD患者的监测:来自单中心经验的见解。
目的:计算机辅助检测(CADe)在改善炎症性肠病(IBD)患者结肠镜监测性能方面的实际疗效尚未确定。方法:对IBD患者的监测结肠镜进行回顾性、单中心研究。仅包括有充分准备和记录盲肠插管的指示监测结肠镜检查。该研究比较了在所有内窥镜检查单位引入CADe之前(预CADe)(2020年6月至2021年6月)和之后(2021年7月至2022年9月)期间的集体腺瘤检出率(ADR)。采用多变量logistic回归模型计算调整后的ADR。结果:该研究包括225例在CADe前期和750例在CADe期间进行的符合条件的结肠镜检查。在CADe前的225例手术中有13例(5.8%)检测到肿瘤病变或结直肠癌,在CADe期间的750例手术中有27例(3.6%)。总体不良反应在CADe前为5.2%(95%可信区间,3.9-6.6),在CADe实施后为3.8%(95%可信区间,1.1-6.5)(P = .315)。根据内窥镜医师经验、IBD类型和手术时间(白天与夜间)分层的亚组分析证实了CADe引入后ADR类似的无显著下降趋势。结论:在现实世界的单中心实验中,CADe的引入并没有改善IBD患者的肿瘤检测,并且与不良反应的无显著下降相关。这些发现对通用CADe系统在IBD监测中的效用提出了质疑,并强调需要培养IBD特异性CADe系统,以及解决医生与人工智能相互作用带来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信