Knowledge translation platforms: Broker, intermediary or more? A scoping review of definitions, functions and characteristics.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
B Schmidt, C Mulopo, L Mayieka, S Cooper, A Jaca, C Späth, J Oliver, N S Jessani
{"title":"Knowledge translation platforms: Broker, intermediary or more? A scoping review of definitions, functions and characteristics.","authors":"B Schmidt, C Mulopo, L Mayieka, S Cooper, A Jaca, C Späth, J Oliver, N S Jessani","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01383-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge translation platforms (KTPs), also referred to as intermediaries, play a key role in supporting evidence-informed decision-making. Numerous KTPs exist globally, striving to translate evidence into policy. However, these platforms are described in varying ways, and some KTPs do not explicitly identify themselves as such. This makes identification, recognition and leveraging of KTPs suboptimal. It also hinders opportunities for learning, adapting and scaling of such platforms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to synthesize the literature on the variety of definitions, functions and characteristics of a KTP with a view to harmonize these aspects of KTPs and offer a revised framework of functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted using recommended methods and reporting guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) using a predetermined search strategy, without date or geographical restrictions. Included studies were analysed and synthesized in ATLAS.ti, following Braun and Clarke's six steps of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>With one exception, all KTPs did not identify themselves as such in their names. Five common elements emerged across the KTP definitions: (i) a physical or virtual platform (ii) that engages with and convenes different stakeholders (iii) through a set of knowledge translation activities and outputs (iv) to contribute to health decision-making. We identified KTP activities that aligned with the core functions described in the Valmeekanathan et al. (Valmeekanathan et al. in Tert Educ Manag 27:227-256, 2021) framework - namely knowledge exchange, dialogue and capacity - but also additional activities, including engaging funders, planning for sustainability and scalability, providing training grants and initiating innovative knowledge translation processes that integrate knowledge across projects and sectors to maximize impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides a synthesized definition of KTPs while expanding on the three core functions described in the Valmeekanathan et al. (Valmeekanathan et al. in Tert Educ Manag 27:227-256, 2021) framework. To maximize their impact, sustained investment, stronger institutional support and integration into national policy ecosystems are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01383-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knowledge translation platforms (KTPs), also referred to as intermediaries, play a key role in supporting evidence-informed decision-making. Numerous KTPs exist globally, striving to translate evidence into policy. However, these platforms are described in varying ways, and some KTPs do not explicitly identify themselves as such. This makes identification, recognition and leveraging of KTPs suboptimal. It also hinders opportunities for learning, adapting and scaling of such platforms.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to synthesize the literature on the variety of definitions, functions and characteristics of a KTP with a view to harmonize these aspects of KTPs and offer a revised framework of functions.

Methods: This review was conducted using recommended methods and reporting guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) using a predetermined search strategy, without date or geographical restrictions. Included studies were analysed and synthesized in ATLAS.ti, following Braun and Clarke's six steps of thematic analysis.

Findings: With one exception, all KTPs did not identify themselves as such in their names. Five common elements emerged across the KTP definitions: (i) a physical or virtual platform (ii) that engages with and convenes different stakeholders (iii) through a set of knowledge translation activities and outputs (iv) to contribute to health decision-making. We identified KTP activities that aligned with the core functions described in the Valmeekanathan et al. (Valmeekanathan et al. in Tert Educ Manag 27:227-256, 2021) framework - namely knowledge exchange, dialogue and capacity - but also additional activities, including engaging funders, planning for sustainability and scalability, providing training grants and initiating innovative knowledge translation processes that integrate knowledge across projects and sectors to maximize impact.

Conclusion: This review provides a synthesized definition of KTPs while expanding on the three core functions described in the Valmeekanathan et al. (Valmeekanathan et al. in Tert Educ Manag 27:227-256, 2021) framework. To maximize their impact, sustained investment, stronger institutional support and integration into national policy ecosystems are essential.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

知识翻译平台:经纪人、中介还是更多?定义、功能和特征的范围审查。
背景:知识翻译平台(KTPs),也被称为中介,在支持循证决策方面发挥着关键作用。全球有许多ktp,努力将证据转化为政策。然而,这些平台以不同的方式描述,一些ktp没有明确地将自己标识为这样。这使得ktp的识别、识别和利用不是最优的。这也阻碍了这些平台的学习、适应和扩展机会。目的:本综述旨在综合有关KTP的各种定义、功能和特征的文献,以协调KTP的这些方面,并提供一个修订的功能框架。方法:本综述采用推荐的方法和报告指南进行。在PubMed、Scopus和护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)中进行检索,使用预定的检索策略,没有日期或地理限制。纳入的研究在ATLAS中进行分析和综合。遵循Braun和Clarke的主题分析六步。结果:除了一个例外,所有的ktp都没有在他们的名字中表明自己的身份。在KTP定义中出现了五个共同要素:(i)物理或虚拟平台;(ii)与不同利益攸关方接触和召集;(iii)通过一套知识转化活动和产出;(iv)促进卫生决策。我们确定了与Valmeekanathan等人(Valmeekanathan等人在Tert Educ management 27:27 - 255,2021)框架中描述的核心功能一致的KTP活动-即知识交流,对话和能力-以及其他活动,包括吸引资助者,规划可持续性和可扩展性,提供培训资助和启动创新知识翻译流程,整合跨项目和部门的知识,以最大限度地发挥影响。结论:本综述提供了KTPs的综合定义,同时扩展了Valmeekanathan等人(Valmeekanathan等人在Tert Educ manage 27:27 - 255,2021)框架中描述的三个核心功能。为了最大限度地发挥其影响,持续投资、加强体制支持和融入国家政策生态系统至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信