Paul McLaughlin, Pratima Chowdary, Catherine Harrison, David Stephensen, Nathalie Roussel
{"title":"Gap Analysis Investigating Healthcare Professionals’ Skills and Knowledge for Pain Management in Haemophilia—A Qualitative Study","authors":"Paul McLaughlin, Pratima Chowdary, Catherine Harrison, David Stephensen, Nathalie Roussel","doi":"10.1111/hae.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>People with haemophilia continue to experience pain impacting activities of daily living despite the advances in haemostatic treatments. Although guidelines exist, pain management in the clinical setting remains inadequate. It is unclear why this gap in practice persists. This study aimed to explore the practice and experience of pain management by haemophilia healthcare professionals (HCPs) to better understand perceived competency and barriers/facilitators to appropriate care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>European HCPs working ≥ 3 years in haemophilia care were invited to participate (haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals). Data were collected using profession-specific focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews, recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three HCPs (6 haematologists, 7 nurses, 6 physiotherapists, 4 psychosocial professionals) from 10 European countries agreed to participate. Four themes were constructed: (1) Defining who is responsible: the challenges in multidisciplinary team provision for good pain management; (2) the concept of pain and its management exists in multiple temporalities; (3) aspirations for better pain management are limited by prevailing biomedicalism; (4) pain management can be better—knowledge and experience improves confidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>These data demonstrate a gap in confidence in the delivery of effective pain management, influenced by individual knowledge and skills and wider geographical determinants of healthcare delivery. There is a need for services to establish who is responsible for pain management and better understand professional role identity. Mechanisms to support the implementation of better pain care in haemophilia need to be explored.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":"31 5","pages":"988-996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.70112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
People with haemophilia continue to experience pain impacting activities of daily living despite the advances in haemostatic treatments. Although guidelines exist, pain management in the clinical setting remains inadequate. It is unclear why this gap in practice persists. This study aimed to explore the practice and experience of pain management by haemophilia healthcare professionals (HCPs) to better understand perceived competency and barriers/facilitators to appropriate care.
Methods
European HCPs working ≥ 3 years in haemophilia care were invited to participate (haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals). Data were collected using profession-specific focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews, recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results
Twenty-three HCPs (6 haematologists, 7 nurses, 6 physiotherapists, 4 psychosocial professionals) from 10 European countries agreed to participate. Four themes were constructed: (1) Defining who is responsible: the challenges in multidisciplinary team provision for good pain management; (2) the concept of pain and its management exists in multiple temporalities; (3) aspirations for better pain management are limited by prevailing biomedicalism; (4) pain management can be better—knowledge and experience improves confidence.
Discussion
These data demonstrate a gap in confidence in the delivery of effective pain management, influenced by individual knowledge and skills and wider geographical determinants of healthcare delivery. There is a need for services to establish who is responsible for pain management and better understand professional role identity. Mechanisms to support the implementation of better pain care in haemophilia need to be explored.
期刊介绍:
Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include:
clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI
replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies
component therapy in the developing world
transfusion transmitted disease
haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics
nursing
laboratory diagnosis
carrier detection
psycho-social concerns
economic issues
audit
inherited platelet disorders.