Feasibility of Administering the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Questionnaire Through the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) and Comparison of Data From the Two Sources.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Haemophilia Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1111/hae.70117
Federico Germini, Carlo Cossa, Elisabetta Trinari, Emma Iserman, Quazi Ibrahim, Drashti Pete, Arun Keepanasseril, David Page, Mark W Skinner, Alfonso Iorio
{"title":"Feasibility of Administering the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Questionnaire Through the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) and Comparison of Data From the Two Sources.","authors":"Federico Germini, Carlo Cossa, Elisabetta Trinari, Emma Iserman, Quazi Ibrahim, Drashti Pete, Arun Keepanasseril, David Page, Mark W Skinner, Alfonso Iorio","doi":"10.1111/hae.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire can be used to measure quality of life in persons with haemophilia (PWH) and is integrated in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR). This offers the opportunity to compare the same data inputted by patients in PROBE and their treating team in CBDR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting PROBE data through CBDR and to compare the data collected from these two sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study among PWH using MyCBDR. Participants were invited to digitally complete the PROBE questionnaire at baseline and to repeat it at 6 and 12 months. Additional data were passively collected through CBDR. Data from PROBE and CBDR were compared using Kappa agreement, intraclass correlation (ICC) and Pearson correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 PWH participated. Recruitment ratios were 21.1% and 12.0% for the two phases. Retention rates were 40.8% at 6 months and 32.4% at 12 months. Three hundred thirteen subjects were involved in the comparison between PROBE and CBDR data. The agreement was good to very good (κ > 0.75) or the correlation very strong, with the exception of the history of inhibitor (κ = 0.57), recent bleeds (κ = 0.48) and current treatment regimen (κ = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of PROBE with CBDR is feasible and PROBE is a reliable tool for routine PRO data collection. Its use in clinical practice may improve data quality and personalized and patient-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire can be used to measure quality of life in persons with haemophilia (PWH) and is integrated in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR). This offers the opportunity to compare the same data inputted by patients in PROBE and their treating team in CBDR.

Aim: Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting PROBE data through CBDR and to compare the data collected from these two sources.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study among PWH using MyCBDR. Participants were invited to digitally complete the PROBE questionnaire at baseline and to repeat it at 6 and 12 months. Additional data were passively collected through CBDR. Data from PROBE and CBDR were compared using Kappa agreement, intraclass correlation (ICC) and Pearson correlation.

Results: A total of 142 PWH participated. Recruitment ratios were 21.1% and 12.0% for the two phases. Retention rates were 40.8% at 6 months and 32.4% at 12 months. Three hundred thirteen subjects were involved in the comparison between PROBE and CBDR data. The agreement was good to very good (κ > 0.75) or the correlation very strong, with the exception of the history of inhibitor (κ = 0.57), recent bleeds (κ = 0.48) and current treatment regimen (κ = 0.57).

Conclusion: The integration of PROBE with CBDR is feasible and PROBE is a reliable tool for routine PRO data collection. Its use in clinical practice may improve data quality and personalized and patient-centred care.

通过加拿大出血性疾病登记处(CBDR)管理患者报告的结果、负担和经历(PROBE)问卷的可行性以及两个来源数据的比较
患者报告的结果、负担和经历(PROBE)问卷可用于衡量血友病(PWH)患者的生活质量,并被纳入加拿大出血性疾病登记处(CBDR)。这为比较PROBE患者及其治疗团队在CBDR中输入的相同数据提供了机会。目的:我们的目的是评估通过CBDR收集探针数据的可行性,并比较从这两种来源收集的数据。方法:采用MyCBDR对PWH患者进行前瞻性观察研究。参与者被邀请在基线时以数字方式完成PROBE问卷,并在6个月和12个月时重复该问卷。通过CBDR被动收集其他数据。PROBE和CBDR的数据采用Kappa一致性、类内相关(ICC)和Pearson相关进行比较。结果:共有142名PWH参与。两个阶段的招聘率分别为21.1%和12.0%。6个月留存率为40.8%,12个月留存率为32.4%。333名受试者参与了PROBE和CBDR数据的比较。除抑制剂史(κ = 0.57)、近期出血史(κ = 0.48)和当前治疗方案(κ = 0.57)外,一致性从好到非常好(κ > 0.75)或相关性非常强。结论:PROBE与CBDR结合是可行的,是常规PRO数据采集的可靠工具。它在临床实践中的使用可以提高数据质量和个性化和以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Haemophilia
Haemophilia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
28.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include: clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies component therapy in the developing world transfusion transmitted disease haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics nursing laboratory diagnosis carrier detection psycho-social concerns economic issues audit inherited platelet disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信