Exploring the relationship between pain catastrophizing and migraine in youth: A longitudinal clinical cohort study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1111/head.15039
Alexis Espanioli, Nynke J van den Hoogen, Jonathan Kuziek, Kirsten Sjonnesen, Melanie Noel, Serena L Orr
{"title":"Exploring the relationship between pain catastrophizing and migraine in youth: A longitudinal clinical cohort study.","authors":"Alexis Espanioli, Nynke J van den Hoogen, Jonathan Kuziek, Kirsten Sjonnesen, Melanie Noel, Serena L Orr","doi":"10.1111/head.15039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the relationship between pain catastrophizing and migraine-related outcomes (i.e., migraine-related disability and headache frequency) between visits with a neurologist in a clinical population of children and adolescents with migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence from adult populations suggests that pain catastrophizing, the tendency to magnify the threat value of, and ruminate and feel helpless about, pain may be associated with migraine-related outcomes, but the association in children and adolescents is less clear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective longitudinal clinical cohort study, children and adolescents aged 8-18 years with migraine completed headache questionnaires and a validated measure of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children) at baseline and initial follow-up visits with a neurologist. Recruitment spanned from May 2019 to July 2023. Headache frequency and migraine-related disability (Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment) were assessed at both visits. Migraine outcomes at follow-up were examined in relation to baseline pain catastrophizing scores in models that controlled for sex, age, preventive treatment use, baseline headache frequency, and baseline disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For this study, 121 consenting participants were included. In models adjusted for age, sex, baseline headache frequency, baseline disability, and preventive treatment use, baseline pain catastrophizing scores were significantly associated with disability scores at follow-up (β = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-1.48, p = 0.020), but not with headache frequency at follow-up (β = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.19, p = 0.575). When examining the specific subscales of pain catastrophizing in an adjusted model, only baseline pain magnification (β = 6.73, 95% CI = 2.95-10.51, p = 0.001) had a significant association with disability at follow-up, while feelings of helplessness (β = 0.08, 95% CI = -2.11 to 2.27, p = 0.944) and rumination did not (β = -1.83, 95% CI = -4.22 to 0.56, p = 0.133). In a subset of participants with pain catastrophizing measured at both visits (n = 65), pain catastrophizing total and subscale scores did not significantly differ between visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline pain catastrophizing scores were associated with migraine-related disability, but not headache frequency, at follow-up in a clinical population of children and adolescents with migraine. Pain magnification specifically appeared to drive this association. Future studies should aim to replicate our results and to investigate if interventions aimed specifically at reducing pain magnification may help to mitigate migraine-related disability in children and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1369-1380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the relationship between pain catastrophizing and migraine-related outcomes (i.e., migraine-related disability and headache frequency) between visits with a neurologist in a clinical population of children and adolescents with migraine.

Background: Evidence from adult populations suggests that pain catastrophizing, the tendency to magnify the threat value of, and ruminate and feel helpless about, pain may be associated with migraine-related outcomes, but the association in children and adolescents is less clear.

Methods: In this prospective longitudinal clinical cohort study, children and adolescents aged 8-18 years with migraine completed headache questionnaires and a validated measure of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children) at baseline and initial follow-up visits with a neurologist. Recruitment spanned from May 2019 to July 2023. Headache frequency and migraine-related disability (Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment) were assessed at both visits. Migraine outcomes at follow-up were examined in relation to baseline pain catastrophizing scores in models that controlled for sex, age, preventive treatment use, baseline headache frequency, and baseline disability.

Results: For this study, 121 consenting participants were included. In models adjusted for age, sex, baseline headache frequency, baseline disability, and preventive treatment use, baseline pain catastrophizing scores were significantly associated with disability scores at follow-up (β = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-1.48, p = 0.020), but not with headache frequency at follow-up (β = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.19, p = 0.575). When examining the specific subscales of pain catastrophizing in an adjusted model, only baseline pain magnification (β = 6.73, 95% CI = 2.95-10.51, p = 0.001) had a significant association with disability at follow-up, while feelings of helplessness (β = 0.08, 95% CI = -2.11 to 2.27, p = 0.944) and rumination did not (β = -1.83, 95% CI = -4.22 to 0.56, p = 0.133). In a subset of participants with pain catastrophizing measured at both visits (n = 65), pain catastrophizing total and subscale scores did not significantly differ between visits.

Conclusion: Baseline pain catastrophizing scores were associated with migraine-related disability, but not headache frequency, at follow-up in a clinical population of children and adolescents with migraine. Pain magnification specifically appeared to drive this association. Future studies should aim to replicate our results and to investigate if interventions aimed specifically at reducing pain magnification may help to mitigate migraine-related disability in children and adolescents.

Abstract Image

一项纵向临床队列研究:探讨青年疼痛灾难化与偏头痛之间的关系。
目的:本研究探讨在儿童和青少年偏头痛患者的临床就诊中,疼痛灾变与偏头痛相关结局(即偏头痛相关残疾和头痛频率)之间的关系。背景:来自成人人群的证据表明,疼痛灾难化,放大疼痛威胁值的倾向,以及对疼痛的反思和无助感可能与偏头痛相关的结果有关,但儿童和青少年的关联尚不清楚。方法:在这项前瞻性纵向临床队列研究中,8-18岁患有偏头痛的儿童和青少年在基线和初次随访时完成了头痛问卷和有效的疼痛灾变量表(儿童疼痛灾变量表)。招聘时间为2019年5月至2023年7月。在两次就诊时评估头痛频率和偏头痛相关残疾(儿科偏头痛残疾评估)。在控制了性别、年龄、预防性治疗使用、基线头痛频率和基线残疾的模型中,研究了偏头痛随访结果与基线疼痛灾变评分的关系。结果:在这项研究中,121名同意的参与者被纳入。在调整了年龄、性别、基线头痛频率、基线残疾和预防性治疗使用的模型中,基线疼痛灾变评分与随访时的残疾评分显著相关(β = 0.81, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.13-1.48, p = 0.020),但与随访时的头痛频率无关(β = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.10至0.19,p = 0.575)。在调整后的模型中检查疼痛灾难化的特定子量表时,只有基线疼痛放大(β = 6.73, 95% CI = 2.95-10.51, p = 0.001)与随访时的残疾有显著关联,而无助感(β = 0.08, 95% CI = -2.11至2.27,p = 0.944)和反刍感(β = -1.83, 95% CI = -4.22至0.56,p = 0.133)与随访时的残疾无显著关联。在两次就诊时测量疼痛灾变的参与者子集中(n = 65),疼痛灾变总分和亚量表得分在两次就诊之间没有显着差异。结论:在儿童和青少年偏头痛患者的临床随访中,基线疼痛灾变评分与偏头痛相关残疾相关,但与头痛频率无关。疼痛放大似乎特别推动了这种联系。未来的研究应该旨在重复我们的结果,并调查是否专门针对减少疼痛放大的干预措施可能有助于减轻儿童和青少年偏头痛相关的残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信