Community hematologist/oncologist perspectives on minimal residual disease testing in patients with multiple myeloma.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2546284
Lucio N Gordan, Amanda Warner, Trevor Heritage, Amy Ming, Niodita Gupta-Werner, Shuchita Kaila, Annelore Cortoos
{"title":"Community hematologist/oncologist perspectives on minimal residual disease testing in patients with multiple myeloma.","authors":"Lucio N Gordan, Amanda Warner, Trevor Heritage, Amy Ming, Niodita Gupta-Werner, Shuchita Kaila, Annelore Cortoos","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2546284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore community hematologist/oncologist perspectives on the patterns, drivers, and barriers of use of minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and gain understanding on the use of these test results in clinical decision-making and response-adapted treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among hematologists/oncologists from a large community oncology practice network in the US who use MRD testing in the management of patients with MM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 22 hematologists/oncologists included, 72.7% reported being comfortable/very comfortable with MRD testing but prescribed a median of only 2.5 tests between September 2019 and October 2023. The most frequently reported driver for MRD testing was to monitor patient remission status. The logistics of sending samples to MRD testing facilities was the most frequently reported perceived barrier for MRD testing. The use of MRD test results to guide treatment decisions and further MRD monitoring varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are opportunities to reduce the barriers for the use of MRD testing and for generation of additional data on the clinical impact of these test results to support the development of guidelines and provide further education on the implementation of MRD test results in clinical practice and aid clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2875-2883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2546284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore community hematologist/oncologist perspectives on the patterns, drivers, and barriers of use of minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and gain understanding on the use of these test results in clinical decision-making and response-adapted treatment approaches.

Methods: A survey was conducted among hematologists/oncologists from a large community oncology practice network in the US who use MRD testing in the management of patients with MM.

Results: Of 22 hematologists/oncologists included, 72.7% reported being comfortable/very comfortable with MRD testing but prescribed a median of only 2.5 tests between September 2019 and October 2023. The most frequently reported driver for MRD testing was to monitor patient remission status. The logistics of sending samples to MRD testing facilities was the most frequently reported perceived barrier for MRD testing. The use of MRD test results to guide treatment decisions and further MRD monitoring varied.

Conclusion: There are opportunities to reduce the barriers for the use of MRD testing and for generation of additional data on the clinical impact of these test results to support the development of guidelines and provide further education on the implementation of MRD test results in clinical practice and aid clinical decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区血液学家/肿瘤学家对多发性骨髓瘤患者微量残留疾病检测的看法
目的:探讨社区血液学家/肿瘤学家对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者使用最小残留病(MRD)检测的模式、驱动因素和障碍的看法,并了解这些检测结果在临床决策和适应反应的治疗方法中的应用。方法:对美国大型社区肿瘤实践网络中使用MRD检测管理mm患者的血液学家/肿瘤学家进行了一项调查。结果:在包括22名血液学家/肿瘤学家中,72.7%的人表示对MRD检测感到满意/非常满意,但在2019年9月至2023年10月期间,中位数仅为2.5次。据报道,MRD检测最常见的驱动因素是监测患者缓解状态。将样品送到MRD测试设施的后勤工作是MRD测试最常见的障碍。使用MRD测试结果来指导治疗决策和进一步的MRD监测各不相同。结论:有机会减少使用MRD检测的障碍,并产生关于这些检测结果临床影响的额外数据,以支持指南的制定,并为临床实践中MRD检测结果的实施提供进一步的教育,并帮助临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信