Functional/dissociative seizures: Proposal for a new diagnostic label and definition by the ILAE task force.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI:10.1111/epi.18574
Coraline Hingray, Stoyan Popkirov, Kasia Kozlowska, Chrisma Pretorius, Mercedes Sarudiansky, Wissam El-Hage, Dong Zhou, Deniz Ertan, W Curt LaFrance, Markus Reuber
{"title":"Functional/dissociative seizures: Proposal for a new diagnostic label and definition by the ILAE task force.","authors":"Coraline Hingray, Stoyan Popkirov, Kasia Kozlowska, Chrisma Pretorius, Mercedes Sarudiansky, Wissam El-Hage, Dong Zhou, Deniz Ertan, W Curt LaFrance, Markus Reuber","doi":"10.1111/epi.18574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acceptability and validity of the term \"psychogenic nonepileptic seizures\" (PNES) have been questioned. Currently, numerous alternative terms, such as \"conversion,\" \"dissociative,\" \"functional,\" \"attacks,\" and \"events,\" are used in both medical literature and clinical practice, leading to confusion among professionals and patients. The lack of a uniform diagnostic label is likely to impede research funding and service development. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Psychiatry Commission charged its task force focusing on these seizures to propose a more uniform and integrative terminology. Members of the previous ILAE PNES Task Force (2017-2021) helped to organize two workshops to try to build a consensus for a new terminology. These meetings involved experts by experience, clinicians, and researchers, including representatives of the Functional Neurological Disorders Society (an international professional organization), FND Hope (an international patient advocacy organization), and the American Epilepsy Society. The current task force (2021-2025) continued this work by reviewing the existing literature and debating the nomenclature and classification of seizures commonly labeled as PNES. The present proposal paper synthesizes the findings of this process. Based on our critical consideration of the literature, academic insights, and clinical experience, and noting the current international medical and psychiatric classification systems, the ILAE task force proposes the new term \"functional/dissociative seizures\" (FDS). This proposal paper explores the pros and cons of each component of the label \"functional,\" \"dissociative,\" and \"seizure\" from different perspectives, taking account of patient and health care professional acceptability, diagnostic and semiological considerations, underlying illness mechanisms, treatment provision, and health-economic, sociocultural, and linguistic factors. The dual characterization and use of a slash offer clinicians flexibility to adopt either \"functional\" or \"dissociative,\" or both, in their practice depending on the patient's profile, their own preferences, and the cultural/linguistic context. The abbreviation \"FDS\" is recommend for use in scientific writings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acceptability and validity of the term "psychogenic nonepileptic seizures" (PNES) have been questioned. Currently, numerous alternative terms, such as "conversion," "dissociative," "functional," "attacks," and "events," are used in both medical literature and clinical practice, leading to confusion among professionals and patients. The lack of a uniform diagnostic label is likely to impede research funding and service development. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Psychiatry Commission charged its task force focusing on these seizures to propose a more uniform and integrative terminology. Members of the previous ILAE PNES Task Force (2017-2021) helped to organize two workshops to try to build a consensus for a new terminology. These meetings involved experts by experience, clinicians, and researchers, including representatives of the Functional Neurological Disorders Society (an international professional organization), FND Hope (an international patient advocacy organization), and the American Epilepsy Society. The current task force (2021-2025) continued this work by reviewing the existing literature and debating the nomenclature and classification of seizures commonly labeled as PNES. The present proposal paper synthesizes the findings of this process. Based on our critical consideration of the literature, academic insights, and clinical experience, and noting the current international medical and psychiatric classification systems, the ILAE task force proposes the new term "functional/dissociative seizures" (FDS). This proposal paper explores the pros and cons of each component of the label "functional," "dissociative," and "seizure" from different perspectives, taking account of patient and health care professional acceptability, diagnostic and semiological considerations, underlying illness mechanisms, treatment provision, and health-economic, sociocultural, and linguistic factors. The dual characterization and use of a slash offer clinicians flexibility to adopt either "functional" or "dissociative," or both, in their practice depending on the patient's profile, their own preferences, and the cultural/linguistic context. The abbreviation "FDS" is recommend for use in scientific writings.

功能性/解离性癫痫发作:由ILAE工作组提出的新的诊断标签和定义建议。
“心因性非癫痫性发作”一词的可接受性和有效性一直受到质疑。目前,医学文献和临床实践中使用了许多替代术语,如“转化”、“分离”、“功能”、“攻击”和“事件”,导致专业人员和患者之间的混淆。缺乏统一的诊断标签可能会阻碍研究经费和服务的发展。国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)精神病学委员会责成其特别工作组专注于这些癫痫发作,以提出一个更统一和综合的术语。上届ILAE PNES工作组(2017-2021)的成员帮助组织了两次研讨会,试图就新术语达成共识。这些会议有经验专家、临床医生和研究人员参加,包括功能性神经障碍学会(一个国际专业组织)、FND Hope(一个国际患者倡导组织)和美国癫痫学会的代表。目前的工作组(2021-2025)通过回顾现有文献并讨论通常标记为PNES的癫痫发作的命名和分类来继续这项工作。本提案文件综合了这一进程的结果。基于我们对文献、学术见解和临床经验的批判性考虑,并注意到当前的国际医学和精神病学分类系统,ILAE工作组提出了新的术语“功能性/分离性癫痫”(FDS)。本文从不同的角度探讨了“功能性”、“分离性”和“癫痫”标签的利弊,考虑到患者和医疗保健专业人员的可接受性、诊断和符号学方面的考虑、潜在的疾病机制、治疗提供以及健康——经济、社会文化和语言因素。双重特征和斜杠的使用为临床医生提供了灵活性,可以根据患者的情况、他们自己的偏好和文化/语言背景,在实践中采用“功能性”或“分离性”或两者兼有。缩写“FDS”推荐在科学著作中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信