Calibration of bronchial methacholine challenge: addressing dose accuracy and practicality.

IF 1.4 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2025.2546678
Flemming Madsen, Birgitte Hanel, Jann Mortensen
{"title":"Calibration of bronchial methacholine challenge: addressing dose accuracy and practicality.","authors":"Flemming Madsen, Birgitte Hanel, Jann Mortensen","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2025.2546678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methacholine bronchial provocation (BMP) is a valuable tool in supporting the diagnosis of asthma, but the BMP must be validated regarding dosing, since the BMP basically is a dose response study. Historically, the dose delivered by a nebulizer has been calibrated gravimetrically, by weighing the nebulizer before and after dosing. However, this method is no longer recommended, since it has been recognized that a large fraction of the weight loss was due to evaporation. Unfortunately, practical alternatives are not available, forcing clinicians to rely on the manufacturer's specified dose output. We studied the validity of the dose claimed to be delivered by the Vyaire APS-Pro.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To determine the dose output, we applied a radioactive method, considered the gold standard, and we validated a commercially available chemical analysis of chloride.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The output from the APS-Pro was found to be highly correlated (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94) with the dose specified by the APS-Pro software but was consistently 1.8 times higher. The new chemical method demonstrated accuracy comparable to the radiometric approach. Notably, we observed significant variations in output across different nebulizers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The methacholine dose delivered to the mouth via the APS-Pro does not align with company specifications due to variability between nebulizers and a non-linear relationship between nebulization time and output, leading to higher output rates during shorter nebulization periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual output calibration of specific BMP systems remains necessary, as current systems still do not consistently meet manufacturer's specifications. Clinicians must therefore have access to practical calibration methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"2546678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2025.2546678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methacholine bronchial provocation (BMP) is a valuable tool in supporting the diagnosis of asthma, but the BMP must be validated regarding dosing, since the BMP basically is a dose response study. Historically, the dose delivered by a nebulizer has been calibrated gravimetrically, by weighing the nebulizer before and after dosing. However, this method is no longer recommended, since it has been recognized that a large fraction of the weight loss was due to evaporation. Unfortunately, practical alternatives are not available, forcing clinicians to rely on the manufacturer's specified dose output. We studied the validity of the dose claimed to be delivered by the Vyaire APS-Pro.

Methods: To determine the dose output, we applied a radioactive method, considered the gold standard, and we validated a commercially available chemical analysis of chloride.

Results: The output from the APS-Pro was found to be highly correlated (R2 = 0.94) with the dose specified by the APS-Pro software but was consistently 1.8 times higher. The new chemical method demonstrated accuracy comparable to the radiometric approach. Notably, we observed significant variations in output across different nebulizers.

Discussion: The methacholine dose delivered to the mouth via the APS-Pro does not align with company specifications due to variability between nebulizers and a non-linear relationship between nebulization time and output, leading to higher output rates during shorter nebulization periods.

Conclusion: Individual output calibration of specific BMP systems remains necessary, as current systems still do not consistently meet manufacturer's specifications. Clinicians must therefore have access to practical calibration methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

支气管甲胆碱的校准挑战:解决剂量准确性和实用性。
甲基胆碱支气管激发(BMP)是支持哮喘诊断的一个有价值的工具,但BMP必须在剂量方面进行验证,因为BMP基本上是一种剂量反应研究。从历史上看,雾化器的剂量是用重量法校准的,即在给药之前和之后称重雾化器。然而,这种方法不再被推荐,因为人们已经认识到,体重减轻的很大一部分是由于蒸发。不幸的是,没有可行的替代方案,迫使临床医生依赖制造商的指定剂量输出。我们研究了Vyaire APS-Pro声称提供的剂量的有效性。方法:为了确定剂量输出,我们采用了放射性方法,考虑了金标准,并验证了一种市售的氯化物化学分析方法。结果:APS-Pro的输出量与APS-Pro软件规定的剂量高度相关(R2 = 0.94),但始终高出1.8倍。这种新的化学方法显示出与放射法相当的准确性。值得注意的是,我们观察到不同雾化器的输出有显著差异。讨论:由于喷雾器之间的变化以及雾化时间和输出之间的非线性关系,通过APS-Pro输送到口腔的甲胺醇剂量与公司规格不一致,导致在较短的雾化时间内输出速率更高。结论:特定BMP系统的单独输出校准仍然是必要的,因为当前的系统仍然不能始终满足制造商的规范。因此,临床医生必须能够使用实用的校准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信