Marc Zanello, Gonzague De France, Angela Elia, Marco Demasi, Cristina Filipescu, Elisabeth Landre, Alessandro Moiraghi, Bénédicte Trancart, Maimiti Seneca, Agathe Guibert, Fabrice Chretien, Alexandre Roux, Johan Pallud
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of awake craniotomy in adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.","authors":"Marc Zanello, Gonzague De France, Angela Elia, Marco Demasi, Cristina Filipescu, Elisabeth Landre, Alessandro Moiraghi, Bénédicte Trancart, Maimiti Seneca, Agathe Guibert, Fabrice Chretien, Alexandre Roux, Johan Pallud","doi":"10.1111/epi.18617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although awake craniotomy can guide functional brain mapping and resection, its feasibility and safety have been poorly studied in large series of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study of 588 consecutive awake craniotomies (2010-2024). Patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were compared to controls, with a focus on subgroup analysis of patients with low-grade, developmental, epilepsy-associated brain tumor and an associated nontumoral epileptogenic brain lesion group (46/558 patients, 8.2%), patients with ≥2 years of uncontrolled epileptic seizures (32/558 patients, 5.6%), and patients on ≥2 antiseizure medications (77/588 patients, 13.1%). Feasibility outcomes included time to awakening, intraoperative cooperation, and procedure abortion. Safety outcomes included surgery-related risks and intraoperative and early postoperative epileptic seizures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, patients with medically drug-resistant focal epilepsy (1) did not present higher rates of late awakening (6.5%-14.3% vs. 8.7%-9.8%, p = .450, p = .972, p = .143) or of insufficient intraoperative cooperation (0%-9.1% vs. 5.0%-6.1%, p = .019, p = .345, p = .173), (2) did not require abortion of the awake procedure because of epilepsy (0% vs. 0%, p = 1.0), (3) did not present a higher rate of intraoperative epileptic seizures (4.3%-9.1% vs. 2.7%-5.0%, p = .226, p = .529), (4) presented a higher rate of intraoperative epileptic seizures when presenting a ≥2-year history of uncontrolled epileptic seizures (12.9% vs. 2.3%, p < .001), and (5) did not exhibit a higher rate of early postoperative epileptic seizures (13.0%-19.3% vs. 9.8%-10.6%, p = .613, p = .143, p = .078). In multivariable analysis, drug-resistant focal epilepsy was not independently associated with time to awakening, intraoperative cooperation, procedure abortion, or occurrence of intraoperative or early postoperative epileptic seizures.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Awake craniotomy appears feasible and safe in patients with medically drug-resistant focal epilepsy, with similar and low rates of adverse events, including intraoperative epileptic seizures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Although awake craniotomy can guide functional brain mapping and resection, its feasibility and safety have been poorly studied in large series of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy surgery.
Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study of 588 consecutive awake craniotomies (2010-2024). Patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were compared to controls, with a focus on subgroup analysis of patients with low-grade, developmental, epilepsy-associated brain tumor and an associated nontumoral epileptogenic brain lesion group (46/558 patients, 8.2%), patients with ≥2 years of uncontrolled epileptic seizures (32/558 patients, 5.6%), and patients on ≥2 antiseizure medications (77/588 patients, 13.1%). Feasibility outcomes included time to awakening, intraoperative cooperation, and procedure abortion. Safety outcomes included surgery-related risks and intraoperative and early postoperative epileptic seizures.
Results: Compared to controls, patients with medically drug-resistant focal epilepsy (1) did not present higher rates of late awakening (6.5%-14.3% vs. 8.7%-9.8%, p = .450, p = .972, p = .143) or of insufficient intraoperative cooperation (0%-9.1% vs. 5.0%-6.1%, p = .019, p = .345, p = .173), (2) did not require abortion of the awake procedure because of epilepsy (0% vs. 0%, p = 1.0), (3) did not present a higher rate of intraoperative epileptic seizures (4.3%-9.1% vs. 2.7%-5.0%, p = .226, p = .529), (4) presented a higher rate of intraoperative epileptic seizures when presenting a ≥2-year history of uncontrolled epileptic seizures (12.9% vs. 2.3%, p < .001), and (5) did not exhibit a higher rate of early postoperative epileptic seizures (13.0%-19.3% vs. 9.8%-10.6%, p = .613, p = .143, p = .078). In multivariable analysis, drug-resistant focal epilepsy was not independently associated with time to awakening, intraoperative cooperation, procedure abortion, or occurrence of intraoperative or early postoperative epileptic seizures.
Significance: Awake craniotomy appears feasible and safe in patients with medically drug-resistant focal epilepsy, with similar and low rates of adverse events, including intraoperative epileptic seizures.
目的:虽然清醒开颅术可以指导脑功能定位和切除,但其在大系列耐药局灶性癫痫手术患者中的可行性和安全性研究甚少。方法:对2010-2024年588例连续清醒开颅手术患者进行观察性、回顾性、单中心队列研究。将耐药局灶性癫痫患者与对照组进行比较,重点对低度发育性癫痫相关脑肿瘤及相关非肿瘤性癫痫性脑病变患者(46/558,8.2%)、癫痫发作不受控制≥2年的患者(32/558,5.6%)和服用≥2种抗癫痫药物的患者(77/588,13.1%)进行亚组分析。可行性指标包括苏醒时间、术中配合、流产过程。安全性指标包括手术相关风险、术中及术后早期癫痫发作。结果:与对照组相比,药物耐药局灶性癫痫患者(1)的晚醒率不高(6.5% ~ 14.3% vs. 8.7% ~ 9.8%, p =。450, p =。972, p =。143)或术中配合不足(0% ~ 9.1% vs. 5.0% ~ 6.1%, p =。019, p =。345, p =。173),(2)不需要因癫痫而流产清醒手术(0%对0%,p = 1.0),(3)术中癫痫发作率不高(4.3%-9.1%对2.7%-5.0%,p = 1.0)。226, p =。529),(4)当出现≥2年的未控制癫痫发作史时,术中癫痫发作的发生率更高(12.9% vs. 2.3%, p意义:清醒开颅术对于医学上耐药的局灶性癫痫患者是可行和安全的,包括术中癫痫发作在内的不良事件发生率相似且较低。
期刊介绍:
Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.